E-mail received today:
I am a little confused about the plane crash in Washington D.C. I spoke to [a contact] who was in Alexandria [Virginia close to Washington DC] on Tuesday and heard the crash into the Pentagon.
In Washington D.C. they have, according to [the contact], the A.D.I.Z. the American Defense Identification Zone in which the Controller makes contact with incoming planes. Also known as I.F.F. Identification Friend or Foe. There was an hour warning that the plane had been highjacked. President Bush's plane had warning of the highjacking and took precautions, yet no IMMEDIATE defense was given to Washington D.C. when American Flight # 77 crashed into the Pentagon.
The Central Intelligence Agency warned the FBI that one of the highjackers of American Flight # 77 should not have been in the United States. His Visa had expired! The Intelligence breakdown is blamed "across the board!" [Writter] David Hagberg had authored [a] scenario [similar to that] of September 11th in his book High Flight.
[My contact, an expert in these matters] told me when an incoming Foe plane is a threat they send fighter planes out to identify them or shoot them down if they are a threat. "On average," radar coverage should extend to 400 miles in radius a total of 800 miles in diameter. It is an expression called Scrambling! He pointed out that they had fighter planes within a mile or two at TWO airports Andrews AFB and Bolling AFB, the Pentagon is right across the river. The Pentagon began being built in September of 1941 and is the largest building in the world, six million square feet. Directly west of Bolling AFB. President Bush landed at Andrews Air force Base yesterday and caught the helicopter from there as an example.
My contact did not hear any fighter planes until 1:00 pm and pointed out that instead of scrambling up fighter planes from Andrews or Bolling they sent them out from Langley AFB...about a 150 miles away. They left Langley 15 minutes before the plane hit the Pentagon and arrived two minutes after the plane hit the Pentagon.
Alexandria is around 7 miles from Washington D.C. When you observe all of the phone calls on cell phones from the passengers, they should have had better protection. The plane hit the Pentagon at 9:40 am.
On another note, someone I know spoke to a retired CIA agent, who told them that the plane outside of Pittsburgh was "shot down." I would point out that the many witnesses said the plane was not shot down but crashed. Had they shot down this plane there would have been smoke and flames.
An interesting theory and set of facts are as follows: Mohammed Al Fayed was suing the Pentagon for having 1100 documents pertaining to the death of his son and Princess Diana. Mohammed Al Fayed's brother-in-law was Adnan Khasggoi, once the richest man in the world who worked with George H.W. Bush during the Iran-Contra scandal.
Adnan Khasggoi was a frequent visitor to Edwin Pauley's island in Hawaii, Coconut Island. Pauley ran an oil company in 1960 which was a CIA front with George H.W. Bush for the CIA's Bay of Pigs invasion, Operation Zapata.
Mohammed Al Fayed has the power of attorney to the Sultan of Brunei, one of the richest men in the world. All of these men, including George H.W. Bush had contacts to many sources in the Arab world. In 1953 both Bush Sr. and Fayed were working with Singer Sewing Machine company and both were in business with George de Mohrenschildt, Fayed in 1964, Bush in the 1950s. [DeMorenschildt was the closest friend of Lee Harvey Oswald - see posting about the Bush connection to the Kennedy assassination].
Both Fayed and Bush have ties to the Central Intelligence Agency and to British Intelligence. Bush Sr. had worked with Hussein [sic] and Bin Laden who were trained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.