I've often reflected on the fact that the "mainstream media" - by which I mean CNN, Fox News, MSNBC; and their source, Associated Press - often presents the same stories in the supposedly distinct "programming" - by which I literally mean the series of visuals and narrative that are meant to program the minds of the U.S. into a cohesive dialectic. I've studied and interviewed enough to know that not only are intelligence operatives placed inside newsrooms; not only is the Federal Government generating fake newscasts with impunity; and, not only are many of the newscasters (O'Reilly, Matthews, Hannity, etc.) in on it; but, the scheme truly is obviously simple. Simply, selected stories are chosen for the mass consumption of the American populace.
In writing of the CIA's Operation Mockingbird, Alex Constantine details the inception and implementation of intelligence infiltration into media. Under the auspices of "fighting Communism," (that supreme 20th Century banker's scheme), globalist operatives created Mockingbird. Alex Constantine: "The network was overseen by Allen Dulles, a templar for German and American corporations who wanted their points of view represented (monopolized E.F) in the public print. Early Mockingbird influenced 25 newpapers and wire agencies consenting to act as organs of CIA propaganda." As Anup Shah adds in his work, "War, Propaganda, and the Media": "Military control of information during war time is also a major contributing factor to propaganda, especially when the media go along with it without question." Interesting to note is that the U.S. has been deemed to be at perpetual war. The gold fleece surrounding three sides of the U.S. flag in all courtrooms is evidence of this. Executive Order 10834 of 1959 clearly states, "a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides." Yes, it is true. America is under military rule, especially in courts. Increasingly, this military flag is being used for Federal rituals, and in corporate offices.
The CIA, and we can expect the FBI, NSA, even Mossad and other foreign intelligence agencies, have taken over mainstream news media. So, it should not be any surprise that agents embedded inside network news are quite compelled to run fake news stories given to them by the government; a government controlled by the corporations and the international banking cartel (that owns the 1st World militaries.) Without much detail, here is a smattering of mainstream news stories admitting the truth. The Guardian Unlimited: "TV news reports in America that showed President George Bush getting a standing ovation from potential voters have been exposed as fake, it has emerged. The US government admitted it paid actors to pose as journalists in video news releases sent to TV stations intending to convey support for new laws about health benefits." The Center for Media Democracy relays that the GAO deemed the practice illegal on several fronts.
"The General Accounting Office determined that video news releases touting the new Medicare law, which ran as news reports on some 40 stations, violated a ban on government funded publicity and propaganda." Now, no one should ponder notions that Bush is the first President to use unethical propaganda practices. Yet, it can't be refuted that Bush might be the most flagrantly exhibitionist of leaders since FDR. Bush spit in the face of the GAO, as revealed in the following article. The Washington Post, among many others, reported: "The Bush administration, rejecting an opinion from the Government Accountability Office, said last week that it is legal for federal agencies to feed TV stations prepackaged news stories that do not disclose the government's role in producing them." Blah, blah, blah, they'll do whatever they want, business as usual.
The effect of all this is that the mainstream news reports almost identical stories, everyday, all year. To demonstrate this, here are headlines for April 28, 2005.
CNN, Headline - The most important news of the day for CNN, despite the UN involvement in Sudan, despite the ongoing Iraq War, despite the crashing dollar, was Michael Jackson's ex-wife's testimony in his pedophilia case.
FOX, Headline - What do you know? The glaring headline at Fox is also Jackson's baby's Momma.
MSNBC, Headline - You guessed it. 'Great Father' claims Rowe, Jackson's ex.
CBS, Headline - 'Iraqi Lawmakers OK Partial Cabinet'. Well, it's a bit better, but the second story, one of the few with a picture, was the Jackson ex story.
Of the top five stories from these news sources today, every one included Jackson's ex and the search for the missing Georgia bride. All had one story on child pornography and one on some form of Congressional bickering.
This might not be evidence that there is a central news source, but facts suggest that there is a central intelligence news sources. The primary backer of fake news, slanted news, embedded journalist, and homogenous news have been revealed as corporations, owned by the very Elite who are members of, or have representatives involved in, the Elite organizations: Bilderberg, IMF, World Bank, U.N., CFR, etc. The corporate and banking masters make money off war and regulated commerce. They've declared war on America, and are in control of our government. We have been put up as corporate property in response to our nation's declaring bankruptcy under FDR. Our corporate government claims a de facto right to control news in times of war. Therefore, we are in perpetual war. The Elite's right to propagandize is thus substantiated.
Watch Fox, or CBS; read the New York Times or Time; listen to Hannity or Colmes. It matters little. You will get Michael Jackson, donkey vs. elephant bickering, isolated pedophilia cases, and a lion's share of inanity. O'Reilly will declare that the government is committing treasonous acts by allowing erosion to national security at the borders. Then, he'll defend Bush and tell you the "crazy lefties" are the traitors for insisting that we should not be at war in Iraq. Hannity heralds the Minute Men Project (seeing the "journalist" in Arizona in his perfectly pressed khakis and $250 hair coif was hilarious). Yet, he refuses to take Bush, or Schwarzenegger, to task: the former for calling the Minute Men "vigilantes," and the latter for reversing his statement about closing the border.
The manifestation of this call to monopolize news became evident in 2003. The FCC under Michael Powell, Colin Powell's son (more nepotism), now allows one company to own up to 45% of all news sources. This means, theoretically, three companies could control all of our news. What does this mean? Wired News reported that there are hundreds of news outlets, but "the reality is, those 500 channels are owned by a handful of companies, opponents say. And once the ownership rules are lifted, those firms will buy and consolidate the few independent, profitable outlets remaining."
The good news is that people are realizing that television news has been coopted. It's universally accepted that citizens are turning to the Internet for their daily dose of political updating. Good for this blogger, bad for the Big Boys. We're incessantly admonished for looking into the Webosphere for information, chiefly because there are too many mistakes and outright falsehoods due to the unprofessional nature of the bloggers. I submit that this makes no difference, as mainstream news routinely gives us mistakes and falsities. The latter is more detrimental. Because all news on TV is the same despite the channel, it appears to be infallible. But, when CNN, FOX, and the rest were reporting that Saddam had WMD's (O'Reilly actually had the heart to apologize for this mistake), thousands of bloggers were clamoring that this was not true, and would come to nothing.
Only one or two stories ran in mainstream print about Bush and Kerry being cousins, and they only modestly touched upon their Skull & Bones affiliations. Bloggers and webmasters have whole sections dedicated to this very important information. The sheer diversity of blogging offsets any problems with mistakes. Points of view are evident online, too, which is not the case on TV. This could be a whole article unto itself, but the bottom line is this: blogs offer variety, historical context, length and depth to news. Mainstream media is controlled by the Elite. Is it any wonder they attack our new domain?
In the end, the American people are smart enough to decide for themselves what is right and wrong, what is true and false. Homogenous news is antithetical to democracy and freedom. Just as the British Crown attacked our blogging predecessors, such as Samuel Adams and Thomas Paine, so too the Federal Crown is attacking the Web. Homogenous news must not ever be accepted by Americans or the World.
All Original Content and Design© HiddenMysteries - TGS (1997-2007)
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
LifeTravellers ~ Reptilian Agenda ~ Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site
All Rights Reserved
Please send bug reports to the Information .
The articles being presented and published are not necessarily the views or the research of TGS HiddenMysteries. TGS may or may not agree with the assumptions, the articles, or the conclusions of the authors. Each article is presented to give everyone every possible source to TRUTH available. Discerning TRUTH is the responsibility of each reader.
We welcome challenging viewpoints from all sources...even opposing viewpoints. In diversity of views we can still find the research and documentation valuable, whether we agree with the views of the author or not.