
Update:
By Ann Earle
In 1992, Robert Kelly, Jr., co-owner along with his wife Betsy of the Little Rascals Day Care Center in Edenton, North Carolina, was convicted on 99 counts of child abuse and sentenced to twelve consecutive life sentences.
Kelly, his wife, and five employees were charged with abusing 29 children in 1989. These charges led to the longest and most expensive trial in North Carolina history lasting nine months and costing $1.5 million dollars. It brought national attention to this small town and split its citizens down the middle with some choosing to believe the children and others claiming the children’s stories with ritualistic overtones were "unbelievable" and the Kelly’s were subjects of a "witchhunt."
Subsequent to Kelly'’s conviction, another employee, Don Wilson, was also convicted and Betsy Kelly plead "no contest."
In May of this year, the North Carolina Court of Appeals overturned the convictions on legal technicalities. In early September, the Supreme Court refused to review the Appeal Court’s decision and, on September 22nd, Kelly was released on $200,000 bond. It is now up to the Chowan County District Attorney whether to drop the charges or to retry the case. At the time of Kelly’s release, the District Attorney stated his intention to retry. A new trial will probably feature the testimony of ten and eleven year old children who were only toddlers at the time they allegedly suffered the abuse.
Another consideration for the prosecutors and the child victims and their families is the growing influence on the legal system and public opinion currently enjoyed by The False Memory Syndrome Foundation. Despite these obstacles, at least one parent said he would assist the prosecution in a new trial.
Aside from the children and their parents, others are deeply disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision not to consider the reversals of the Appeal Court. Superior Court Judge Marsh McLelland, who heard the Little Rascal’s case the first time, wrote in a letter to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court: "Your refusal to review the Kelly and Wilson reversals by the Court of Appeals is legally and morally reprehensible." Judge McLelland has stated he will not hear the case again.
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
![]()