Open Letter to Bill Douglas regarding Carol Valentine's paper on Phil Berg and the Ellen Mariani 9/11 lawsuit:
Mike Ruppert is probably the most visible 911 researcher in the world. It is well known that he has many members of Congress including Dennis Kucinich on his newsletter subscription. Therefore it *is* odd that Phil did not reply to Mike's questions and ceased communicating with him. Put yourself in Phil Berg's position. What would you do if you were asked by Ruppert to answer simple questions about the lawsuit, questions born of hard-earned experience?
Especially when Ruppert promised to "promote the heck out of" the story. All I can say is if I were Berg, I would immediately go do the research on Mike, find out his background and contact list, then, realizing the kind of access he had, I would move his questions to the absolute top of my priority list, getting the answers done by next morning. Maybe Phil was busy is not an excuse. He NEVER responded, not at all.
But there may be something I don't know. I am not saying that Phil is doing this by design, but there is nothing wrong with critiquing a lawyer's performance on a case as big and as important as this. Phil is again copied on this letter and I hope he will give us some understanding of his actions, because there is always another side to the story.
You must acknowledge that Mariani's case really belongs to all of us, because we were all destroyed by the attack on 9/11. Therefore to suggest that only those who are blindly and uncritically jubilant about anything done by the lawyer on the case is a recipe for disaster, as Mike so perfectly puts it in his response to your allegations about Carol. No leader can lead without input from the community. No leader can be idolized without beginning to believe his own faultlessness, which is the path to fault itself. You and Phil Berg must, if you are seeking the mantle of leadership in the 9/11 community, respond with integrity and genuine concern to questions from the people. To do otherwise is to lose our support.
It is also important to note that action without understanding is not necessarily effective. I do not disapprove of your work or your action messages, but I prefer to take action once I am satisfied that I understand the situation well.
My father's family is Jewish, but I do not resent Carol's anti-Zionist slant because she has meticulously documented her statements and while it is arguable she might choose her words more carefully, she is also exercising her rights to free speech and I can understand her concerns about the tenets of radical Zionism and Talmudic Judaism. Even in the Torah, the book of Joshua gives supposedly "God-given" rights to the Jews to kill "other" people in the desire to take the land of Canaan for themselves. It is important for us to understand that people like Ariel Sharon call on the spirit of Joshua to legitimize their undertakings. That is why Carol's work is not irrelevant to an understanding of what happened on 9/11 and in which direction we should investigate. Those of us like myself who could be targeted in anti-Semitic attacks often emphasize the difference between Zionism and Judaism. Some, like myself, also emphasize the difference between the different messages of the prophets in the Old Testament. Some of the prophets gave us messages of peace and connection to the One God. Others gave us messages of war and hierarchical rulership and overwhelming numbers of sometimes obscene laws regarding daily actions. One great Jewish prophet, while not regarded as the Messiah by Judaism, gave us the Golden Rule: Do unto others.
Jewish people, like Christians, have the right, indeed the responsibility, to choose the essence of their religion based on their personal criteria for legitimate religious doctrine. Carol is doing a terrific job of showing just how insidious the Zionist agenda really is. As you may know, "By way of deception, thou shalt make war" is the motto of the Mossad. Israel's many attacks on other nations for which they have tried to blame Arabs necessitates an examination of the probable involvement of Israel in the 9/11 attacks and also demands an understanding of the religious and philosophical justification that is likely behind such action. Just as many in America sought to understand the mindset of jihadists in the Muslim world after 9/11, many of us not so sure it was in fact Islamic, have decided it is equally important to understand the mindset of Zionist jihadists and the religious doctrines that support and underpin it.
We also must acknowledge that there is a Zionist cabal within the leadership of this administration. Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle, Abrams, Libby, Zakheim, Fleischer and others constitute a full-on Zionist powerbase within the current administration. They are also supported in their enterprise by Zionist and Jewish American businessman such as Larry Silverstein, Howard Rubinstein, Michael Eisenberg, Keith Rupert (Rupert Murdoch), Edgar Bronfman, Frank Lowy, Murray Rothstein (Sumner Redstone) and many others.
It is common knowledge among those who have done the research that the Jewish people are one of the sacrificial lambs of the Zionists. They do not care whose people are sacrificed in the end, as long as their dream is realized: to control the world from Jerusalem (witness the Masonic Pyramid with the all-seeing Eye (top left in photo) on top of the Supreme Court of Israel) within "Eretz (Greater) Israel" from the Nile to the Euphrates:
So you see, to call Carol Valentine's website anti-Semitic is to attack the same freedom of speech that you so famously extol in your diatribe against the Federal Government and the "Free Speech Zones." Are you going to create Free Speech Zones within the 9/11 movement? Not on my watch. Calling Jews kikes or making fun of our noses, or that type of racist slur is different from making sincere points about the dangers of a doctrine that recognizes one race of people as better than another. The supreme irony of those who call people like Carol Valentine anti-Semitic is that they are often supporters of an ideology that is openly racist: Zionism and some Judaic doctrines.
And finally you have yet to explain your claim that you had never heard from Carol: "I don't know the woman, she never tried to contact me," while Carol easily and readily produced evidence to the contrary. You don't make yourself look reliable and fair this way. Furthermore, those quick to attack others as "operatives" make themselves look suspicious when it turns out they have made false claims themself.
And which "key people...turn[ed] away from 9-11 truth facts" as a result of Carol's allegations regarding the complicity of Israel and the Zionists? It would very interesting to know.
You see, the history of anti-authoritarian movements is rife with COINTELPRO type operations designed to divert movements into acceptable forms of protest. It is certainly plausible that you are working to divert 9/11 activists from the role of Israel and towards more Israel-acceptable protests against Bush et al. You need to debunk such speculation through legitimate discourse, not epithet hurling. You are perhaps aware that Israel bugged Clinton's office and taped the Monical Lewinsky phone calls. You may also be aware that the Israeli companies Comverse and Amdocs have a record of destroying FBI investigations because they control the wire-tapping infrastructure in the United States. Perhaps you are also aware of the argument in R. Joseph's book that
"...unfortunately for the Bush administration, somebody else was "listening." and they know all about the cover up and they know exactly what Bush and team knew. The phones lines of the FBI, CIA, and the White House were tapped. And now, the government of Israel not only has Bush by the ----, but in March they began to squeeze--as witnessed by the sudden reversal of U.S. policy in the Middle East, and Bush's proclamation that Ariel Sharon is a "man of peace."
An examination of the history of the IDF and Mossad reveals that they regularly have their operatives dress like Arabs when carrying out attacks, use terrorists for hire, and recruit Arabs under false-flag operations designed to make it look like Arabs were responsible. Instead, the Mossad was funding and designing the entire operation, in particular the aspects that their patsy Arabs would have no ability to carry off, such as stand-downs and media coverups. Why was it that Fox News' four part piece about the Israeli spyring in America and the five celebrating Israelis watching the smoking WTC was pulled from the website and buried? Did the Arabs do that too?
According to Andreas von Bulow, the former German Parliamentarian with whom Mike Ruppert has appeared in Germany:
Von Bulow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, is behind the September 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs, and boost military and security spending...At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion. The architectural level planners use corrupt "guns for hire" such as Abu Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist who von Bulow called "an instrument of Mossad," high-ranking Stasi (former East German secret service) operatives, or Libyan agents who organize terror attacks using dedicated people, for example Palestinian and Arab "freedom fighters." The terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bulow calls "the working level," such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on September 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said. "Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation," von Bulow said, which is widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said adding, "those who differ are labeled as crazy."
Just as important is the Zionist ideology, well summarized by Yitzhak Shamir, former Israeli Prime Minister:
"Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war... We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle. First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today..."
Perhaps the most damaging document is the leaked DEA dossier on the huge 200 strong Israeli spy ring in America.
These documents should convince any intelligent reader of the importance of examining the possible Zionist connection to the 9/11 terror attacks. There is much more evidence, and those with questions and interest in additional documentation are welcome to request it. Equating legitimate research and critique of those perhaps shielding the Zionists from public inquiry using the canard of anti-semitism is the typical attack of a people who are unashamedly racist, anti-Arab and anti-Gentile. Instead, those same people should be denouncing the racist Zionist doctrines and distancing themself from Jewish religious teachings that promote and allow racism.
R. Leland Lehrman
March 8, 2004
R. Leland Lehrman
815 Camino Don Emilio
Santa Fe, NM 87507
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.