CHENEY
a clear and present danger
to world peace

Cheney must confront Burma's inhumane policies

As Halliburton chief, he led a company that did business in the repressive Asian nation

Saturday, January 20, 2001

IN MY OPINION
Robert B. Textor

Dick Cheney, the new vice president and former defense secretary, will be one of the key foreign policy advisers to George W. Bush, who assumes office today with virtually no foreign policy background.

Will the advice Cheney gives to Bush be good advice? Ethical advice? Or will Cheney advance an agenda that allows American corporations to make handsome profits overseas in countries whose dictatorships force their citizens into unpaid labor?

The answer is predictable. Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton Inc., has already enriched himself in just this fashion. After just five years of service with Halliburton, Cheney received a multimillion-dollar separation allowance -- part of which will be traceable to Halliburton's very profitable oil equipment operations in Burma.

According to data supplied by the ruling military junta of what's also called Myanmar, on any given day that regime forces some 800,000 citizens to do unpaid labor. This regime has been repeatedly condemned by the U.N. General Assembly, the International Labor Organization, the European Community, the AFL-CIO, Amnesty International and the U.S. government itself.

We Americans settled the issue of whether it is legally and ethically acceptable for businesses to profit from forced unpaid labor here at home 135 years ago, at the cost of 620,000 American lives. What remains unsettled to this day, however, is whether it is ethical for American companies to take advantage of forced unpaid labor overseas.

Cheney has said yes. I believe this makes him a clear and present danger to world peace.

The Wall Street Journal last year carefully documented the devious involvement of Halliburton and Cheney in Burma. "Halliburton's Burma connection is a potentially embarrassing episode for Mr. Cheney," the paper said. "Since 1988, when the Burmese army killed thousands of pro-democracy protesters to stay in power, the country's military junta has been widely condemned as one of the world's most brutal violators of human rights. The United States, which withdrew its ambassador and suspended aid to Burma a decade ago, banned new U.S. investment in the country in 1997 and has led international efforts to isolate the regime."

The article then refers to the notorious Yadana pipeline: "The Western companies that in partnership with the country's military rulers sponsored the pipeline and hired contractors like the Halliburton venture already knew the project was benefiting from forced Burmese labor and 'numerous acts of violence' by Burmese military, according to recent findings by a U.S. federal judge in Los Angeles."

Halliburton's involvement in Burma is clearly contrary to the spirit of existing U.S. policy. An executive order issued by President Bill Clinton in 1997 banned all new investment in Burma. Because Halliburton began its investment in Burma before that date, it enjoys exemption from this order. Otherwise, Halliburton's investment there would be illegal.

Numerous U.S. corporations have already pulled out of Burma, including some that didn't wait for the executive order: Texaco, Motorola, Hewlett-Packard, PepsiCo and Portland's own Columbia Sportswear.

More recently, even conservative Republican senators like Jesse Helms and Mitch McConnell, noting the steadily deteriorating civil rights situation in Burma, have been pressing for a policy that would go beyond banning investment and ban all imports of any kind from Burma.

I call upon our new vice president to:

1 Publicly acknowledge his ethical error;

2 Contribute that portion of his separation allowance attributable to Halliburton's activities in Burma to an organization such as the International Red Cross;

3 Urge his company to withdraw completely from Burma; ando Support, rather than obstruct, the spirit of the existing bipartisan U.S. policy of promoting democracy and human rights in Burma.

Absent some such form of redemption, in my opinion Cheney will never qualify ethically to be our vice president.

Robert B. Textor of Portland, a retired anthropology professor at Stanford University, is a Southeast Asia specialist.

http://www.oregonlive.com//

    

    


What Americans
Should Know
About the Mid East & Oil
James MacDonald Day

Related Articles:

ALICE IN WONDERLAND AND THE WTC DISASTER by David Icke

USA - U.S. Army's Undeclared War on Patriots Worldwide

Urban Warfare - Planned


Related Research Resources:

The Conspirators

America's Secret Establishment ~ Antony Sutton

Philip Dru Administrator - Col. Edward Mandell House

Conspirator's Heirarchy - Committee of 300

World Orders Old and New - Noam Chomsky

Children of the Matrix

The Robots' Rebellion

Lifting the Veil




Back to the Americas Menu
Back to News Archive Menu




Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.


FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.