Giordano Challenges U.S. Charges
Federal Jurisdiction Questioned

Giordano Challenges U.S. Charges
Federal Jurisdiction Questioned
December 8, 2001
By MARK PAZNIOKAS, Courant Staff Writer

Well-established case law says that the federal government has no jurisdiction to prosecute jailed Waterbury Mayor Philip A. Giordano on child sex charges, according to a defense motion to dismiss the case.**(see note)

The motion filed Thursday attacks the legal underpinnings of the federal charges against Giordano, who is accused in a 14-count indictment of sexually assaulting two girls under age 12.

Sexual assault is not a federal crime under most circumstances, so federal authorities charged Giordano with depriving the girls of their civil rights and using an interstate facility - a telephone - to solicit the girls for sex.

Andrew B. Bowman, Giordano's lawyer, argues that the indictment alleges that Giordano made calls only within Connecticut to arrange sex with the girls, so the interstate telephone counts should be thrown out.

As for the civil rights charges, Bowman says, "the alleged minor victims do not have a federally protected right to be free from `aggravated sexual abuse and sexual abuse,"' as claimed in the indictment.

The government has until next month to respond.

If Senior U.S. District Judge Alan H. Nevas agrees with the defense, Giordano still faces a long road of legal troubles - sexual assault charges pending in state court, and the possibility of a new federal indictment on corruption charges.

FBI agents interrupted an investigation of possible corruption to arrest Giordano on the child sex charges in July. Wiretaps obtained to investigate corruption allegedly uncovered evidence of sexual assaults.

The challenge to the federal case "will not affect our case against Giordano," Waterbury State's Attorney John A. Connelly said. "Our charges are based on state law."

Giordano, 38, a three-term mayor and last year's Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, has been jailed without bail since his arrest July 26. A federal indictment charges him with two civil rights counts, one count of conspiracy and 11 counts of using a phone to entice or solicit the children for sex.

The indictment accuses Giordano of acting under "color of law" - abusing his powers as mayor - to deprive the children of their civil rights, a crime punishable by a maximum of life in prison.

It represents a novel use of a civil rights law more typically employed against police officers accused of brutality.

But Bowman says it is not enough that Giordano is mayor to accuse him of abusing the girls under color of law.

"In order to act under color of law, the actor's actions must be `committed in the performance of an actual or pretended' duty," Bowman wrote.


Wasn't it Federal Attorney General Janet Reno who declared that the massacre of children at Mount Carmel near Waco, Texas, was Federal Jurisdiction to end child abuse there?

Mind Control Out of Control
by Cathy O'Brien & Mark Phillips

Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.

Back to the Americas Menu
Back to News Archive Menu

FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.