~From the Reporter~
"To
heal a situation it must first be exposed
Once exposed it must be healed."
A SYNDROME a "collection of symptoms" -
What about if someone discovers that he or she has been
infected with the so called "HIV" virus?
The
information the infected person will receive from the medical doctor, nurse, or
other appointed health department officials will be that the HIV virus is the
sole cause of Aids.
And that over the years the final result will be the
breaking down of his or her immunity system.
The recommendation the
person will receive is to start taking the AZT drug or a similar cocktail in
order to prolong life and postpone death. A frightening and bleak prospect for
the person in question. In the coming years many more people worldwide will pay
a visit to their health departments or officials, as personal testing kits to
discover if someone has been or has not been infected with HIV will become more
and more available.
It may be better therefore to become your own Sherlok Holmes,
developing your skills as a private detective to unravel the truth.
You
won't usually get the following information from doctors or health officials:
1) Doctors Kill More People Than Guns and Traffic Accidents
Combined. Ooooops!
2) Doctors and official
health officials have not been trained in the Medical Schools to look for the
causes but to treat symptoms. Neither have they been educated how to maintain,
improve or recover the human immune system, other than by the treatment with
drugs or by the means of surgery.
3) They are blindly following the
guidelines of their Governmental Health Department which in its turn is
financing, following and supporting the guidelines of the World Health
Organisation which is maintained by the money collected from its citizens. (your
tax money?)
4) There is not one single scientific
document proving that HIV is the cause of AIDS, it is a HYPOTHESIS.
5)
It was reported in 1996, that there are 65 known "false positive triggers"
for HIV tests -- so how is it possible to know that people are infected and live
with "HIV", taking into consideration the false and dubious test
results?
(The false positive triggering conditions are included on this page.)
6) The recommendation of the drug
AZT or the cocktails not only kills the virus but also the healthy cells. In
other words, the treatment is to eliminate the virus while at the same time
endangering the life of the patient and adding the case to the statistics
published by the World Health Organisation. One could wonder if it would be more
appropriate to call the World Health Organisation the World Pharmaceutical
Organisation.
7) The world-wide brainwashing
propaganda that AIDS is being caused by a virus, is financed by the AIDS
establishment. The brilliant idea behind it is to first create a problem using
fear and afterwards offering the solutions. The deadly HIV virus being the
problem and the poisonous drugs, AZT, and the cocktails the solutions.
8) All other scientists, researchers,
publishers, individuals are constantly being censored and ridiculed in order to
avoid that people become aware of this assault on humanity.
9) The World Health Organisation,
according an article published in
1983, has been influenced and taken over by pharmaceutical interests,
playing the money game. This same World Health Organisation is also behind the
push for the global vaccination programs and the
fluoride propaganda
machine poisoning children, adults and the environment.
10)
Who knows but.... with the insistence of treating AIDS with toxic drugs, the
censorship to avoid other points of views, it looks as if the AIDS Establishment
is following the Global 2000 depopulation program, a global goal to
eliminate at least 50% of the world population.
Therefore we suggest you to become your own Sherlock Holmes, a good
detective, assuming your own responsibility by following your intuition.
"One of the intentions of
corporate-controlled media is to instill in people a sense of disempowerment, of
immobilisation and paralysis. Its outcome is to turn you into good, non-thinking
consumers. It is to keep people isolated, to feel that there is no possibility
for social change."
David Barsamian, journalist and publisher:
" The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to
strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate
within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views.
That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the
time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on
the range of the debate. "
Noam Chomsky, American linguist and US media and foreign policy critic
The AIDS files for you to discern;
World
Health or World Pharmaceutical Organisation?
Since
the Japanese Hiroshi Nakajima became top-ranking manager of the World Health
organisation last year changes have been dramatic over there. Pharmaceutical
industries are taking over rapidly. The headquarters in Geneva are quietly
changing into a sycophantic bureaucracy, where officials (Nakajima only wants
men) dare talk only in a whisper and anonymously. (translation of an article in
Vrij Nederland of 21 October 1989 by Rudie van Meurs)
WORLD HEALTH OR WORLD PHARMACEUTICAL ORGANISATION
Factors Known to Cause False Positive HIV Antibody Test
Results
The AIDS establishment has managed to convince
many people that the HIV antibody tests (ELISA, IFA and Western blot) are "99.5%
accurate". In this article Christine Johnson from HEAL Los Angeles, lists
conditions documented in the scientific literature known to cause positives on
these tests, and gives her references.
Since false-positives to every
single HIV protein have been documented (36), how do you know the positive WB
bands represent the various proteins to HIV, or just a collection of
false-positive bands reacting to several different non-HIV antibodies?
Factors Known to Cause False-Positive HIV
Antibody Test Results
* Anti-carbohydrate
antibodies (52, 19, 13)
* Naturally-occurring antibodies (5, 19)
* Passive
immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as prophylaxis
against infection which contains antibodies)(18, 26, 60, 4, 22, 42, 43, 13)
* Leprosy (2, 25)
* Tuberculosis (25)
* Mycobacterium avium (25)
* Systemic lupus erythematosus
(15, 23)
* Renal (kidney) failure (48, 23, 13)
* Hemodialysis/renal failure (56, 16, 41, 10, 49)
* Alpha
interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients (54)
* Flu (36)
* Flu vaccination (30, 11, 3, 20, 13, 43)
* Herpes
simplex I (27)
* Herpes simplex II (11)
*
Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)(11)
* Recent
viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines (11)
* Pregnancy
in multiparous women (58, 53, 13, 43, 36)
* Malaria (6, 12)
* High levels of circulating immune
complexes (6, 33)
* Hypergammaglobulinemia (high levels of
antibodies) (40, 33)
* False positives on other tests,
including RPR (rapid plasma reagent) test for syphilis (17, 48, 33, 10, 49)
* Rheumatoid arthritis (36)
* Hepatitis B vaccination (28, 21, 40, 43)
* Tetanus
vaccination (40)
* Organ transplantation (1, 36)
* Renal transplantation (35, 9, 48, 13, 56)
*
Anti-lymphocyte antibodies (56, 31)
* Anti-collagen antibodies (found in gay men, haemophiliacs, Africans of
both sexes and people with leprosy)(31)
* Serum-positive for
rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody (both found in rheumatoid arthritis and
other autoantibodies)(14, 62, 53)
* Autoimmune diseases (44, 29, 10, 40,
49, 43):
* Systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, connective tissue
disease, dermatomyositis Acute viral infections, DNA viral
infections (59, 48, 43, 53, 40, 13)
* Malignant neoplasms
(cancers)(40)
* Alcoholic hepatitis/alcoholic liver disease
(32, 48, 40,10,13, 49, 43, 53)
* Primary sclerosing cholangitis
(48, 53)
* Hepatitis (54)
* "Sticky"
blood (in Africans) (38, 34, 40)
* Antibodies with a high
affinity for polystyrene (used in the test kits)(62, 40, 3)
*
Blood transfusions, multiple blood transfusions (63, 36,13, 49, 43, 41)
* Multiple myeloma (10, 43, 53)
* HLA antibodies (to
Class I and II leukocyte antigens)(7, 46, 63, 48, 10, 13, 49, 43, 53)
* Anti-smooth muscle antibody (48)
* Anti-parietal cell antibody (48)
* Anti-hepatitis A IgM
(antibody)(48)
* Anti-Hbc IgM (48)
*
Administration of human immunoglobulin preparations pooled before 1985 (10)
* Haemophilia (10, 49)
* Haematologic malignant
disorders/lymphoma (43, 53, 9, 48, 13)
* Primary biliary cirrhosis (43, 53, 13, 48)
*
Stevens-Johnson syndrome9, (48, 13)
* Q-fever with associated
hepatitis (61)
* Heat-treated specimens (51, 57, 24, 49, 48)
* Lipemic serum (blood with high levels of fat or lipids)(49)
* Haemolyzed serum (blood where haemoglobin is separated from the
red cells)(49)
* Hyperbilirubinemia (10, 13)
*
Globulins produced during polyclonal gammopathies (which are seen in AIDS risk
groups)(10, 13, 48)
* Healthy individuals as a result of
poorly-understood cross-reactions (10)
* Normal human
ribonucleoproteins (48,13)
* Other retroviruses (8, 55, 14, 48,
13)
* Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (48, 13)
*
Anti-nuclear antibodies (48, 13, 53)
* Anti-microsomal
antibodies (34)
* T-cell leukocyte antigen antibodies (48, 13)
* Proteins
on the filter paper (13)
* Epstein-Barr virus (37)
* Visceral leishmaniasis (45)
* Receptive anal sex (39,
64)
AIDS TESTS (with the corresponding references)
HIV POSITIVE ? DEPENDS ON WHERE YOU LIVE...
THE
HIV WESTERN BLOT TEST
The HIV Western blot consists of a
thin nitrocellulose strip in which are embedded proteins claimed to be unique to
HIV. Each protein is labelled with a 'p' followed by its molecular weight in
thousands. Serum is added to the strip and if there are antibodies to a
particular protein this band will 'light up'.
The HIV Western
blot is not standardised and thus around the world different combinations of
bands are considered positive. Hence a positive test in one country is not
positive in another. An African would not be positive in Australia. A person
from the MACS would not be positive anywhere in the world including Africa.
Yet the HIV Western blot is considered to be highly specific and is considered
synonymous with HIV infection.
According to data presented in
Lundberg et al. (JAMA 260:674-679) when the US FDA criteria are used to
interpret the HIV Western blot less than 50% of US AIDS patients are HIV
positive whereas 10% of persons not at risk of AIDS are also positive by the
same criteria.
HIV WESTERN BLOT TEST
AZT is death.
By Celia Farber
Spin Aug. 1993
Celia Farber picks up the pieces of a shattered medical establishment
at the Ninth International Conference on AIDS in Berlin.
To anybody who has followed the literature on AZT throughout, this is
not news at all, but merely "official" confirmation of what has been
known for years. If one had launched a full-scale truth-finding expedition -
groping through the fallen rubble of AZT propaganda to find the kernel of truth
underneath it all - the Anglo-French Concorde study would not have seemed
revelatory at all.
Concorde went on for three years, examining
1,749 HIV-positive but healthy people at 38 health centers in the U.K., Ireland,
and France. Because the research lasted the longest of all AZT studies to fate,
and its pedigree was unassailable (it was conducted by the highly reputable
British Medical Research Council and its French equivalent), Concorde could not
be dismissed.
The team concluded that AZT - a highly toxic and
carcinogenic drug - neither prolongs life nor staves off symptoms of AIDS in
people who are HIV-antibody positive but still healthy. The blueprint
for the Concorde "disappointment" has been in the literature for many
years. As we reported in November 1989, the first objective study was completed
in France in 1988 and was published with very little fanfare in the Lancet, a
British medical journal.
The study found that AZT was too toxic for
most people to tolerate, had no lasting effect on HIV blood levels, and left the
patients with fewer CD4 cells than they had started with.
If Concorde
appeared surprising, it was because we in the U.S. have been captivated by
self-induced AZT mythology for so many years. It was our FDA that approved AZT
for use in 1987 based on very flimsy data and with a little arm-twisting, and it
was our National institutes of Health (NIH) that expanded the parameters for AZT
to be given to all healthy, HIV-positive people. In 1989, the NIH cited a study,
known as Protocol 019, that it said had "clearly shown" that early
administration of AZT would keep AIDS at bay in that population.
Dr.
Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID), recommended that anyone with HIV antibodies and less than 500
CD4 cells should start taking AZT at once. At that time, that meant 650,000
people in the U.S. I had heard that the Concorde team had been under tremendous
pressure from AZT's manufacturer. Burroughs Wellcome, to soften its
results.
AZT IS DEATH
AZT
ON TRIAL
By John
Lauritsen
New York Native 19 Oct. 1987
I argued in a previous article (Native #215) that the theory behind
AZT (now known by its trade name of Retrovir) was false, inasmuch as the
hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS has been refuted by Prof. Peter H. Duesberg, a
world-renowned molecular biologist at Berkeley; that AZT's alleged benefits were
not backed up by reliable evidence; that its toxicities were firmly established
and severe; and that therefore the drug should not be prescribed, recommended,
or used.
In his interview with me (Native #220), Prof.
Duesberg referred to AZT as "a poison" and as "cytotoxic"
(lethal to body cells). Duesberg said that the theories behind AZT were false,
that there was "no rationale for treating with AZT", that prescribing
AZT was "highly irresponsible", and that AZT was "guaranteed"
to be harmful: AZT hits all DNA that is made.
It is hell for the bone
marrow, which is where the T and B cells and all those things are made. It's
hell for that. It has a slight preference for viral DNA polymerase compared to
cellular DNA polymerase, and that's based on in vitro studies only, but
that's certainly not absolute.
It kills normal cells quite, quite
extensively. At the time these articles were published, the only reports on the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trial that was the basis for granting
government approval to market AZT, were in the popular media or a promotional
film produced by AZT's manufacturer, Burroughs-Wellcome. Doctors who prescribed
AZT did so on the basis on very limited information, along with the assurances
of the Public Health Service that AZT represented the "best hope".
AZT ON TRIAL
AZT
Chemical
Name: Azidothymidine
Generic Name: Zidovudine
Nick Name:
AZT
Brand Name: Retrovir ® (Retrovis ®)
Manufacturer:
Glaxo-Wellcome
The label on an AZT bottle from the Sigma Co.
The
AZT advisory on the label reads: "TOXIC. Toxic by inhalation, in contact
with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s): Blood bone marrow. If you feel
unwell, seek medical advice (show the label where possible). Wear suitable
protective clothing." Note the skull and bones on the label; the indication
for a deathly poison (bottle contains only 100 mg, healthy people are prescribed
500 to 1500 mg a day)
AZT INDEX
AZT
ROULETTE
The impossible choices
facing HIV-positive women.
By
Celia Farber
Mothering Sept./Oct.
1998
The story of Kris Chmiel
Kris Chmiel is a housewife and
mother of two young children, living in Denver. When she was pregnant with her
second child, a movement had just gotten under way to test all pregnant women in
the state of Colorado for HIV, the virus widely believed to cause AIDS. (Critics
remind us that what is tested for is not, in fact, HIV, but antibodies to HIV.)
She was perfectly healthy and in her first month of pregnancy. She wasn't
worried -- she had been monogamous with her husband for the past nine years.
When the test came back "positive," she literally did not
believe it. Her doctors strongly urged her to immediately start taking the AIDS
drug AZT, in an effort to prevent transmission to her child. "They finally
wore me down," she says, "even though it was totally against my
intuition." In her fifth month of pregnancy, Chmiel began taking 500
milligrams of AZT, a drug that has been routinely given to pregnant HIV-positive
women following a 1994 study -- ACTG 076 -- which claimed efficacy in reducing
the transmission from mother to child.
(1) (AZT stands for azidothymidine
and is marketed under the names Zidovudine or Retrovir.)
AZT ROULETTE
OPPOSED TO AIDS DRUGS, MOTHERS GO UNDERGROUND
Mainstream doctors say 'fringe' science is risking lives of
children By Mark Kennedy
The Ottawa Citizen 7 Sept. 1999
A growing number of HIV-positive mothers in Canada and the United
States are going into hiding as part of an "underground railroad" to
avoid having their children treated with anti-AIDS drugs. Some of the Canadian
women, concerned that child-protection agencies will take away their babies, are
fleeing to the U.S. to remain anonymous and stay beyond the reach of doctors.
The development is part of a recent trend that is infuriating the
country's leading AIDS doctors and researchers. A group of U.S.-based dissident
scientists has argued for years that HIV is not the cause of AIDS and there's no
point in taking the drug cocktails designed to prevent the virus from turning
into AIDS.
They argue the side effects of the drugs are so
severe that they pose a greater risk to the patient than HIV itself. Montreal
doctor Mark Wainberg, president of the International AIDS Society, dismisses the
dissidents as "fringe people" who are trying to "make themselves
out to be more important than they are." He wishes people would just
ignore them so their views aren't given credence.
"Let me give
you an example. There are people out there who deny that the Holocaust happened.
Do we want to give them equal credibility?" Nonetheless, it appears the
message is getting out, despite the best efforts of the medical community to
persuade people with HIV that the anti-viral drugs offer the best, if not the
only hope, of staying healthy.
MOTHERS GO UNDERGROUND
SINS OF OMISSION-The AZT Scandal
By Celia Farber
Spin Nov. 1989
On a cold January day in 1987, inside one of the brightly-lit meeting
rooms of the monstrous FDA building, a panel of 11 top AIDS doctors pondered a
very difficult decision. They had been asked by the FDA to consider giving
lightning-quick approval to a highly toxic drug about which there was very
little information. Clinically called Zidovudine, but nicknamed AZT after its
components, the drug was said to have shown a dramatic effect on the survival of
AIDS patients.
The study that had brought the panel together had set
the medical community abuzz. It was the first flicker of hope - people were
dying much faster on the placebo than on the drug. But there were tremendous
concerns about the new drug. It had actually been developed a quarter of a
century earlier as a cancer chemotherapy, but was shelved and forgotten because
it was so toxic, very expensive to produce, and totally ineffective against
cancer. Powerful, but unspecific, the drug was not selective in its cell
destruction.
Drug companies around the world were sifting
through hundreds of compounds in the race to find a cure, or at least a
treatment, for AIDS. Burroughs Wellcome, a subsidiary of Wellcome, a British
drug company, emerged as the winner. By chance, they sent the failed cancer
drug, then known as Compound S, to the National Cancer Institute along with many
others to see if it could slay the AIDS dragon, HIV. In the test tube at least,
it did.
At the meeting, there was a lot of uncertainty and
discomfort with AZT. The doctors who had been consulted knew that the study was
flawed and that the long-range effects were completely unknown. But the public
was almost literally baying at the door. Understandably, there was immense
pressure on the FDA to approve AZT even more quickly than they had approved
thalidomide in the mid-60s, which ended up causing drastic birth defects.
SINS
OF OMISSION-THE AZT SCANDAL
HIV
VOODOO FROM BURROUGHS-WELLCOME
By John Lauritsen
New York Native
7 Jan. 1991 [revised 16 Jan. 1991]
Those who have eyes to see
are witnessing genocide-the genocide of gay men.
Milli
Unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies, corrupt government
officials, venal physicians, stupid and cowardly media people, incompetent and
dishonest researchers-none of these things are new. They are business as usual.
Where, then, does the buck stop?
Who is responsible for
pharmacogenocide?
My thinking on this question was altered recently
when I read Confessions of a Medical Heretic by Robert Mendelsohn, who
uncompromisingly places the blame on the members of his own profession: Despite
the obvious corruption of the drug company/doctor marketing connection, I don't
blame the drug companies, the detail men, the government agencies which are
supposed to police these activities, or the patients who badger their doctors
for drugs.
Doctors have enough facts in their possession to know
what's going on. Even where the drug is fully tested and the side effects and
limitations of the drug are well known, most of the harm is done by doctors
indiscriminately prescribing the drug. Doctors, after all, are the ones who
claim the sacred power and the ethical superiority that goes with it.
The drug companies are in business to make money, and they do that by
selling as much of their product as they can at as high a price as they can.
And although the drug companies subvert the scientific process through which
drugs are tested, certified, and made available to doctors, once the drugs are
available, they do let doctors know-albeit subtly-just what these drugs can and
cannot do. All of us who know the truth about AZT will have to do what we can.
Friends who are on AZT must be told directly and forcefully that they must get
off the drug if they want to live. Public health officials, representatives of
AIDS organizations, and various and sundry other "AIDS experts" must
be confronted with their lies.
Above all, doctors must be told that
they have no right to prescribe a drug that can only lead to the deaths of their
patients. The buck stops with the AZT-pushing doctors.
They are responsible. *
HIV VOODOO FROM BURROUGHS-WELLCOME
POISON BY PRESCRIPTION-THE AZT STORY
By John
Lauritzen
This is the story of a toxic drug, with no scientifically
proven benefits, which is being given to thousands of people, including who are
perfectly healthy. It is a collusion among corrupt government officials,
incompetent researchers, and an unscrupulous pharmaceutical company.
POISON
BY DESCRiPTION-THE AZT STORY
The
AIDS Catch
In 1987 the Centre for Disease Control in
Atlanta USA, revised and broadened its definition of AIDS, listing 25 diseases.
So many different diseases points away from one single viral cause argues Peter
Duesberg.
DR. PETER DUESBERG: "AIDS is a collection or
syndrome of 25 old diseases, conventional diseases. Not one of them is new.
They've all been known for centuries, or at least for decades. With the
provision that you have to find antibody to HIV or you or virus or some
other traces of that virus, when they are found then those who believe in the
virus as the cause of AIDS, say, those 25 diseases, any one of them or
combination of them, are caused by the virus.
For example, if you
have tuberculosis and you find HIV, they say HIV has done it. Eighty years ago,
a hundred years ago Robert Koch used to say tuberculosis bacillus has done it."
THE AIDS CATCH (MEDITEL 1999)
AIDS AND AFRICA
Meditel 1993
At Old Mulago Hospital, Dr. Martin
Okot-Nwang is in charge of the TB wards. He is concerned about the way TB and
AIDS statistics are being wrongly reported. TB is a disease that occurs where
there is poverty, malnutrition and lack of medicines. Conditions all rife in
today's Uganda. Figures have doubled recently in these wards.
The
rise in TB cases in Africa has led some scientists to speculate that the HIV
virus is making some people more susceptible to the disease but it is hard to
find any evidence for this. What IS documented is that flaws in the clinical
case definition, that is the combination of symptoms used for diagnosing AIDS
without an HIV test, have meant that many TB cases have mistakenly been called
AIDS.
AIDS AN AFRICA
New US Government Guidelines & Home-Testing Kits
New government guidelines for tracking the AIDS virus are getting mixed reviews
from advocates, who say the old system was outdated but the new one raises
privacy concerns. The guidelines, published Thursday by the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, asks states to report all HIV cases
rather than just cases of full-blown AIDS.
Testing sites would report
HIV cases and patient names or identifying codes to state health departments,
which would pass case data on to the CDC. Names and other identifying
information would be kept at the state level. States that don't comply with
the guidelines risk losing federal funding for HIV surveillance ranging from
$50,000 for Wyoming to $3 million for New York City.
The
guidelines will mainly affect people who request an HIV test during visits to
their regular doctor or when having lab work done that goes on their medical
record. Most states have clinics that offer anonymous HIV tests, and
home-testing kits can be bought over-the-counter at many drug stores.
New US Government
Guidelines
Censoring the
other news about Aids
AIDS
CENSORSHIP
Regular
updates from AIDS Frontnews
Peter Duesberg
Homepage
And more
links
http://buildfreedom.com/aidsdir.htm
http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl09a.shtml
http://www.mmsweb.com/eykiw/aids/aids.htm
http://aids-info.net/
http://www.geniusideas.com/aidsgate/
http://www.webleyweb.com/tle/le951101.html
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6443/aids.html
http://www.artnet.net/~acharya/truth/aids.htm
http://pages.prodigy.net/johnhunter2/hivaids.htm
http://www.zolatimes.com/v2.30/aidsexis.html
m
Visit our
"A Call to Awaken" page for more information on vaccinations,
fluoride, medical research, etc.
Light
Network Homepage
E-mail Light Network
