Acharya S

What About the Anunnaki?

The "Anunnaki" are the major players in a new paradigm that is making its way into popular folklore, via the work of Zecharia Sitchin, an economist by education and profession, and the author of several best-selling books that explore ancient mythology and the enigmatic ruins found around the globe. These various books also seek to demonstrate that there was in ancient times an extraterrestrial race that genetically manipulated mankind for various reasons. The Sitchin thesis ("Sitchinism"), now embraced by numerous other writers, who have incorporated it into what is apparently a new worldview, essentially asserts that these ancient Sumero-Babylonian gods, the Anunnaki, are aliens from the planet Nibiru (Sitchin's "12th Planet"), which passes by the earth every 3,500 years or so, at which time they planet-hop to the earth and create mischief. Although the idea of the ancient gods being aliens may seem novel, the tendency to make the gods of old into "real people" or "flesh and blood" is not at all new, dating to before the time of the Greek historian Herodotus (5th c. BCE) and developed by the Greek philosopher Euhemeros or Evemeras (@ 300 BCE). This tendency is called, in fact, "euhemerism" or "evemerism," which claims that the numerous gods of various cultures were not "mythical" but were in reality kings, queens, warriors and assorted heroes whose lives were turned into fairytales with the addition of miraculous details to their biographies. The current Anunnaki thesis is a modern version of evemerism, although it seeks to explain the miracles as not fabulous "additions" to the tales but genuine attributes of advanced extraterrestrials.

Unfortunately for those who would wish to see concrete evidence of such exciting notions as extraterrestrial visitation in Earth's remote past, the Anunnaki will not be the place to look, as the true nature of these various gods and goddesses was already known long before the era of modern revisionism. This modern revisionism often carries with it an abhorrence of the ideas of those who are classically educated in a given field; it seems to be embraced most frequently by renegades and modern "Indiana Joneses" and thrill-seekers who eschew the typical channels of education.

In such an education, however, if one discovers factual information that is contradictory to what one already believes or perceives, one is compelled by honesty to abandon the earlier, erroneous model and accept the new, which is essentially what the renegade is also attempting to do.  Nevertheless, while it is true that some people (fewer than the masses would like to believe) needn't be specialists in a given field through standard scholastic training, it is of greater validity that someone who has spent years upon years studying an issue, subjected to criticism and feedback by way of "tests" and "grades," is in the end generally going to be more knowledgeable in that field.  For example, if one needs a heart transplant, one must go to a specialist and doctor, not a plumber.  On the other hand, those who are classically educated but do not display acute critical thinking will mindlessly go along with the party line, no matter how wrong it may be, which is why there are renegades, some of whom, such as Charles Fort, have produced some truly remarkable work.

Ancient Astronaut Theory

The tireless researcher Charles Fort was widely known as the chronicler of what are now called "Forteana," bizarre anomalies and mysteries that throw the current perception of reality on its ear, whether it be religious or scientific. In fact, in discovering the origins of mankind, it often appears that neither evolution nor creationism are completely adequate in themselves.  In an attempt to explain these anomalies, which include weird stories or "myths" and enormous, astonishing ruins worldwide, a number of people, including Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin, have created the "ancient astronaut theory," which dictates that alien visitors have been influencing human life for thousands if not millions of years, even to the point of genetic manipulation.  von Däniken, it should be recalled, was one of the first moderns to put forth the ancient astronaut theory and was widely ridiculed and vilified for his observations.  Because of Sitchin's apparent scholastic training, he becomes more credible for many, even though he is one of those renegades who is not scholastically trained in his field. Furthermore, it should be noted that neither man came up with the ancient astronaut theory, which was largely developed by the German school, for one, during the 19th century.

Supporters ("Sitchinites") claim that Sitchin is one of the few people who read the Sumerian language and that because he can read Sumerian, he must be interpreting the data properly. In the first place, the assertion that he is one of the few scholars of Sumerian is not true. In the second, the idea that someone may be able to read a language and therefore can interpret its data properly is a specious argument, because the one certainly does not guarantee the other.  Years before Sitchin, biblical and Dead Sea scrolls scholar John Allegro studied Sumerian intimately and came to very different conclusions, to wit that many of the words revolved around sex and drugs.  Hence, it is not the "mere" ability to read the Sumerian that will produce an accurate rendering of it.

Like so many other paradigms that make it into popular culture, the alien astronaut theory has been agenda-driven. In fact, it seems that the most recent attempt may be prompted by the same type of motivation that produced the Bible, a chronicle largely consisting of the plagiarized myths of other cultures that were evemeristically reconstituted as "humans" of a particular ethnicity. It appears that the Anunnaki thesis has now led to the conclusion that, while the Bible is not infallible, its god Yahweh is valid and its various characters are the superhuman alien-hybrid progenitors of "the chosen."

In reality, there was no reason to recreate the ancient gods as people or humans, because the ancients themselves were quite clear about what it was exactly they were worshipping and fancifully describing in epic poetry. Indeed, the speculation is not needed, as, for example, the Sumero-Babylonians themselves said that the gods were the planets, not people, and that their stories were myths representing personifications of these bodies.

The Ancients Knew What They were Creating

It is believed that by "dismissing" the myths of the ancients as myths, we are somehow robbing them of their "history."  This claim is ludicrous, as it is those who insist that there are no myths who are actually defaming the ancients.  It seems as if everyone has already forgotten the work of the learned and esteemed mythologist Joseph Campbell.  Campbell knew that major biblical tales, such as that of Moses and the Exodus, were mythical.  In his book Occidental Mythology, following a discussion of the Bible, Campbell turns to the "Gods and Heroes of the European West," and says, with apparent resentment:

"Fortunately, it will not be necessary to argue that Greek, Celtic or Germanic myths were mythological.  The peoples themselves knew they were myths, and the European scholars discussing them have not been overborne by the idea of something uniquely holy about their topic."

Perhaps mythology is just not as exciting as the UFOlogical paradigm, whereby ancient astronauts were buzzing all over the place, being worshipped for their extraordinary capacities.  However, the desire to see such a "history" often seems to be coming from exposure as a youth to comic books and sci-fi movies.

Also, the ancients were not the dark and dumb rabble commonly portrayed.  They were, in fact, highly advanced.  As such, they developed over a period of many thousands of years a complex astronomical/astrological system that incorporated the movements and qualities of numerous celestial bodies, which could be called the "celestial mythos."  The celestial mythos is found around the globe in astonishing uniformity.  In fact, it served as the manner by which life on Earth was ordered, as it contained information crucial to life, such as the movements and interrelationship of the sun and moon.  Without the mythos, no people would have been able to become sea-faring, and planting and harvesting would have been difficult.  And the mythos needed no alien intervention to be developed by humans, nor did it need moderns to come along and reinterpret it contrary to what its creators intended.

For example, the Anunnaki play a part in the mythos, but they are not "people," human or otherwise.  The Anunnaki, in general, represent the seven "nether spheres" and guardians of the seven "gates" through which the "sun of God" passes into the netherworld or darkness.  They are also the "tutelary spirits of the earth." So, immediately we encounter a problem which reveals that what Sitchin is putting forth is not what the ancients themselves said of the traditions they themselves developed.  Like so many before him, Sitchin also wants to make the main character of the celestial mythos, the sun, into a person.  Actually, he wants to make it into several extraterrestrials.  These various gods found around the globe, such as Osiris, Horus, Krishna, Hercules, Jesus and Quetzalcoatl, are not people or aliens but personifications of the solar hero, as was stated by the peoples who created them.  The ancients were not so dumb that they mistook planets for people, even though they personified those planets and, where the knowledge or gnosis of the mythos was lost, they hoped for "the incarnation," or the carnalization or appearance of a "god."  There is no need to recreate the wheel here by speculating upon what the ancients "really" meant.

(Even a Christian like Jack Chick knows that these ancient gods were SOLAR HEROES, not people or aliens.)

Misinterpreting the Ancients

In investigating these various subjects, I am reminded of an incident during my archaeological sojourn on the island of Crete.  As we stood inside the covered remains of the ancient town near the sacred site of Mallia, dating to around 2500 BCE, our attention was directed to the stone bowls that appeared outside of the doors of virtually every house in this fascinating village, and we were asked to speculate upon what those bowls could be used for.  Now, despite my defense of my own hard-earned classical education, I have a pet peeve with archaeologists, because they blast into other people's countries, with little direct experience of the culture, and attempt to interpret how those people lived.  They often barely even pay attention to the traditions of the people, especially those who are still living in the area and frequently in the manner of the ancients.  Some of these archaeologists do not even learn the language of the country they are in, such that they cannot communicate with the natives, whose insights would no doubt help them in their quest and reduce the need for endless and groundless speculation.  My professor at the time of this bowl incident was not one of these archaeologists, as he was married to a Greek woman and spoke the language extremely well.  He thus had respect for the indigenous people and did not discount their opinions.

When the professor asked the students - the vast majority of whom either held PhDs or were PhD candidates from respected colleges and universities - to put forth their interpretations of these bowls, a number of them fell into the typical archaeological trap by making grandiose pronouncements that these bowls were for some religious ritual such as the "offering of the first fruits to the gods."  The professor then turned to the old Greek man who had been the caretaker at this site for decades and asked him what the bowls were for.  As he had lived in the area all his life, it made sense that he would know what these accoutrements were for and, indeed, his answer nearly made me laugh out loud because it showed how silly were the archaeologists in their grandiose explanations.  The other archaeologists, not knowing Greek, were not privy to the joke until the caretaker's words were translated by the professor.  "Well," said the old man in regard to the ubiquitous bowls, "they are for the dogs, for water."

This is a typical habit with archaeologists: What they cannot explain, they attribute to some bizarre religious madness.

Another incident made me appreciate a bit of Sitchin's work. Some years ago there was a PBS special about the mysterious Bolivian site of Tiahuanaco, in which an archaeologist, encountering the fabulous building with water sluices, pronounced it a "temple to the water god."  Sitchin sees a more practical silver-working operation, an opinion which may be sound, as there seem to have been at least two "global" civilizations of high degree thousands of years ago who may have in fact been working mines.  The notion of "alien" visitation is not necessarily absurd, especially in consideration of the legends of the ancients who claimed that their ancestors came from the Pleiades or Orion or Sirius, although these claims could very well be allegorical, in that these celestial bodies were considered "gods" and humans frequently believed themselves to be born of the gods.  Indeed, humans are made of "star stuff." Nor is the idea of genetic manipulation eons ago completely ridiculous, particularly because the origin of the races is still not satisfactorily explained and because it is a fact that humans thousands of years ago crossbred animals to create such things as the domesticated pig, dog and cat.

The Sky People

In any serious investigation of this subject, we must be able to discern between the "gods" and the "sky people" mentioned by the ancients.  As noted, the enlightened ancients knew the "gods" were the planets, representing astrotheology. The sky people were a different matter apparently.  Some of them may have been "aliens" in the off world sense, but other legends hold that at least some of these sky people were the remnants of one of the advanced global civilizations destroyed by cataclysm.  The legends further say that such advanced people appeared around the world to reestablish civilization after the various cataclysms.  In doing so, they also reintroduced the celestial mythos, which was subsequently developed by the "natives" to produce their own "flavor."  When these advanced teachers appeared and began to speak of the gods in the mythos, they were often called priests of those gods, i.e., "priest of Apollo."  These titles were at times reduced, first to "priest Apollo," and then just "Apollo."  As time went on, the teacher became associated with the god, such that the mythos became entwined with the "history" of the teacher.  In other words, although a legend may hold that the god Apollo appeared in the flesh to teach the natives, it was in fact merely a representative of the god.

One such "modern" case of this mistaken identity has occurred in Japan, in the village of Shingo, where, inhabitants insist, the remains of "Jesus" and his "brother" are buried.  The story holds that Jesus's "brother" was crucified in his place and that Jesus and his followers fled with the brother's remains to Shingo, where Jesus lived to be 100 years old and to father children with a Japanese woman.  The legend also holds that Jesus had been educated by Buddhist masters during his "lost years."  Unfortunately for all this mythmaking, the alleged graves of Jesus and his brother actually belong to two Christian missionaries who arrived in the 16th century.

Thus, we can see that things are a little more complicated than they appear and that discernment of the highest order is required to determine what has actually happened on this planet.  In a serious scientific search, one needs to be more cautious in jumping to conclusions based on speculation, and to produce a recital of facts, with as little speculation as possible.  These facts come from "the horse's mouth," i.e., the archaeological and historical/legendary records of the ancients themselves, without embellishment or interpretation.

In reality, the ancients also had myths that had nothing to do with sky people or extraterrestrials but which revolved around what was known, i.e., what they could see and detect around them.  Nothing was quite as awesome to the ancients as the earth, sky, planetary bodies and natural forces.  No alien could have compared to the power contained on earth and in the heavens.  The ancients, then, did not mistake the sun and its varied personifications for the real people, except where the gnosis was lost and the civilization had degraded, or where it was deliberately obfuscated in order to defraud, as is the case with Christianity.  Also, to suggest that all these solar heroes such as Krishna, Quetzalcoatl, Osiris, Horus and Jesus, with their virtually identical "lives," were aliens, is just a bit absurd, since it supposes that they all were born of virgins, had tyrants trying to kill them at their birth, were presented with the same gifts, did and said the same things and then were all crucified.  In shoring up such a ridiculous premise, we are asked to believe that "superior" aliens kept "coming down" and kindly obliging the barbaric humans, who kept insisting upon crucifying them (between two thieves, no less).  Quite a bizzaro-world, that.

The Anunnaki and Assorted Other Characters

Contrary to popular belief, the Sumerian culture has been known for centuries and did not appear suddenly out of nowhere with the discovery of the cuneiform tablets found at Ur, capitol of Sumeria, for example.  If anything, the tablets and others verified what we already knew about Sumeria from its inheritors, the Akkadians and Assyro-Babylonians.  The Sumerians were not a lost civilization, except that their older remains such as at Ur had not been preserved.  Their mythology and culture were fairly well preserved in the succeeding civilizations: For instance, some 300,000 tablets of the Babylonians have been found thus far, which include much commentary on their gods.

The main characters in the Sumero-Babylonian religion/mythology are Enlil/Ellil, Utu/Shamash, Marduk/Merodach, Gilgamesh, Nanna/Sin, Inanna/Ishtar, Ea/Enki and Dumuzi/Tammuz.  A number of these deities are in the class called "Anunnaki" and/or "Igigi." The Anunnaki are numbered variously: 7, 50 and 900.

None of these characters is a historical person, as, again, the Sumero-Babylonians correctly identified their own gods as being the "planets," which, of course, included the sun and the moon.Says the Catholic Encyclopedia>regarding Babel:

"The storied tower of Birs Nimrud counts seven of these quadrangular platforms painted in seven colors, black, white, yellow, blue, scarlet, silver, and gold, and in the same order sacred to the stellar gods, Adar (Saturn), Ishtar (Venus), Merodach (Jupiter), Nebo (Mercury), Nergal (Mars), Sin (the Moon), Shamash (the Sun)."

The "king of the Anunnaki," Enlil is the storm/wind god, also essentially the same as the later Bel or Baal, the Canaanite sun god/solar hero.  Enlil and Ninlil give birth to the moon god Nanna, "a major astral deity of the Sumerians," who was called "Sin" in Babylonian. Sin is the same moon god encamped at Mt. Sinai, as well as worshipped at Ur and Harran, where lived the mythical Abraham, progenitor of the Hebrews, who "borrowed" many of their gods (Elohim) from Mesopotamia.  Obviously, neither the moon nor "his parents" are real persons/aliens; nor are the rest.  Regarding Enlil/Bel, the Encyclopedia Britannica says:


"(Akkadian), Sumerian Enlil, Mesopotamian god of the atmosphere and a member of the triad of gods completed by Anu (Sumerian An) and Ea (Enki). Enlil meant 'Lord Wind' - both the hurricane and the gentle winds of spring were thought of as the breath issuing from his mouth, and eventually as his word or command. He was sometimes called Lord of the Air.

"Although An was the highest god in the Sumerian pantheon, Enlil had a more important role he embodied energy and force but not authority. Enlil's cult centre was Nippur. Enlil was also the god of agriculture: the Myth of the Creation of the Hoe describes how he separated heaven and earth to make room for seeds to grow. He then invented the hoe and broke the hard crust of earth; men sprang forth from the hole. Another myth relates Enlil's rape of his consort Ninlil (Akkadian Belit), a grain goddess, and his subsequent banishment to the underworld. This myth reflects the agricultural cycle of fertilization, ripening, and winter inactivity.

"The name of his Akkadian counterpart, Bel, is derived from the Semitic word baal, or "lord." Bel had all the attributes of Enlil, and his status and cult were much the same. Bel, however, gradually came to be thought of as the god of order and destiny. In Greek writings references to Bel indicate this Babylonian deity and not the Syrian god of Palmyra of the same name."

Although there were many Baalim, the singular Baal came to represent the sun in the age of Taurus (@4500-2400 BCE), whence comes the word "bull." 

The moon god Sin is the father of Shamash, the Babylonian sun god who was called Chemosh in Moabite and who was worshipped by the Israelites.  Indeed, "sun" in Hebrew is "shamash."  The sun god Shamash was called the "sublime judge of the Anunnaki."

The "commander of the Anunnaki" and son of Enki/Ea, the god of "the waters" (Gen. 1:1), was Marduk, or Merodach, who is the Mordecai of the biblical book of Esther (Ishtar). Also called a "king of the Igigi," Marduk was the supreme Babylonian god and often represented Jupiter, although as "Bel-Marduk" he incorporated aspects of the sun god as well and was considered as such at a late period in his worship. One of Marduk's 50 names was "Nibiru" or "Nebiru," in which Robert Temple in The Sirius Mystery sees the Egyptian term "Neb-Heru," meaning "Lord of the sun." Rather than representing the "12th planet," the description of Nibiru in the Enuma Elish does indeed seem to depict the personification of the sun and its "exploits." "Nebo" was the Babylonian version of "Moses," actually a solar hero, and Nibiru, in fact, is represented by a winged disc, a common motif representing the sun.  According to the consensus of astronomers worldwide, both amateur and professional, there is no evidence for the 12th planet/Nibiru as Sitchin presents it.  (In other words, "Planet X" is not a known, astronomical reality.)

The demigod/hero Gilgamesh is represented as wrestling the "celestial bull," which is the sign of the age of Taurus and is similar to the motif of the Persian sun god Mithra slaying the bull.  In mourning the death of Enki, Gilgamesh "goes to the mountains of Mashu and passes by the guardian scorpion-demons into the darkness." Mt. Mashu was where "every evening the sun sought repose." Per Robert Temple, "Mashu" is evidently derived from an Egyptian term meaning, "Behold, the sun." Like "Moses," derived from mashah in Hebrew, "Mashu" is apparently related to "Shamash" and represents the sun. The "scorpion-demons" or scorpion-men are evidently the stars in the constellation of Scorpio, in the darkness of the night sky. Gilgamesh has also been associated with the Egyptian sun god Osiris, as has the biblical "Nimrod" or "Nemrod." The Catholic Encyclopedia (CE) states:

"Gilgamesh, whom mythology transformed into a Babylonian Hercules [the Greek solar hero], whose fortunes are described in the Gilgamesh-epos, would then be the person designated by the Biblical Nemrod. Others again see in Nemrod an intentional corruption of Amarudu, the Akkadian for Marduk, whom the Babylonians worshiped as the great God . . . " ("Babylonia")

One of the "seven who decreed the fates," Inanna/Ishtar was the Goddess, alternately Venus, the moon, the constellation of Virgo, the earth, etc.  Ishtar was "Astarte" in Phoenicia, and, as Frazer says in The Worship of Nature, "Her Phoenician worshippers identified her with the Moon . . . " Like the Greek god of the underworld, Hades, who allowed his beloved Persephone to return to the surface in order to create spring, Inanna was the creator of seasons, as she is depicted as permitting the solar-fertility god Dumuzi/Tammuz to remain in the underworld for only six months out of the year.

One of the lesser Anunnaki, the "shepherd god" Tammuz was worshipped also in Jerusalem, per the book of Ezekiel (8:14).  As the Babylonian records state concerning their "garden of Eden" or "Edina," of Eridu: "a dark vine grew; it was made a glorious place, planted beside the abyss. In the glorious house, which is like a forest, its shadow extends; no man enters its midst. In its interior is the Sun-god Tammuz. Between the mouths of the rivers, which are on both sides." (CE "Babylonia")

In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Anunnaki appear thus:

"The Flood: Nergal pull down the dams of the nether waters, Ninurta the war lord threw down the dykes, and the SEVEN judges of hell, THE ANUNNAKI, raised their torches lighting the land with their vivid fire."

The "nether waters" represent the heavens, and the Anunnaki were called "the fates" and light-bearers of the night sky.  They were the "seven judges of hell" and "seven nether spheres," as Barbara Walker relates in her entry on Mary Magdalene (The Woman's Encyclopedia), 614):

"The seven 'devils' exorcised from Mary Magdalene seem to have been the seven Maskim, or Anunnaki, Sumero-Akkadian spirits of the seven nether spheres, born of the goddess Mari.  Their multiple birth was represented in her sacred dramas, which may account for their alleged emergence from Mary Magdalene.  An Akkadian tablet said of them, 'They are seven!  In the depths of the ocean, they are seven!  In the brilliance of the heavens, they are seven!  They proceed from the ocean depths [Maria] from the hidden retreat!"

Walker also relates, in The Woman's Dictionary of Symbols and Sacred Objects, 13:

"A generally accepted view of the universe in antiquity was the doctrine of the planetary spheres, conceived as great crystal domes or inverted bowls nested inside one another over the earth, turning independently of one another at various rates, and emitting the 'music of the spheres' with their motions.  The theory was evolved to explain the apparently erratic movement of planets against the background of the fixed stars.  Reading from the innermost sphere outward, arranging them according to the days of the week, they were the spheres of the moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, and the sun.  Outermost was the eight sphere, the Empyrean, the home of fixed spheres and the ultimate God:  the highest heaven.

"As a corollary to this theory, it was also assumed that there were seven nether spheres descending under the earth:  the 'seven hells' to which Dumuzi and Inanna (or Tammuz and Ishtar) journeyed; whose seven gates were guarded by the seven Anunnaki or Maskim, the nether counterparts of the planetary spirits.  According to an Akkadian magic tablet, 'They proceed from the ocean depths, from the hidden retreat.'  From the ancient idea of the seven nether spheres, Dante took his vision of the descending circles of hell.'

"Early Christians taught that each human soul descends from heaven, picking up one of the seven deadly sins from each planetary sphere along the way:  lust from Venus, anger from Mars, and so on.  After death, the soul returned to the highest heaven, shedding the same sins one by one, while passing the 'innkeeper' of the spheres - providing, of course, that the soul was Christianized and therefore properly enlightened."

One of these Anunnaki, was Ningizzida, a "lesser god of the Underworld," and "one of the guardians of the gate of heaven."

When we study what the ancients said about them, we discover that the Anunnaki, et al., are part of the celestial mythos, not "aliens."  These Anunnaki are, in fact, the "seven nether spheres" or mirror images of the seven "planets."  These seven judges are a common mythical motif, also found in Slavic/Serbian mythology, for example, where they are clearly identified as the planets:

"Among the Serbs the Sun was a young and handsome king. He lived in a kingdom of light and sat on a throne of gold and purple. At his side stood two beautiful virgins, Aurora of the Morning and Aurora of the Evening, seven judges (the planets) and seven 'messengers' who flew across the universe in the guise of 'stars with tails' (comets). Also present was the Sun's 'bald uncle, old Myesyats' (or the moon)." New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology , 284

As we can see, the reality of this issue is much more colorful and luminous than a group of bizarre aliens terrorizing cavemen.  This information is what the ancients themselves wrote.  They did not write, "And so the Anunnaki were sky people from another planet who landed here and mated with humans, etc." In fact, "Anunnaki" is a generic term for gods, especially secondary gods, and means "gods of heaven and earth," not "those who from heaven to earth came." "An" or "Anu" means "sky" and represents the name of the "god of heaven," while "Ki" means "earth" and is the name of the earth goddess.

As noted, the Anunnaki were numbered 900 as well, some of whom apparently represented the stars, i.e., the zodiac, or "heavenly host," as worshipped by the Canaanites and Hebrews. In this regard, Benson writes in The History of God From Abraham to Moses :

"The Anunnaki were analogous to the 'host of heaven' of the Hebrews. Marduk allotted portions to the Anunnaki: 'To the Anunnaki of heaven and earth [Marduk] had allotted their portions.'  Likewise, the Canaanite-Hebrew god El Elyon allotted portions to his sons: 'When the Most High [Heb. Elyon] gave to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of men, he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. For the LORD’s portion is his people, Jacob [Israel] his allotted heritage.' (Deuteronomy 32:8-9 RSV) These 'sons of God' in the following verse are also called the 'host of heaven,' to whom God divided to all the nations: 'And lest you lift up your eyes to heaven, and when you see ... all the host of heaven ... which the LORD your God has divided to all nations under the whole heaven.' (Deuteronomy 4:19 KJV) These gods were secondary gods: 'For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords ...' (Deuteronomy 10:17 KJV) 'O give thanks to the God of gods ...' (Psalm 136:2 KJV)"


Also, the biblical god Yahweh is not a person, alien or otherwise.  "He" too is in large part a solar myth.  Regarding Yahweh, the Catholic Encyclopedia says:

"It seems likely that the name of Ea, or Ya, or Aa, the oldest god of the Babylonian Pantheon, is connected with the name Jahve, Jahu, or Ja, of the Old Testament."

The Babylonian "Ea" is equivalent to Enlil, whom, as we have seen, is a sun god.

(The following regarding Yahweh is an excerpt from my book The Christ Conspiracy:  The Greatest Story Ever Sold.)

Prior to being labeled Yahweh, the Israelite god was called "Baal." signifying the sun in the Age of Taurus.  When the sun passed into Aries, "the Lord's" name was changed to the Egyptian Iao,  which became YHWH, IEUE, Yahweh, Jahweh, Jehovah and Jah.  This ancient name "IAO/Iao" represents the totality of "God," as the "I" symbolizes unity, the "a" is the "alpha" or beginning, while the "o" is the "omega" or end.

In fact, the name Yahweh, Iao, or any number of variants thereof can be found in several cultures:

"In Phoenicia the Sun was known as Adonis . . .  identical with Iao, or, according to the Chinese faith, Yao (Jehovah), the Sun, who makes his appearance in the world 'at midnight of the twenty-fourth day of the twelfth month.'"

YHWH/IEUE was additionally the Egyptian sun god Ra:

"Ra was the father in heaven, who has the title of 'Huhi' the eternal, from which the Hebrews derived the name 'Ihuh.'"

Thus, the tetragrammaton or sacred name of God IAO/IEUE/YHWH is very old, pre-Israelite, and can be etymologically linked to numerous gods, even to "Jesus," or "Yahushua," whose name means "salvation" or "Iao/YHWH saves."  As Godfrey Higgins says in Anacalypsis:

"The pious Dr. Parkhurst. . . proves, from the authority of Diodorus Siculus, Varro, St. Augustin, etc., that the Iao, Jehovah, or ieue, or ie of the Jews, was the Jove of the Latins and Etruscans. . . . he allows that this ie was the name of Apollo . . .  He then admits that this ieue Jehovah is Jesus Christ in the following sentences:  'It would be almost endless to quote all the passages of scripture wherein the name . . . (ieue) is applied to Christ . . . they cannot miss of a scriptural demonstration that Jesus is Jehovah.'  But we have seen it is admitted that Jehovah is Jove, Apollo, Sol, whence it follows that Jesus is Jove, etc."

Yahweh had yet another aspect to "his" persona, as at some early stage the "sacred tetragrammaton" of "God" was bi-gendered.  As Walker states:

"Jewish mystical tradition viewed the original Jehovah as an androgyne, his/her name compounded as Jah (jod) and the pre-Hebraic name of Eve, Havah or Hawah, rendered he-vau-he- in Hebrew letters.  The four letters together made the sacred tetragrammaton, YHWH, the secret name of God. . . .  The Bible contains many plagiarized excerpts from earlier hymns and prayers to Ishtar and other Goddess figures, with the name of Yahweh substituted for that of the female deity."

Thus, even Yahweh was at one time plural, but "he" eventually became an all-male, sky god.  This singular Yahweh was a warrior god, representing the sun in Aries, which is ruled by the warlike Mars and symbolized by the Ram - the same symbolic ram "caught in a thicket" near Abraham and used by him as a replacement sacrifice for his son Isaac.  This warrior god Yahweh was not only Jealous but Zealous, as his name is rendered in Young's Literal Translation:

" . . . for ye do not bow yourselves to another god - for Jehovah, whose name [is] Zealous, is a zealous God."  (Exodus 34:14)

In fact, the same word in Hebrew is used for both jealous and zealous, although is transliterated differently, "qanna" being jealous and "qana," zealous.  As El Elyon was but one of the Canaanite Elohim, the Most High God, so was "Yahweh," as "El Qanna," the Jealous/Zealous God, which is why in the Old Testament he keeps sticking his nose in and shouting at everyone.  The title "Jealous/Zealous" is also appropriate for a god represented by a volcano, as was Yahweh by the smoky and fiery Mt. Sinai.  Hence, Yahweh's followers themselves were intolerant and hotheaded zealots.


There was in reality never any need for sci-fi explanation or speculation as to these various characters and their stories.  Nor was there a need to take the Bible as a literal, historical document.  Indeed, the behind-the-scenes elite have known the allegorical, mythical and astrological nature of the Bible and its characters from the beginning.

It is evident that the ancients recording these myths were in fact often smarter than the average "useless eater," to use a CIA phrase.  They knew the difference between planets and people/aliens.  The architecture, art, writings and traditions of these various ancient cultures, including Sumero-Babylon, India, Egypt, Chaldea, Phoenicia/Canaan, etc., show an advanced degree of civilization surpassing that which followed it.  Such later degradation is particularly true when it comes to biblical peoples.  The Bible, in fact, represents a dumbed-down version of the mythology of the aforementioned cultures.  In reality, in terms of cosmic knowledge, in many important ways modern man has devolved.  One of the major problems is the compulsive and irrational personification and vulgarization of the planetary bodies and of the celestial mythos and ritual, a body of knowledge and wisdom concerning the cosmos and  specifically the solar system, which filled the ancients with awe and reverence.  This mythos and ritual is found worldwide, reflecting a global culture in ancient times.  This body of knowledge is found in stone and story all over the world, reflected in the mysterious megalithic ruins.

To reduce this glory to a band of aliens and/or humans is silly and deplorable, as it robs the ancients of intelligence and wisdom, among other things, including the quality of humanity itself.  Furthermore, part of the brainwashing to get people to accept the story of Jesus Christ, for example - which is the story of the sun - was to make "myths" appear to be foolish stories with no basis in reality.  This mental programming or "meme" has been displayed abundantly, but the fact is that myths are not silly fantasies and hallucinations.  They are stories designed to pass along vital information from generation to generation.  It is easier to remember the "exploits" of the sun, moon and stars, for example, when they are personified and told in a fun story than when presented in a dry dissertation.  It is only when the knowledge, or gnosis, has been lost that humans start believing these entities to be real people - and the gnosis was very effectively driven underground by organized religion, such that it was lost to the masses, who now must piece it together, often coming up with erroneous and inaccurate interpretations with occasional hits now and then.

© 2004 Acharya S.

"Problems with Sitchin" thread from "From Sex to Superconsciousness" discussion list

Zecharia Sitchin and The Earth Chronicles - From Skeptic's Dictionary

Sitchin's Twelfth Planet by Rob Hafernik - In-depth analysis

To HiddenMysteries Internet Book Store

This is a publication of TGS Services -
Please direct all correspondence to
TGS HiddenMysteries, c/o TGS Services,
22241 Pinedale Lane, Frankston, Texas, 75763

All Original Content and Design© HiddenMysteries - TGS (1997-2007) Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
LifeTravellers ~ Reptilian Agenda ~ Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site

All Rights Reserved

Please send bug reports to the Information .

The articles being presented and published are not necessarily the views or the research of TGS HiddenMysteries. TGS may or may not agree with the assumptions, the articles, or the conclusions of the authors. Each article is presented to give everyone every possible source to TRUTH available. Discerning TRUTH is the responsibility of each reader.

We welcome challenging viewpoints from all sources...even opposing viewpoints. In diversity of views we can still find the research and documentation valuable, whether we agree with the views of the author or not.