| Neil Freer | |
Sapiens Rising: Beyond the Babel Factor
A Manifesto for the Children of the 21st Century
This era of global transition
will result in the redesign of the fundamentals of human activity.
People and organizations that look for new ways to deal with unprecedented
events will be better prepared to survive and prosper. To be part of
that group, you must be willing to unleash yourself from the past and
be willing to take risks. You must objectively search for novel tools
and perspectives
.
John Petersen
Our planet, this agonizingly beautiful little planet, is on
hold. Seeking relief and release, in a perverse ecology we recycle
outmoded, primitive paradigms, shuffling our feathers-and-molasses confusion
between hands. In a time when we are required to deal with the politics
of non-overlapping alien realities, we are not able to resolve the separations
caused by our overlapping intra-species realities. It has rendered us
theologically inane, philosophically naive, scientifically cramped, socially
isolated, ecologically damaged, politically challenged and intellectually
bewildered.
Part 1, obviously,
constitutes a very broad, serious and daunting self-indictment.
I posit a caveat: When I name names and institutions, critically or
otherwise, I intend them as part of us, as a self-indictment: it is simply
we doing these things to ourselves. Let us be easy on ourselves, however,
since we are the only game like us on the planet, the only example we can
work with, the inadequate conceptual boxes we inhabit are of our making
but also ours out of which to break. If these negatives were all there
were, then the fears of those in future shock would be vindicated. If
I had no suggestions, solutions, answers or resolutions to offer I would
not have written this paper. So the second half of this paper respectfully
offers an overview and paradigm that can take us, in the perspective of
a deepened knowledge of our species and ourselves, to a new level of racial
maturity and a degree of freedom previously unavailable. The new synthesis
subsumes partial glimpses of a new politic, humanistic new world order,
enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western mysticism, a third
culture, spiritualized psychology, all knowledge united in a grand consilience,
or cerebral turning points. We now have the keys to integrate our past with
our present and future in the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor
for achieving planetary unity.
“What
is emerging now is a sense that something else -- neither mechanistic
(Darwin) nor theistic (the Bible) -- is going on. But mainstream science
will have none of this ambiguity, and reactively tars all non-Darwinian
notions with the broad brush of "biblical superstition." The net
result has become a sort of silly high drama in which one flavor of
pseudoscience attempts to do battle with another”.
While the evolutionists and the creationists have been
battling it out through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps,
another explanatory paradigm has been developing exponentially
which subsumes, corrects, and makes obsolete, specifically relative
to the human species, both of those rather primitive paradigms. While
the scientific imperialists and the religious dogmatists have thought
that they owned the discussion by proprietarily boxing the argument
and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin,
has advanced a robust and coherent paradigm of our genesis and unique
history that, if true, ----- and I am convinced that it is after working
critically with it for 28 years ----- is profound, comprehensive, and
fundamental enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our beginnings
and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically
and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans. Sitchin’s thesis illuminates
that antique conflict with Nobel prize quality research, renders the, by
now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and corrects creationism,
redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day detractions. He has been
able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well as the Semitic languages
including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped in the history. He
has had the advantage of access to the accumulated scholarship and archaeological
material from the Middle East rediscovered only in the last one hundred
and fifty years.
For a more
complete and detailed synopsis of the Sitchin thesis, the context
and historical background needed to understand it, the proofs of its
validity and scientific objections regarding it answered, see Appendix A
Zecharia Sitchin, one of two
hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can read a cuneiform
clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has demonstrated
that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down [from
the heavens] ) , the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient
civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized
Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago,
by genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus. Corroboration
comes from evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory ,
the Infrared search by the IRAS satellite in ‘83-’84; genetically from
the mitochondrial DNA "search for Eve"; anthropologically from the "out
of Africa" data placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years;
enigmatic ooparts and close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation
recovered directly from the ancient civilizations. Our modern science
has provided a means of identifying advanced science in the ancient past
previously thought of as fantastic even for us. The advances in our scientific
discoveries in genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and planetary
science, archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, and linguistics as well
as even the physics of metallurgy have enabled Sitchin to demystify the
advanced technologies of the Anunnaki and identify and explain ooparts
. We have progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership
and, since they phased off Earth, are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic
transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under
the imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.
The Anunnaki phased off this planet at the latest around
1250 B.C. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans
have been going through a very traumatic transition to racial independence.
Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew
and knows what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or when
they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under
the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between
them. Religious ritual is the transmutation of palace servant duties.
The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki table became the
offering of “burnt offerings” on the table now become an “altar”, the
transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a procession
of statues, the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc. The Anunnaki were,
clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in contact with them
as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids (taller and huskier than we, male
and female, the males bearded. We look like they look because we are half
Anunnaki). It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated
into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized.
Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the stages of abandonment
to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion and now to recovery.
We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went for some
three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions. We are ready to step
out of racial adolescence. The "occult" is time-release packages of advanced
technological information entrusted to us in "crash courses" in
civilization, often lost through time, now being recovered through
the clues and recognition afforded by our own science. Ooparts,
high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, “out of place” in time are remnants
of lost technology and knowledge. Transcendental experience is redefined
in terms of dimensional expansion of consciousness and perception.
We are rapidly evolving to habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration, participatory
expansion at the leading edge of our special-case evolution. The totems
and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get
off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap
and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic
enlightenment.
Of course, most scientists and sophisticated scholars
consider themselves enlightened in that they espouse some form of
Darwinian evolutionary theory as the party line, although there are
serious arguments even within the scientific arena as to the full validity
of the Darwinian thesis. Generally, philosophers and scientists apologize
if they think they are even possibly sounding like creationists, spend
most of their energy in either promulgating some version of Darwinian
evolution or attacking what they judge to be its too radical application,
get entangled in arguments about whether Darwinian evolution can be
invoked to explain human creativity, even aesthetics, and generally
put down any other explanation out of hand.
In searching for a word to clearly distinguish between
the various Darwinian type theories of evolution usually applied
to all species including ours, and our unique evolution as revealed
by our history, science and genetics I have found it convenient
to invent the word “Realevolution” . Clearly we are evolving
but in an accelerated, unique way after coming into existence
through a genetic engineering project. That we have adapted
loosely in a Darwinian sense over time is also true but the
fact that we realize we can control and manipulate our realevolutionary
progress and direction goes far beyond the concept of natural selection
by chance genetic mutations.
The Sitchin paradigm provides a comprehensive context
in which to understand and explain the enigmatic facts and anthropological
anomalies of the Darwinian model of our species existence, which
we have already amassed. It provides the context and data for bringing
the efforts of geneticists and the genome projects, often scattered
for a variety of reasons, to a focus on correcting and perfecting the
genetic code, eliminating all disease and handicaps, and providing us
the option of immortality.
How primitive are we? The view from 2100 says very
primitive indeed: we are only beginning to approach the
time when all diseases are preventable and curable. We still pollute
our environment and cause ourselves disease. We have not
overcome aging and death and are afraid of immortality. We get born,
no owner’s manual, to often dubiously qualified, puzzled and puzzling
parents, subject to a multitude of diseases, struggle to make sense out
of what the hell existence on this planet in this universe is all about
and how to deal with it, wonder why there are so many conflicting philosophies
and institutions claiming cosmic franchising and, often, why the universe
seems so unfair and then we die. We are generally conditioned by theocultural
traditions to accept these bizarre conditions as “normal”’ and the will
of some god.
Over the last 2000 years we have seen scientific or
pseudoscientific doctrines espoused by the various religions being
contradicted or demolished and the religions, repeatedly, although
with great delay, change their positions with regard to our genesis,
history, evolution and science, and modify their doctrines. But the
new paradigm addresses the very root doctrines, positions, claimed divine
franchise and authority of all the religions of the world and will eventually
cause the obsolescence of all institutionalized religions springing
from our ancient relationship of subservience to the Anunnaki.
The idea of a cosmic, infinite principle “God”,
as many of us still take it for granted, is a thoroughly mixed composite
concept of the sublimation of the anthropomorphic and imperfect Anunnaki
individuals, the “deities” of slave code religions; metaphysical abstractions
accumulated over time through the speculations of the revered philosophers
from the Greeks onward; the Hellenic influenced, theo-philosophical
teachings of the Roman Church scholastic tradition and mystics; flavored
with the concepts of theists, deists, agnostics, theosophists and mystics
of any number of sects; and thoroughly leavened by the concepts
of the consciousness expanding disciplines and metaphysical doctrines
of the East, sprinkled with our own individual intellectual and emotional
subjective variations and usually still conditioned by the godspell
element of subservience. But that cosmified, composite, intellectual
abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or Jesus of the Judeo-Christian
religions, the Prime Mover of Thomas Aquinas or the Omega point of De
Chardin, the Allah of the Muslim faith, the Brahma of Hinduism, the
Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your choice.
The new paradigm is the basis, perhaps the only adequate
basis, for a profound unification of all humanity. Not some superficial
token ecumenicism or social homogenization of peoples and cultures
and philosophies but a unification that frees us to be one species
and explains and enhances our diversity of adaptations and cultures
and contributions. The cumulative evidence and restored history has
enabled us to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our traumatic
transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and
amnesia into species maturity. All the political, economic, social, scientific,
new age, evolutionary variables are only symptomatic; the genetic level
is where the profound realization must blossom. The restoration of our
generic history and a generic definition of what a human is afford us
the advancement that will take the planet off hold.
This is the end game of an age, be certain. A new human
and a new civilization beyond religion and the old new age are on
the horizon. I submit that the most fundamental, profound, overarching,
sociological transformation we are going through at this point in our
history is the change from the theo-politically controlled and manipulated
explanations of our beginnings and history to species independence.
We are witnessing the last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide.
Whether we chose to acknowledge it or not, we are already well into
one of “…. those Grand Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated”
as John Petersen has characterized it. It is within these redefinitions
that the resolutions to the problems and obstacles deeply embedded
in our species’ and individual psyches’ are to be found. To paraphrase
Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us not go blind into that daylight.
But how do we accomplish the transition from our current planetary standstill
to planetary consensus gracefully and quickly? It’s best to recognize
from the outset that the revolution required, the meta-wild card so
radical in its implications and ramifications and requirements, that
there is no single discipline, no institution, certainly no individual
or group who can bring it about alone. It is so planetarily encompassing
that stepping outside of this box is almost impossible. The change will
have to come from within.
A major contribution to the resolution of the conflicts
between the religions of Western culture in this regard is the
work of Sir Laurence Gardner. Sitchin’s work and the major discoveries
of the Dead Sea Scrolls, has enabled Gardner, an English genealogist—historian
to make a recent breakthrough. Gardner has the advantage of one hundred
and fifty years of discovery and translation of the Sumerian source
material, knowledge of Anunnaki politics and the interaction of Enki
and Enlil implemented by the latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls
and Nag Hamadi documents through the brilliant work of the Australian
theologian, Barbara Thiering . Working as a genealogist with data
available through privileged access to the private archives of thirty
European royal family clients, Gardner has brought to light the fact
that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic
history of a special bloodline carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki
and Sumeria. This information, possessed by the heterodox tradition of
Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer fearful of
the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been available. He has
identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans, enhanced by Enki
with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human leader-rulers in
a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the way back to Sumer.
The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal, which, etymologically,
stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning special bloodline.
The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes,
initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt
to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by
the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jesus was
an Essene in the bloodline as was Mary Magdalene. They were man and wife
and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that tradition.
We need to think about what it is like to be a member of a synthesized
species which is going through a special case of evolution, a rapid
metamorphosis, where we can actually determine our own evolutionary direction,
when the ramifications of that unthinkable thought are now about to bring
about a turning point in our history. It is about the new civilization
we are about to create out of the new planetary vision.
A cardinal result of our confusion
about who and what we are causes us to be at a loss as to what the thrust
and direction, the trajectory of that evolutionary dynamic might be.
When we, collectively, recognize the validity of the new paradigm and
restore our true history to ourselves we will gain a critical major advantage
in that we will be positioned to understand not only our unique synthetic
nature but our unique evolutionary trajectory. This will mark a cardinal
turning point in our history.
The evolutionary demographic
profile of the species, at any given time, tends to be that of a bell
curve. The segments of the bell curve are composed of gene pools with
different focuses and different functions. Perhaps two percent
of the population, at any given time, will be located at the very leading
edge of the curve. These are the futants, those who are genetically programmed
to be the evolutionary scouts of future dimensions, scenarios, and potentials.
Rather than kill them, jail them, shun them, we had better learn to recognize
their function, sort out the valuable parts of their reports of the future,
and honor their contribution to the evolutionary progress of our species.
Genetic enlightenment will
afford derivative major advantages in psychology, sociology, and education.
The concept of a new world order, in itself, can be an idealistic
and benevolent goal although the perverted notion of such put forth
by some devolved politicians has set back an constructive progress in that
direction considerably. The League of Nations and, currently, the United
Nations are certainly steps in the right direction. The imposition of world
domination by economic, political, military, or theocratic coercion are
retrograde and primitive attempts doomed to well deserved failure. The conflicts
and wars covering the planet are, in their transparently theo-political
base, robot--like attempts to run the Realevolutionary videotape in
reverse and mark the beginning of a final, very slow denouement
of that godspell phenomenon.
The new paradigm, elucidating
our unique genesis and subsequent unique evolution (at least on this
planet: it may happen similarly with synthesized species elsewhere)
as, in a very real sense, an artificial intelligence, frees us to conceive
the real questions we need to ask ourselves and the answers not only
our science but the entire racial pool of experience and knowledge needs
to provide with regard to AI. One of the most important contributions
our restored history provides relates directly to the novel wild card
concept of self-aware artificial consciousness in that it furnishes
a wealth of information on the sociobiology of the creation of a synthetic
species and the resulting, evolving social relationship between the
creators and the created, between the Anunnaki and us.
The elements that characterize
the new civilization are a collective, consensual awareness of our
generic humanity as a planetary unity, a recognition of a common, known
history from the beginning of the race as a genetically engineered species,
a globally common conception of human nature and its evolutionary direction,
a multi--dimensional sociobiology capable of reflexive self-analysis,
a psychology devoted to fostering the positive evolutionary development
of the individual over the entire spectrum of consciousness, a unified
scientific field expressed through a profound natural language based on
self-referential consciousness, an ecological, non-competitive, ubiquitously
helpful economics, an integral systems approach to the management of the
material realm, with the primary focus on the transcendental as the essential
human process. All Original Content and Design© HiddenMysteries - TGS (1997-2007) Please send bug reports to the Information . The articles being presented and published are not necessarily the views or the research of TGS HiddenMysteries. TGS may or may not agree with the assumptions, the articles, or the conclusions of the authors. Each article is presented to give everyone every possible source to TRUTH available. Discerning TRUTH is the responsibility of each reader.
Part 1
The Status
Quo: Totem and Taboos and You .... and I
It is clearly evident, after thousands of years of trial and
disastrous errors, that the relief and release from our racially adolescent
immaturity we seek as individuals and as a planetary species will not
come from yet another econopolitical experiment, yet another U.N. negotiated
conflict resolution, religious ecumenical conference, new age vision,
academic philosophy, imposition of theocracy, new constitutional political
format, much less some new twist on the MAD scenario, or war to end all
wars.
The purpose of this paper is to point out an overarching new
paradigm that redefines and, thereby, resolves and supercedes the most
fundamental cause of the divisions and conflicts between us and illuminates
the now and future trajectory of the new planetary human.
A very fundamental, critical question, therefore: Is it even
possible to arrive at an overarching new planetary paradigm so comprehensive
and robust that it corrects, subsumes, completes and outmodes all previous
partial paradigms, explains all our previous explanations, with the
scope and power to unify and pacify the planet? Unequivocally,
yes. We are not incapable of getting off “maybe”. We are blocked only
by primitive, antique legacies and the way to expunge them from the
fabric of our cultures is now available to us.
How adolescent a species are we?
We are accustomed to analyze, evaluate and react to significant
positive or negative events in the public and private sectors in terms
of political, military, economic, scientific, psychological, sociological,
or religious factors and ramifications. We do this in the context
of a primitive economic, competitive mammalian politic based on territory
and the defense of limited survival resources when national boundaries
have been rendered meaningless and free energy sources are already
available. The least evolved among us, in a perversion of the word
“conservative”, preserve their wealth, built on limited energy supply,
by deliberately suppressing developments that would make it limitless.
As most current example, if confined to this context of mammalian politics,
we surely will see, the “end of the west” --- the “wild”, Paleolithic,
west at least --- and the rise of the European Union in its turn in the
dreary cycles of competitive mammalian economics. Then the “rise” of China,
perhaps, etc., etc..
Politically, we have created governments peopled largely by
the cynically devolved, many sincere, perhaps, but myopic, in a time
when sincerity alone is tragically inadequate. We are still working
through systems of representation by strangers when direct, instantaneous
input from the entire population is quite possible. Representation, due
to antiquated polling and analytical methods, therefore produces mediocre
politicians from the middle of the demographic bell curve where the
most votes lie. Domestically we are a dead poet's society paralyzed
and waiting perennially for the futant we have probably already terminated
at the stake, in the courtroom, the boardroom, the lab, the dean's office,
the classroom for violating a taboo....
Ideologically, philosophically, the four criterion bases which
we generally use to determine the truth or falsity, beneficence or harmfulness,
morality or immorality of information, theology, philosophy, science
and “new age” values, rattle around in a criteria vacuum with little
overlap and major conflicts because each tends to define a human being
and the meaning of human existence in a quite different way. Among
some humans, there is a slinking cynicism, an often unspoken, viral attitude
in human society that holds the view that it is impossible to get out of
the criteria vacuum, to initialize a common ground; impossible to get past
the communicatory barriers of turf and custom, belief and taboo. When talking
about the human we are largely ineffectual because we are Babel-factored,
literally talking at each other about a different entity.
Technologically, we are eager and close to being able to create
artificial intelligence and consciousness, when we cannot agree on
the nature of our own consciousness.
“A people
without history is not redeemed from time”
T. S. Eliot
How primitively adolescent
are we? Most fundamentally and amazingly, we do not have a consensual,
planetary, generic definition of what a human being is. We disagree
about how we really came into existence, and what the nature of our developmental
process is. We disagree as to the facts and interpretation and understanding
of our species’ history. We have treated the sociobiological event
of our beginning as a species as if we could never be sure if it ever
really occurred. We have not resolved nor integrated our genesis and
our history as a species and, therefore, are at a loss to understood
our real nature and future trajectory. That we do not see this as a profound
puzzle is further proof of our species primitive naiveté.
These problems translate to the problems that are related
to our children and their education. Currently, we matriculate our
young, these amazing, parallel- processing, relativistic, quantum jumping,
multi-dimensional consciousnesses, semi-illiterate and naive for fear
of them questioning our shambling senilities. In a time when we need
to stretch our historical sense to allow for the visitation of our planet
by alien species from before our origins, we teach them drum and trumpet
mammalian history fleshed out with desiccated, parochial, political platitudes.
We teach our own children, privately, generally the same platitudes and
clichés we were taught and brand them with the same religious,
scientific, and intellectual taboos we were tattooed with as children and
expect that they will somehow be ready to do better than we and perhaps
even step into stellar society. Whether we deny it our not, our children
show all the signs of being ready; they are underwhelmed and overqualified.
We feel it. Nevertheless, we do not teach our minors philosophy although
they are capable of calculus. We do not allow a teacher in the public school
system to teach our children anything important about anything important
because we do not agree about what to teach them, because we do not agree
about who and what we are. We do not educate our children in the management
and refinement and evolution of their personal spectrums of consciousness
because we do not agree on what that spectrum includes. And the children
are literally our future, we in the future.
The current status quo is revealed, therefore, at its most
fundamental strata, to be, simply a continuation of the primitive theo-political
conflicts that we have known for the past three thousand years. The
major obstacles that are most fundamentally influencing and hindering
our planetary understanding and progress are cultural legacies, cultural
lock-ins that are with us as the deepest dyes in the tapestries of our
cultures, locked in legacies that influence our thinking, our science,
our logic, and our concepts of ourselves. We are too close to them,
or think that they do not influence us, or that they have been dealt
with in the scientific or academic world long ago, or that we can just
ignore them. We deal, furthermore, with all these problems in a Paleolithic,
turfish manner from the isolated towers of Cartesian-Newtonian oligarchies.
It has been said that the world’s most complex mechanism comes
without an owner’s manual. We have many different and conflicting definitions
of what a human is and a number of conflicting “owner’s manuals” by
which a human is supposed to operate. The word “owner” is the key:
there are two major “owner’s manuals” in the form of Bible and Koran,
two in the form of The Book of Changes (The I Ching) and the Book of the
Tao. The I Ching and the Book of the Tao are instruction manuals in
which the “owner” is understood as the human consulting them. In the case
of the Bible and the Koran the “owners” are not the humans but the deities
associated with the manuals. This relationship of “owner” to subject, deity
to servant or slave, is understood by the vast majority as “religion”.
We hardly question this concept. Those who do question it have often been
killed by those who do not. Those of one slave-code religion have often
killed those of another slave-code religion over whose owner is the only
real Owner or which code is the correct one. Ultimately, these slave-code
definitions determine our cultures and their legacies and traditions and
are the most basic cause of the separations, divisions, conflicts and wars
between humans.
A Self-Indictment
The Primary
Key to Unlocking the Locked-in Legacies
John Anthony West<
Our Genesis
Revisited: The Sitchin Paradigm
Central to the history of the Anunnaki’s occupation
of the planet was the interaction between two brothers, Enlil and
Enki. Enki was their chief scientist who was responsible, with
his sister Ninhursag, their chief medical officer, for the genetic
creation of our species. Enki, obviously, was sympathetic towards
humans and promoted our interests and us. Enlil, eventually known as Jehovah/YHWH,
of the Old Testament, maintained the position that humans were to remain
slaves, totally subservient to the Anunnaki and him especially.
The Traumatic
Transition
Ramifications
and Resolutions
Mythology is our greatest myth. We can move beyond
the interpretation of the gods as myth, Jungian archetypes,
and schizophrenic hallucinations. History as hallucination and
“mythinformation”, after two hundred years of explanatory failure,
although still hiding behind tenure in the university and between
the glossy pages of new age magazines, is a dead issue.
Why is the Sitchin paradigm so pivotal? It is the meta-paradigm
that affords the potential to remove the resultant, stultifying,
locked-in legacies that have kept up separate and enervated for millennia.
The new paradigm is so encompassing and penetrating that it is a unique
meta-wild card: it redefines every cardinal element of human existence
that we think we have understood including a redefinition of our evolution,
all our cultures, our religions and of our very selves.
Those who talk of a singularity, a shearing drop to
extreme novelty and fundamental revolutionary change at some near
point in our future that is so profound that it will change human nature
do not have to look any further than the Sitchin paradigm. It is there
for the acceptance and it will rewrite the entirety of our history and
redefine human nature. After a century and a half of examination
and attempted explanation ---- and suppression ---- of the historical,
archaeological, anthropological and astronomical evidence accumulated,
no other explanatory paradigm comes close to the totally coherent,
robust and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it be improved or corrected?
Certainly.
Just within the time of the writing of this paper there
has been a report of the discovery, by satellite scan, of a city,
two miles by fivemiles in area, under thirty feet of water in
the ocean twenty five miles off the northwest coast of India.
Preliminary carbon dating of dredged materials from the site indicate
its age as nine thousand years old, placing it earlier than Sumer. The
histories of India (declared myth by the British because they were older
than the Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans in the
very remote past and mention this city by name.
What appears to be a city has been reported off the
coast of Cuba under an astounding 2100 feet of water, discovered
by professional treasure wreck hunters using sophisticated equipment.
The Takenouchi documents and artifacts, ancient treasure
of the Japanese Emperor guarded for 2500 years by the family of
the highest Shinto priest caste family, speak of an alien civilization
coming here from space and founding the human race.
All these facts and histories need to be studied thoroughly
and integrated with the histories and data from the entire planet.
We have much work to do. The planetary benefits will be enormous.
Besides the obvious general advantage of working from a consensual
understanding and definition of what a generic human is, we can eliminate
the characterizations of the perennial conflicts as being between
“progress and piety” or between creationism and evolution, or science
and faith. The new paradigm finally and conclusively resolves the
creation-evolutionary conflict specifically concerning our unique genesis.
If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is illusory,
the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are only
half right: there was a creation but it took place in a genetic laboratory;
there is a human evolutionary process but it was interrupted by the Anunnaki
inserting their genes into the Homo Erectus gene code, a very pragmatic,
non-Darwinian kind of interference. We were created and we are evolving
but both in unique ways.
In short: the entire set of world views, theistic,
theo-political, cultural, philosophical and scientific that purport
to explain our genesis, history, and development as a species are
about to be replaced as we recover finally from racial amnesia. The
revolution is inevitable. It will take probably a century to fully
accomplish socially because of the sweepingly profound nature of the
resulting change, the natural resistance of the established institutions,
and the need to reeducate and transition without disorientation. The
new world view is gradually taking hold, cannot be ignored, and is waiting
in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique and vital characteristic
is that it addresses and explains and redefines the root source of all
the ancient religions of the world on a common basis so that no particular
religion can claim privileged status of any kind. Religion, as we know
it, will be understood in the context of our unique history.
The significance and ramifications of this tremendous
body of work, correlated with findings from all other disciplines,
as they bear on our present and future, has been my primary focus
since 1976 when I began work on Breaking the Godspell, the reaction
to which has been predictable and certainly not boring.
There is no better example of the Galileo effect (we
will not look through your telescope because we know what you say
you see can’t be so) in the academic and scientific arenas than the
reaction to the Sitchin paradigm. Campus, scientific, and theological
imperialism and the fields of anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy,
particularly, have tried all the usual unprofessional, unscholarly,
shunning, chest thumping, fang baring, proprietary turf posturing and
ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in tenure tetanus, but the thesis
becomes more and more robust as new evidence comes in continually from
archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and other disciplines.
If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is a hydrogen
bomb. We may have been able to afford to dally with Darwin and defer to
religion for as long as we have but the rapid changes in modern times will
force us to consider Sitchin’s thesis seriously and intensely on a much
shorter basis.
Still Dallying
with Darwin
The general thesis of the evolutionist, therefore,
reads like this: the acceptance of evolution as the mechanism by
which we came about causes us to understand that we are a collection
of biological molecules, interacting with each other as in a mechanism,
according to well defined laws and rules derived from physics and chemistry
---- although not all known or understood by humans as yet. Defining
consciousness within this biological model is still a pivotal problem:
some say it is simply an epiphenomenon, an effect of the operation of
all the parts of the brain working in consort, some say it is the subjective
self-perception of herself or himself by the individual, some say it
must be based in some “new stuff”, some new physics or chemistry that
we don’t yet understand.
Across the general population, however, we do not even
agree on whether we are evolving, what the process really is if,
indeed, we are evolving, from what source and how we began, and in
what direction and on what trajectory, whatever that process is,
we are headed. We do not agree, even more fundamentally, as to what
criteria to use to judge these matters. We are not discussing the same
entity. Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans as having evolved
in the past or as evolving in the present. If we do not agree that
we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution of a species or
individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms, or whether there
are effective methodologies for expediting conscious self evolution,
we will continue to be at standstill. It is quite ironical, however,
that even most of those who hold for some evolutionary view of humankind
evolving to human status in the past do not seem to think in terms of
humans evolving in the present, much less having a well defined conceptualization
of what that process might be.
Charles Darwin published his arguments for evolution
in 1859, one hundred and forty three years ago. Schliemann opened
the buried Pandora’s box of our real archaeological history in 1873,
one hundred and twenty four years ago. Sitchin, having gained the
advantage of discoveries in archaeology, astronomy, space travel, genetics
and linguistics as elucidating and explanatory tools, published first
only in 1976, already over a quarter century ago. Using this rough chronology
as a guide, we might anticipate, even with some exponential bit of acceleration,
that the initial general recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm
will not happen for, perhaps, some fifty years. We really can’t afford,
however, to see Kuhn’s thesis that scientific revolutions take
place only by the old guard dying off rather than by an acceptance through
careful study, critique and proving out, borne out once again.
Bicameral
Genetics As Sociobiology 1A
Consider the facts of our unique genetics and differences
from any other anthropoid or humanoid. Current investigation says
our genetics are about 98 percent the same as a chimp’s. Regardless,
that two, perhaps only one percent obviously makes a vast difference.
We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second
and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today, the anthropological
sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us; Homo
Erectus is currently being promoted. We were contemporaneous with Neanderthals
or even preceded them. We showed up too suddenly in the chronology
of the fossil record. We present with very many startling, obvious differences
from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species,
are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets
far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small
flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density;
our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management
are completely different. Human females do not have an estrus cycle.
We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least.
It becomes quite obvious why we (as a product of a melding of two racial
gene codes where quality control was conditioned by pragmatic purposes)
have some four thousand genetic defects and counting rather than none
to a handful as all other species, in light of the complexity of the merging.
Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million years to go from rough
flaked stone tools to smooth ones. You could hardly notice any change.
We have come from square one to going to Mars in only some 200,000 years.
If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are explained easily.
If we ignore this body of information as we read out and work with the
human genome we handicap ourselves unnecessarily and deprive ourselves
of valuable clues and understanding. Darwinian principles may generally apply
to hominid species before us but they clearly do not apply to our unique
synthetic genesis and subsequent development except as a minor theme in
our climatic and incidental regional adaptations.
If the Anunnaki were interested only in engineering
what clearly amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably
be inferred that the completeness of the engineering would not have
to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this
author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and
defects we present. It has been argued, theoretically, that, although
the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only
a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative
complexity of our organism. However, we are not that much more complex
genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not
hold.
Sociobiology, as introduced and propounded by E. O.
Wilson, is founded on Darwinian evolutionary theory, and the
"unappealing proposition" that genetic variation and chance are
the only cause for the existence of human kind, inferring a complete
biological determinism. There is difficulty, however, in accounting
for the disconcertingly rapid accelerations obvious in our species’
brief history in which the slow genetic mutational and chance factors
have been rapidly outrun by our cultural and consciousness developments.
It may well be that we are totally determined in our action and thought
by our biology but the very fact that we can recognize that possibility
and discuss it begs the question How then are we determined? Wilson’s
honesty causes him to acknowledge that we have reached a point where we
can consciously influence the course of our evolution. The new paradigm
affords a context and perspective in which to understand our species’
precocity in terms of the rapid ascendance or our advanced Anunnaki genetic
base. We can return to the subject of man's ultimate nature with confidence,
freedom to radically experiment and explore with understanding and humor.
The same reductionistic science that would honestly insist that we are
totally determined by an infinitely regressive loop of ultimately quantum
mechanical events is already telling us that we are determined to transcend
in an infinitely progressive loop of fractal like expansions. If we are totally
determined, we are clearly determined to determine our own determinism.
The fact that we have modified since our inception
according to Darwinian adaptations to general climatic, regional
and cultural vectors becomes a minor theme in the overview of ourselves
as the precocious leading edge of a synthesized species metamorphosing
rapidly, driven by our bicameral genetic engine. The “unappealing
proposition” loses its sting: the truth, regardless of its content,
tends to set one free. The new paradigm explains completely the seeming
anomalies of acceleration, ooparts and syncretisms so apparent in the
human situation, and is a definitive explanation of why our species’
"biological evolution is always quickly outrun by cultural change".
A Planetary
Focus for the Genome Project and Genetic Research
Immortality is a pivotal topic in all considering and
learning from all phases of the Anunnaki-human history. We know,
directly from the records, of their decisions that the Anunnaki did
not give us the relatively extreme longevity or immortality they possessed
by conscious deliberate decision. It did not fit their purposes:
we were invented as slave workers. The records also show, however,
that, over time, a handful of humans were granted immortality also
by deliberate decision as a reward for being good subordinates in various
roles usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out some critical mission.
Another lesson: there may well be identifiable gene sequences that control
the aging and dying process that are clearly and definitely manipulatable
giving indication that we will be able to rectify their possible deliberate
suppression.
During the genetic investigations now in process, therefore,
it would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to
be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs
of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if
needed, as well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so,
interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress
accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved.
The information gained would be, reciprocally, a major, pivotal, invaluable
resultant spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological,
and cultural generic history. Understanding our bicameral gene code
in the context of the new paradigm will facilitate the elimination of
the schizoid puzzles in our collective and individual psyches and the
correction and perfecting of our genetics.
Immortality,
An Emergent Wild Card
If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored
history, however, things make a great deal more sense although,
for now, there may not be a planetary cure or relief for some of them.
If we recognize that we are the product of a genetically engineered
melding of two quite different gene codes, literally a bicameral
species, displaying a decidedly non-Darwinian kind of evolutionary
development, just now beginning to step out of racial adolescence,
only now beginning to grasp our racial psychology, possessing a gene
code that, significantly and disconcertingly, manifests four thousand
and counting potential genetic defects, struggling desperately with
a short life span and certain mortality, we will know precisely who
and what we are. By enabling us to break the godspell we are
freed to collectively work toward planetarily common goals in genetic
science: the correction of the defects in our genetic code, the elimination
of diseases in all of mankind, the providing of the option of immortality
to all.
In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize
from the outset that immortality will be both a new and awesome
plateau of human existence offering as yet probably undreamed potential
and yet, without denigrating that potential at all, ultimately just
another "trip", just another step in our meta-evolution, the rapid
metamorphosis we have been undergoing since our beginning. Within
those extremes there is the greatest latitude for the inevitable expansion
into dimensions which will allow us to become far wiser, individually,
through greater experience, greater learning, and the ability to witness
the patterns of repetitions of extended periodicity. Eliminating the
pressure of a short life span that influences our choices and cramps our
lives will not just give us the practical potential to travel easily between
star systems and send the insurance companies into the re-edit mode; it
will change our perspective and our social interactions, certainly the
entirety of human existence, radically.
Beyond Religion
and The Old New Age
Imagine,
even no religion,
They say I’m a dreamer,
But I’m not the only one.
John Lennon
Religion, as we know it, is the transmutation of the
Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery
and then limited, subservient partnership, the godspell. The concept
of God, capital G, has gradually developed through the cosmification
of the various Anunnaki rulers Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH), Enki (Adonai,
the Lord), Allah (El/Nannar/Sin), among others, gradually embellished
with the heady concepts of metaphysical speculation. It has lately
become a sort of faux ecumenical gloss: the TV news quotes the Koran
as saying “There is no God but God” when it should be “There is no god
but Allah”, a completely different meaning. The god of the Judeo-Roman
Christian tradition, Jehovah YHWH was – quite possibly still is -- the
flesh and blood Anunnaki individual, Enlil, eventually cosmified into
the absolute creator of the universe, eventually spoken of as infinite
love, infinite justice, infinite this or infinite that, through the bishops
and the scholastic philosophers and theologians.
Many who do not realize this crucial distinction, do not want to,
or are not ready to, take refuge in the Big-G little-g syndrome,
a sort of halfway shelter on the way to genetic enlightenment.
That position is articulated as, “I see the real historical nature
of the “gods”, the little “g’s”, but that does not shake my belief
in a Big G”. That way they can still subscribe to the platitudes
that the “God of all religions” is beyond individual doctrinal differences
and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the same
God” and similar inane notions. The new paradigm affords us the opportunity
to sort all these elements out, identify the different individual real
gods of the various religions, place them and ourselves in historical
perspective and recognize the metaphysical conceptualizations of “deity”,
East and West, as a product of our own evolving racial psychology.
Yes, the new paradigm means that religion and religions,
as we know them, will have to bow out. The godspell phenomenon has
two parts: we need to overcome the slave mentality of dependence and
subservience and we need to discard the institutional religions which
sprang from and dominated through it, especially the radical fundamentalism,
West and East, that is ultimately tearing the race apart. The role
of the theologian then becomes the facilitating of planetary reconciliation
in the transition to the time beyond religion.
The institutional, slave-code, godspell religions,
have fixed dogmas which are directly contradicted by the new paradigm.
They claim divine franchise by gods who are now radically redefined.
They claim absolute authority over the disciplines that produce the
information that would demonstrate their true historical nature. The
ultimate driving force will most probably be a degree of desperation
and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the entire planetary population
so strong that it will cause an abandonment of the authoritarian leaders
and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger generation of clerics
who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new interpretations and
relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and transition, hopefully
to humanitarian organizations and peace movements. The signs of
transition of some religious organizations to charitable and ecological
focus may be seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of transformation.
It would also be foolish not to expect diehard fundamentalist backlash.
Is this atheism? No, paradoxically, not as such. Not
as we have defined atheism previously as the denial of the existence
of any kind of god, cosmic or otherwise. It simply is a long overdue
correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively
rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden variety atheism can
now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion
and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid
characteristics of whatever sublimated local Anunnaki "god" is still the
object of worship (the original meaning of worship was “work for”: AVOD
= work). Yes, the subservient godspell religious stage will be surpassed.
The resultant freedom, however, will engender and foster greater
curiosity about reality and a seeking for ultimate causes far more metaphysically
adequate and commensurate with our expanding consciousness far beyond
even the search for the Law of Everything. The element of transcendence
associated with some religions will be, at minimum, understood
as generic consciousness expansion into higher and higher dimensionality.
Neither is this materialistic reductionism although
it does force us to reconsider the notion of the “spiritual”. What
is needed is a complete overhaul of all our metaphors and concepts
of the “spiritual” because the great majority of them are embedded
in our cultural fabric and consciousness as leftovers from Judeo-Roman
Catholic theology and second hand Eastern philosophies. The importance
of this overhaul is critical because it involves the concepts of mind,
consciousness, intelligence, will, self-awareness, transcendence,
dimensionality, self.
Beyond The
Babel Factor: Human Over-Unity
The Current
Grand Moment
Science, the closest we have come to a common ground,
a common criterion, has played and will continue to play a pivotal
role in the recognition and acceptance of the new worldview.
Astronomy will demonstrate the existence of the tenth
planet unequivocally --- the IRAS, Infrared Imaging Satellite, quite
obviously discovered it in ‘83-’84 --- and, reluctantly, recognize
the correspondence of the details gradually accumulated with the ancient
data we now possess. The curiosity about the existence of the Anunnaki
on Nibiru/Planet X will become overwhelming and contact through spacecraft
and signaling will commence.
Archaeology, for the last one hundred and fifty years,
has been making the major contributions of data and will continue
to do so. Only recently, the science of genetics has been
able to refine, sometimes correct, archaeological and anthropological
estimates and dating. Because of the intertwining of the archaeological
and genetic information concerning our unique genesis, genetics has
already and should continue to be a major tool and contributing science
to the new paradigm.
The more robust the scientific information becomes
the easier it will be for the religions of the world to accept and
incorporate. Nations and cultures as well will see the cogency
of the information and gradually accept it, becoming gradually
more planetary in outlook.
In the name of world unity and peace, governments and
contributing entities should increase funding of the scientific
searches and research in these disciplines and adopt policies that
will release the information, some of it quite certainly withheld
at this time, already possessed.
Gardner’s
Contribution: Western Culture Revisited
This strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism eventually
became known as heterodox Christian (the word Christian was not coined
until almost four hundred years later) was opposed by the Pauline branch
which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church.
The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the slave-code fear and subservience
tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the
human centered strain of the bloodline. The reason why women have always
been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline
was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any
recognition of them would be recognition of the line. This is a further
elucidation of our genetic background. It is manifestly unjust that
the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the
genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning
in archaeology. We are the product of that Nefilim technology, a mutant
species with bicameral genetics, bicameral mind. We can finally integrate
both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus component will bring us back
to harmony with this planet, making it a nice place to live and a nice
place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach us how to move off planet
gracefully. The word from station DNA is these "gods" wear designer genes.
Part 3
The New Human
Let us postulate that we have broken the godspell, we have arrived
at a consensual, planetary, understanding and definition of the generic
human as a genetically engineered species now coming out of racial adolescence
into species first maturity, the individual cognizant of the ability
to control and direct the nature and trajectory of his and her own personal
evolution and able and expected to contribute to the collective consciousness
and determination of the racial evolutionary trajectory.
The awareness and comprehension of this fundamental, generic,
racial self knowledgeI have called genetic enlightenment. By "genetic
enlightenment" I mean what it is like once you have broken the godspell,
the deepest dye in the fabrics of both Eastern and Western culture.
Many seemingly enigmatic items are resolved and there is a great deal
to be done. It becomes immediately clear that we can move beyond both
eastern and western metaphor; beyond religion, atheism, the old
new age; beyond Jungian archetypal and mythological interpretation, beyond
our strange, dangerous and contradictory mix of mammalian, turfish, violent
theo-political politics and compassionate ideals. We will finally be ready
for alien contact and interaction and matriculation into stellar society.
We can reach a planetary unity we have never known before and a peace so
profound it will be almost humorous. How long will it take?
Probably as long as we have lived under our Constitution.
The Trajectory of Realevolution
Once the locked-in, slave-code legacies and the conflicts they
engender, both species wise and in the individual, are seen for what
they really are, it becomes clear that the thrust, the direction, of
our Realevolution is toward greater and greater expansion of freedom, compassion,
understanding, cooperation, intelligence, consciousness, dimensional
perception, conscious personal and species orchestration and control.
It raises and enhances the individual’s level of importance, the scope
of the individual’s choices and enlarges the arena of exploration. It
points towards immortality and beyond, to transforms of our nature hardly
imaginable now. The message is that liberated human nature and existence
is open ended, forward creative, poetic, rhapsodic, expanding, exciting
and enticing.
The Demographics of Our Realevolution
IQ Meets CQ....and EQ?
Once recognizing the nature and direction of our realevolution
we will be positioned to understand the details of its mechanism.
The current agenda of the DNA intelligence is to produce neurological
systems that can use themselves as an instrument and bodies sophisticated
enough to house them. There are a number of survival functions necessary
to protect, preserve, and further that goal and the species. These functions
are accomplished by specific gene pools of individuals. Individual,
personal realevolution recapitulates the realevolution of our species
and this involves the individual moving through different gene pools at
different ages and stages. Education is most effectively accomplished
in gene pool contexts at the time the child, adolescent or adult is evolving
through or specializing in a particular gene pool.
IQ, intelligent quotient is defined in realevolutionary terms
as an estimate of the degree of proficiency of an entity to receive,
process, transmit information from external and internal sources, testable
and measurable against a relative peer scale.
Just as one can test to determine if an entity possesses some
degree of intelligence so one can test to determine if an entity has
some degree of consciousness. Just as with intelligence, once determined
in an entity, one can devise relative criteria and scales to measure
the extent of the spectrum of awarenesses and the degree and focus of
each kind of awareness, its integration and the degree of conscious use
by the entity of its input and data. Let us call this the consciousness
quotient: CQ.
How primitive are we still? Tests for a consciousness quotient,
CQ, do not seem to be a concept with which our collective consciousness
is comfortable just yet. Not just a test to determine a verifiable state
of awareness. Not just a test to see if we can be Turinged by some program
or entity. A test of consciousness quotient would determine the entire
range of awarenesses of the entity, human or otherwise, and the degree
of development and intensity, quality and focus of each part of that
spectrum.
The democratic ideal is twisted with regard to consciousness
as it is with IQ. Yes, all humans are created equal as far as their human
rights are concerned but we all don’t have the same abilities or degrees
of capabilities or intelligence or consciousness. Somehow, such a recognition
is seen by some to be less than politically correct, or a denigration
of some individuals.
How primitive are we? If the notion of a CQ is touchy, try EQ,
an individual’s evolutionary quotient, and a relative scale measure of
an individual’s evolutionary development and potential. We continually
make ad hoc judgments, many times for the sake of our own security and
safety, about the relatively evolved or devolved physical, mental and
consciousness characteristics and signals of others just as we are doing
continually about their manifest IQ. A parent or teacher or psychologist
expects a statement like “This person has a higher IQ than that person”
to be sophisticated and socially acceptable. If, however, one dares broach
the notion of a consciousness quotient, CQ, communicatory flags go up; there
is disconcertion, confusion, and even conflict. Advance the concept
of an EQ, an evolutionary developmental quotient, and things get really
squirrelly. Once we are adjusted to the concept of the individual, from conception
on, recapitulating the stages of species evolution, we will begin to take
the notions of CQ and EQ as given. We will need them to recognize
the developmental stage of a child or adult in order to determine in which
gene pool context he or she should be educated in or contribute to at that
point, thereby most effectively promoting and accelerating her or his personal
realevolution.
The recognition that the stages of realevolution are stages
of conscious evolution will facilitate the resolution of the perennial
academic problem involving other than “normal” states of consciousness.
At this primitive stage, we cannot even agree on what constitutes the
real or “legitimate” elements of the spectrum of human consciousness. If
an investigator’s paradigm --- or consciousness --- does not happen to
have the capacity for some perception, sensitivity or ability, its reality
is often denied, a priori, in other humans. It may not even be admitted
for testing or the investigation turned into an inquisition using magicians
as the inquisitors instead of Dominican monks in the public square of
some “learning” channel. We argue about the reality of various kinds of
extrasensory perception, non-local communication, transcendental states,
and perceivable dimensionalities and never seem to be able to come to definitive
conclusions --- unless, of course, the Pentagon needs remote viewers. Consciousness
in, consciousness out. Once we have understood realevolution as essentially
a process of consciousness development, the paranormal modalities will be
recognized as advanced, evolved functions along the realevolutionary trajectory.
Timothy Leary, Ph.D., the Tesla of psychology, developed an
elegant schema to identify the types of consciousness at each stage
of realevolution, past, present and coming. I have included a summary
of it as Appendix B. It is
a road and flight map of realevolution. Note well the simple but
profound advice: “The answer to all human problems is to recognize your
genetic stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and
in that secure place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably
awaiting you.”
We need institutions and governments that are built intrinsically
on and for those characteristics, to support and further the evolution
of the species and the individual as a primary function. The structure
of constitutions and laws should promote the greatest degree of freedom
of expansion and exploration by the individual and the species.
Well, you say, here in the U. S., the Constitution is an advanced
and enlightened document, which has solved many of those problems,
at least in this country. I submit that the Constitution, certainly advanced
and relatively enlightened when it was conceived and put in place, was
an ingenious solution, created by deists, for maintaining some semblance
of peace between the Colonial religious factions, restraining the religious
mayhem always under the surface. However, there is no indication of any
anticipation that there would ever be a resolution of those differences,
no anticipation of a common definition and understanding of human nature.
The Constitution, as unique and effective as it is as a set of rules of
order in a primitive situation, has become a locked-in legacy. It barely
continues to balance the powers, long term, and prevent the takeover of
the government and imposition of theocracy or fascism.
The extraordinary element remaining is the seed of evolutionary
suggestion clearly intended by its authors as expressed by Jefferson
when he said:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and
constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the
progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened,
as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions
change. With the change of circumstances, institutions must advance
also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to
wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to
remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
A planetarily consensual conception of the generically human
will enable us to derive improved forms of constitutions and develop
systems of representation of individual input and voting far more adequate
and accurate than our current systems of representation by strangers.
That would be a first step. They will render outmoded our current systems
that are modeled, to one degree or another on the residue of slave-code
religious rules. They will be determined democratically by direct input
from the entire population and constructed to further and abet the realevolution
of the individual and the species. We, in the U.S., are in need of a second
Constitution. To that purpose I have included a proposal in Appendix C. The essence of
the proposal is that we now have a tool, through the relatively awesome
power of the electronic medium, in the “open source” approach to programming
and system development that will afford us a means to moving beyond outmoded
representative government by the mediocracy to far more intelligent forms
by direct input by each citizen.
It is evident that the current serious crisis of world peace
is largely due to the “my god is better than your god” conflicts, the
sad playing out of the same kind of wars in which we were used as pawns
by the Anunnaki. The second major factor is economic: competition
for limited resources which is further exacerbated by the corruption
of the powerful oppressing the weak. How primitive are we? We need
only examine every economic system attempted or implemented through
history to comprehend that all forms, to this point, have been successful
only to a point in limited circumstances. Every serious economic and
political structuring has proven to have benefits but equally serious
limitations and drawbacks due to conflicts over what and who a human
individual is and, therefore, what the rights of the individual
are relative to other humans and the state; what is considered moral,
just; whether there should be winners and losers; who should be
taken care of and why; and, to put it in modern academic jargon,
who is the “other”. Certainly, the potential for human degeneracy is always
extant and partly at cause, but the more fundamental Babel-factoring of
our species still hinders us from taking conscious part in our realevolution
which is on schedule regardless. The new paradigm will, eventually, see
our political and economic systems as mirroring our rapid though confused
realevolutionary stages and consciously and intelligently and compassionately
developing evolving, dynamic systems commensurate with our now and future
trajectory. Artificial intelligence, ironically, will probably
have to be used to determine rapidly adjusting economic systems
for the benefit of all.
It's All Over For The Current Consensual
Worldview
Actually, it has been "all over"
for some time now. Several works by various authors may be noted as
turning point markers just previous to the introduction of Sitchin's thesis.
Joseph Campbell's master work, The Masks of God, surveyed
and elucidated the entire field of mythology. He accepted the basic
premise that the "gods" were mythological. However, he was compelled to question
the basic working premise of mythology that mythology had arisen through the
naive proto-"science" of early human minds attributing human characteristics
on the sun, moon, stars, and the phenomena of nature: storms, lightning,
winds, etc. He found very signicant the fact that the genealogies
of the "gods" were the same in India as they were in the Norse countries ----
the names were different because of the difference in languages but the genealogical
relationships were identical ---- and had to conclude that something
had begun in the "little Sumerian mud garden" and spread to the rest
of the world. This was totally contradictory of the working premise
of then and current mythology but he let it go at noting its significance.
This was a demarcation for the introduction of Sitchin's radical paradigm.
In 1976 Julian Jaynes of Princeton published his The Origin of Consciousness
In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, examining the evolution of human
consciousness in an erudite study that covered the classics, mythology,
archaeology, religion and history. He accepted the unquestioned
premise that the "gods" were mythological as did Campbell. He concludes
that, because previous to 1250 B.C. humans claimed to talk to the gods, get
instructions from them, hear them speak, worked for them, all
men previous to that turning point in time, must have been hallucinating
schizophrenes because, the gods being unreal, mythic, they must have been
hearing them in their heads (!!). In retrospect , Jaynes' work can
be seen as the last extreme effort to make professional, academic sense out
of the puzzling history where the only two choices were the gods were imaginary,
mythic or they were real. it took Sitchin to provide the definitive
validity of the "real" choice.
Sitchin first published also in 1976 and has produced some nine volumes
since.
In 1996 Samuel P. Huntington published The Clash of Civilizations and the
Remaking Of World Order. Mr. Huntington presents a paradigm of global
politics in terms of the interactions between civilizations, a "civilizational"
approach, with the intention or providing insight into how to avoid
the clashes between civilizations which he sees as the greatest threat to
world peace and, conversely, how "an international order based on civilizations
is the surest safeguard against world war".
To bring it down to the here and now: if America, or any country
or culture is going to be an example for the rest of the world, there
is no other choice but for it to set a Realevolutionary example and style.
It will require thinkers and scholars and innovators and futants from
every discipline in every culture and country and religion to assimilate
the vast amount of history, information, ooparts, traditions and technology
which have been rediscovered and recovered over the last one hundred
and fifty years from all parts of the world and to transform their religions
and cultures accordingly. How long will it take? The view from 2100 (A.D.)
sees it only begun in the 21st century and not totally completed by 2200.
Consciousness In, Consciousness
Out
Specifically, concerning the question as to whether Artificial
Intelligence can actually be achieved and how we should go about
it, our history is a strong source of a positive answer. The Anunnaki,
even while here, according to the recovered records of their deeds and
interactions, besides genetically inventing humans, quite clearly had
developed robots and androids, some of the latter being so sophisticated
that, it is written, it was difficult to tell one from a human or an
Anunnaki. We can profit from the Anunnaki’s experience in both creating
a new species and in their development and use of robots and sophisticated
androids as well as the awesome invention of a species such as we.
The realization of our half-alien genetic makeup and our relationship
to the Anunnaki stretches our perspective to afford an effective way
for us to begin to grasp the topic of alien presence on this planet.
It also enables a, previously unattainable, unassailable integrity individually
and as a race which will be essential to entering into direct contact
with alien species, either in the future or with ones that are already
here on the planet. We shall finally enter stellar society as a mature
race which knows who and what it is, what is good for it and what is not;
with whom or what it could interact, with whom and what it would be dangerous
to make contact; with the minimum of preconceptions as to how things should
be. Until we know who and what we are we will probably not be allowed into
stellar society. Until we break the godspell and stop looking up for Daddy
to come back, looking for some solution or salvation from outside, we will
be in danger of getting Borged by whomever shows up here. The topic of alien
contact is probably the most dramatic of examples of how narrow and primitive
our focus is. It is a fact and the gradual insinuation of it into our collective
consciousness has progressed in the last fifty years.
A Retrospective View From 2100
With the demise of godspell religions and the dawning of a generic,
planetary, definition of human nature the social context and educational
process will undergo a profound revolution. The orientation will not
be to a creationist or a Darwinian evolutionary context but to
a generic, planetarily common realevolutionary context. We will be finally
free to understand our common species predecessors and our bicameral species
heritage in perspective. That perspective will afford us the detailed
information concerning the stages of developmental realevolution we have
passed through to this point. We will be able to understand and utilize
the realevolutionary map of those stages as laid out by Leary in the first-of-its-kind
schema in Appendix B and even better ones to follow.
The awareness of the historical stages and trajectory of
realevolution will make us conscious of the agenda of DNA, of our genetic
coding: survival and ever increasing conscious control over our
own existence. We might say that we are totally determined to determine
our own determination. Gene pools (groups throughout the population
that are predominantly programmed for certain functions for survival
of the species) will be recognized for what they are and valued.
Once conscious of the nature and purpose of these specialized populations
and how they map on to the stages of realevolution we will see that we
may move from gene pool to gene pool, adsorbing the ancient wisdom of
each for survival and personal learning and expansion. Moving from gene
pool to gene pool will be a natural process of an individual’s unique personal
realevolutionary process. There will be a mutual respect and positive recognition
between gene pools beyond just tolerance, and the only rule necessary
will be a consensually agreed prohibition of any gene pool doing anything
that will harm or obstruct the function of another gene pool. The gene pool
golden rule. It also brings us full circle around to the children, us in
the future. I project a realevolutionary scenario for the treatment and
education of the children of the 21st century to develop as follows.
A further refinement of the gene pool concept will be its incorporation
into the educational process: the stages of the recapitulatory developmental
process of the human child will be mapped onto the various gene pools
but without assigning hierarchical ranking to them. A child will have
the opportunity to experience the best features of the various phases
of human evolutionary experimentation. The quintessence of the hunter,
the gatherer, the agriculturist cultures presented by those steeped and
expert in the context will put the student in tune with deep genetic roots,
survival methods, cooperation and creativity. The crafts, industrial, mechanical,
engineering, construction, building gene pools; the arts, literary,
musical pools; the military, police, and civil servant gene pools all
have some essence of their orientation to reality to offer as insight
into a facet of human nature and ingenuity. The domestic, child-bearing
and rearing, cooperative, social, political, educational, pools will
certainly all contribute to the recapitulatory phases of a child’s development,
each at its proper time.
The children will be encouraged to be their own philosophers
from the earliest age according to their capacity at any age and stage.
They will be encouraged to make their own decisions about reality and
to explore and follow their own unique evolutionary development and to
respectfully make their unique contribution to the ongoing conversation
about the ideal trajectory of our collective species’ evolution. Language,
reason, logic will be understood to be a product of certain stages of
our realevolutionary perception of three dimensional reality. They will
be taught the nature of reality in the most expanded scientific and philosophical
context we know, and introduced to the concept of action which enhances others
while it enhances us. They will be enabled to continue the process of personal
realevolution on their own. In peace.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell,
the looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude, the,
deepest dye in the fabrics of all cultures? In the immediate future,
the god games we shall play as our own evolutionary artists are immortality
; self directed, conscious evolution; four-dimensional consciousness;
life under a law of everything; practical transcendence; the development
of AI as a subordinate species and for use in surrogate operations. For
starters. Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim, withheld from
humans, will be transformed, from “religious” afterlife reward to the
dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation.
We will be our own "gods", our own genetic credentials, play our own god
games with an unassailable species identity enabling us to step confidently
into stellar society.
But what of us individually? Once the ancient, subservient godspell
is dispelled we are freed, individually, to go one on one with the
universe. We will operate as our own "gods", according to our own genetic
credentials, play our own god games according to our own transcendental
choices, creating our own confident realities. We will perfect systematic
self-supersedure as a means of conscious evolution to an art form.
The characteristics that mark the new human are an unassailable
personal integrity, relativistic epistemology, profound compassion,
robust depth of informational data, understanding of the universe in
terms of a full unified field, broad-spectrum competence, transcendental
competition, facility in dimensional shifting, preference for dyadic operation,
a profound ability to enjoy, to play the games most enjoyable and satisfying
to generic "gods", an expanded capacity to literally have great fun creating
new realities, with the primary focus on the multi-dimensional. And to
play those “god” games in the context of relative immortality and, eventually,
habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
We have at hand the cumulative data and information to initiate
the planetary unification process. Let us make it so for the children.
To HiddenMysteries Internet Book Store
This is a publication of TGS Services - Hiddenmysteries.org
Please direct all correspondence to
TGS HiddenMysteries, c/o TGS Services,
22241 Pinedale Lane, Frankston, Texas, 75763
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
LifeTravellers ~
Reptilian Agenda ~ Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site
All Rights Reserved
We welcome challenging viewpoints from all sources...even opposing viewpoints. In diversity of views we can still find the research and documentation valuable, whether we agree with the views of the author or not.