The contention that the destruction of the WTC was used to destroy evidence contained on the 23rd and 24th floors of the North Tower is now incontrovertable.
This is the first revelation of the evidence that makes this conclusion a certainty. As yet no one has contacted any authorities with this information.
Here is evidence supplied by the Head of Security of the World Trade Center on network television indicating that the floors used by the FBI (22nd, 23rd and 24th floors) of the North Tower -- 70 floors below the crash-bombing impact -- had been devastated and reduced to debris. This same Head of Security himself dug through the debris to save persons who were trapped there.
It was on these floors that the evidence and investigation briefs on two highly important cases were being stored:
1) The case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan (at that time before a New York grand jury as described in great detail by Seymour Hersh in the July 9 New Yorker magazine);
2) The evidence in the investigation of Gold Price Fixing which stemmed from charges brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company and Goldman Sachs. (See below for full reconstruction of this crime -- that is now all but confirmed by this revelation of a bomb devestating the FBI floors of the North Tower before the tower collapsed.)
At noon I received a phone call from New England from Steve. He was reviewing recorded footage of coverage of the destruction of the WTC on NBC's program "48 Hours." Steve has reviewed the footage many times and taken detailed notes.
I took notes at my computer as he spoke. After the south tower collapsed, men went up to the 22nd floor of the WTC and "dug" someone out of the "rubble" he found there.
It is known that these floors contained the New York FBI offices. Peter Jennings actually did a two-day network news story on the effects of the destroyed evidence and files on American financial crime investigations around the world.
The 48 Hours anchor was interviewing the Head of Security of the WTC about the evacuation. He had received a call, after the South Tower was down from the Port Authority's Command Center on the 22nd floor asking for rescue.
The Head of Security himself travelled to that floor in the company of a NY Fireman where they found the offices devastated to the point that they had to "tunnel through debris" to "dig out" the two or three Port Authority workers who were trapped there.
All of this happened 73 floors below crashbombing impact.
The man who called me about this (Steve from Maine) said that he had received a copy detailing the evidence for a terror frame-up from one of the hundreds of people he pesters with my posts each day and that he had been reviewing three lists of occupants of the WTC.
He gave the sites for two different listings of WTC tower occupants, which I copied as follows:
Tenants by floor and square footage - www.cnn.com/special/2001/trade.center/tenants1.html
Occupation by tenancy - www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/article/tower1.html
He noticed from these that listings were given for all floors EXCEPT floors 23 and 24, immediately above the location of the call for "digging out" rescue -- indicating that the debris had fallen down from a destructive event occuring on the floor directly above.
Steve left off with this statement (which I am not able now to confirm or disconfirm): "The Murrah Building in Oaklahoma City was where all of the records of the Waco Seige were being kept. I think this is their MO (modus operandi)."
Their modus operandi is their distinctive pattern of crime.
Here is the post that prompted Steve's phone call:
Below I present what I think are incontrovertable reasons for concluding that the WTC/Pentagon crashbombings were a frame-up designed to benefit members of at least these four groups:
1) People profiting from the opium trade of the Northern Alliance druglords and the money-laundering through global investment channels that the opium trade and the derivative heroin trade supports;
2) People seeking control of the $6 trillion worth of oil and natural gas in Central Asia;
3) People seeking to win back support to increasingly unpopular Sharonist policies in Israel; and
4) People arraigned before a grand jury on charges of fixing gold prices, illegal involvement in oil swaps between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran, and bribery in cases where all incriminating documentary evidence was stored in FBI files and data banks in one of the twin towers of the WTC.
All four of these groups have fluid secret channels of communication through networked integration of banking, politics, the CIA and Mossad connections. The fact is that if one of these groups was complicit the other three would also have to be.
Here are three independently developed arguments:
1. Best guess origins of the WTC/Pentagon crashbombing frame-up.
Mossad and the CIA were supporting traffick in Afgan-opium-derived heroin -- devoting public resources to protect and assist the suppliers and distributors of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered drug revenue deposits backing the global investments of American and Britsih elite finance.
The Afgan Northern Alliance druglords grow 70 to 90 percent of the worlds opium, the prime ingredient of heroin. The opium which is moved across the small China-Afgan boarder for processing and distribution by the giant People's Liberation Army (that amazing transnational corporation) Triad drug cartel-and military super military establishment all in one.
Against the tremendous stake interests, this giant outlaw network, the morally conservative Taliban had been erradicating Afghan opium production, supressing supply to druglords and the drug-revenue flow money-laundering establishment bankers and global investors alike.
Thus "crisis" became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA and/or Mossad in seeking ways to defeat Afghanistan's Talibanist government. (Nothing absurd so far, right?)
Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have criminal ties to U.S. executive James Giffen in Kazakhstan -- a man under investigation by a New York grand jury in the months before September 11 for illegal involvement in an oil swaps between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran (Source: the Aug. 9 New Yorker Magazine for a full account of this by Seymour Hersh).
All of the evidence for this crime was being kept at the WTC on the 20th through 25th floor of one of the twin towers where the FBI had its New York Offices.
James Giffen is the key man everyone has to go through to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan -- including any pipelines built that would traverse Afganistan.
(There is $6 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.)
Giffen certainly understood -- if he did not originate the idea -- that if he could get operatives (even "captured" vengeful Islamic activists whose rage could be shaped and directed to use of terror) to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC building and the documentation- evidence it contained, then he would be escape grand jury indictment.
As an powerful added benefit, the (framed) Taliban would get replaced with a regime in Afganistan that would permit a pipeline to be built -- preferably a Northern Alliance druglord government that would harmonize with Giffen's own unethical (murderous) entrepreneural style. (See the New Yorker artlical for details of Giffen's history.)
So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people--Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen - renegade CIA or a Giffen "dark-side" Mossad link. But other, even more powerful players may have had involvement -- certainly they stood to gain tremendously if the crashbomb frame-up were successfully accomplished.
Prior to September 11 charges had been brought against Alan Greenspan -- at any rate, Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan & Co. and other powerful American financial figures and institutions had charges brought against them -- reportedly a very well-documented case -- over the fixing of gold prices -- with evidence for that case too stored by the FBI on the FBI floors of the WTC!
These parties would not only profit heavily from the "carrot" of both oil and drug monies circulating through thier great financial institutions, but they also would gain from avoding the "stick" of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the U.S. financial establishment.
Realize what a guilty verdict in this case would mean to these leading financial families and to the Establishment in general.
These parties would welcome predictable and certainly substantial benefits from the the destruction of the evidence in the WTC and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.
Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives who characteristically operate in secret and under the protection of wealth, status and power -- both the carrot ($2 trillion in annual drug revenues funneled through the banking system which has funded much of the proceeds to fund the development of the Princeling-Triad dictatorship in China.
By the way, the communist government has been in the opium business since the 1930s. Mao pioneered the model, later followed by Peru's Shining Path and Colombia's Maoist F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists. Zhou Enlai devised the plan in the 1950s of weakening American society through a drug invasion.
"China white" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army, made from Afghan opium, links all banker and oilman to the corrupt renegade secret-state agencies, CIA, FBI, and Mossad. Renegade agents of either agency may have seen this opportunity for mutual gain and found the way -- having profiles of each of the players -- to propose the crash-bombing frame-up as the best "solution" to each of players' most troublesome problems, while making enormous profits besides.
Note that the Bushes are tied to both the CIA and oil and, through Mena, Arkansas, to drug smuggling and through the Iran-Contra, to drugs and arms deals, etc.
Drugworld investigator Daniel Hopsicker, as well as Noam Chomsky and many others have exposed this thoroughly -- at least in the broad strokes necessary to support this reconstruction of the crime.
The facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from the Russians, to the John Birchers, to Wired Magazine, Harpers, New Yorker, the Village Voice, the Nation, and Rolling Stone Magazine, all having explored the drug - Establishment connections in great detail.
And that brings us to Ariel Sharon. His hard-headed policy of retaliation regardless of 'collateral damage' and his provocation at the mosque cost him dearly in world opinion.
In fact, the Bush administration was very close to initiating a major policy shift (obviously known to Sharon from the greatest intelligence organization in the world). Bush was planning the recognition/sponsorship of a separate Palestinian state.
Also war crime charges had been brought against Sharon in international court, further putting his hard-line policy against the Palestinians in an unfavorable light.
Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely possible that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that thought of the crash-bombing frame-up plan in the first place decided to take the risk of telling Sharon about the plan, offering it as a solution to the trapped old "freedom fighter's" problems as well.
If the U.S. could be made to think that the hated Osama bin Laden and that Islamic fundamentalism itself is responsible for destroying the twin towers of the WTC, then, Sharon would certainly grasp that American opinion would radically swing to an extremely hard line against all Moslem and Arab entities not securely under their thumb, and most particularly, from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.
No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not close on such a deal, such a serving of his higher good, his prime directive.
And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation. Getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair.
Mossad has infiltrated bin Ladin's forces in Central Asia and the Mideast -- but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must be to remain viable) and so it was an easy matter for this "dark-side" Mossad, with Sharon's clandestine approval, to trick some very angry and vengeful Arabs into thinking they were doing bin Ladens or some other anti-Zionist or anti-Globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four planes.
Millions in the world hated America and the globalization that the World Trade Center represents.
These recruited hijackers need not have been Arabs -- there are Croats, Serbs, Latin Americans, and Iranians and any number of other victim-pool people who could have volunteered to conduct the hijacking -- possibly without fully understanding the end result of the mission. They need not have "signed on" for a suicide bombing.
Many aviation experts on the net are describing a system built into commercial airliners for taking over control of flight from the ground, a system developed to combat terrorism.
It is possible that the course of the plane's flight was taken over by this system installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in several reports on the web.) But if the crashes were not effected in this way, then psychological-control methods, wholly sufficient for the job, were also available.
The technology of behavior control is further advanced than the popular press has made people aware.
Skilled psy-ops agents can get subjects angry enough and convinced enough of the justice and good effects of "acts' represented as serving their 'cause" to be willing to undertake even suicidal missions.
And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act. But then what?
When the crashes take place, word merely has to be put out by those involved, the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and those complicit in the Bush Administration, (based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz) to push the theme that bin Ladin was responsible and that this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only immediate appropriate reaction.
Since, as the spin goes, the Afghans are responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and that "harboring is exactly the same as terrorism" and that for that reason the entire Afghan government must be terminated and must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's revealing phrasing of September 12.
The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the perpetrators.
Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting that bin Ladin's guilt has been established beyond doubt -- that for the sake of the security and safety of Israel and the United States that it is necessary that the impression of an "open and shut case" must be spun.
The news media is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime correspondents" and sets about selling the blaming of bin Ladin and advocating war and overthrow in Afghanistan -- because they have been deceitfully led to believe they really know who bombed the buildings; and among the elite of the news publishers, they "know" it is in the best interests of Israel and Wall Street that this be the response, that this be the spin.
And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.
And trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and supress criticism of the investigation -- after all, who would know better than the CIA and Mossad, who is responsible?
The fact has been reported -- in a different context, of course -- that the U.S. intelligence receives all of its ground intelligence from Central Asia through Mossad's network of infiltrator spies -- in other words, whatever "proofs" the U.S. has (and has shown Tony Blair and NATO) has come exclusively through Sharon via Mossad.
The "evidence" so-called, thus, is no counterweight to this reconstruction of the crime.
The "evidence" comes exclusively from the prime "frame-up" suspect.
Has Mossad done this kind of thing before?
Remember the USS Liberty, an American ship with flag flying, deliberatly attacked and sunk (in multiple attack waves) with efforts to kill every saior abord -- either to destroy information that the ship may have intercepted or to frame Arab states to gain the support of American public opinion.
There are other cases involving the blowing up of a disco dance nightclub, again to frame targeted enemies -- a case actually brought to light by the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.
The coverup apparently has unlimited resources. Two Mossad men caught red handed days after the WTC crash-bombings, were carrying explosive charges and detonation controls in the government chambers of the Mexican legislature. Apparently big bribes have been paid because these men have been set free.
One surmises that appeals are made to the bogey man of a "destabalizing international crisis" if the truth were to get out.
This is the ancient cloak of deviant ruling elites.
How many readers -- even if they strongly suspect that this reconstruction fits the facts -- would not deny the conclusion anyway because of fear of what this fact would do to Israel's reputation and thus to her security and survival?
Yet this view may be wrong.
If Israeli's on the "good side" were to arrest Sharon and chase down the renegades of the Mossad "dark side" and bring them to justice -- tensions in the Mideast would dissolve, and good-faith restored -- good faith that will never return to the world as long as the greatest terror frame-up in history is not corrected by justice and the truth.
Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly raises the likelihood that Ariel Sharon was also the man who gave the order for the murder of Yhitzak Rabin, Israel's greatest peacemaker (if that title does not go to Began for his treaty with Sadat.)
Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering "take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at last be discredited and that the humanitarian way of Rabin could again be given another chance -- with the Palestinians gaining restored faith in Israel to be fair and just after seeing Sharon removed and brought to justice.
I know that at this point you are poised to throw the usual tomatoes and call me a "loon" and a "nazi" -- but I know that those who call me those names are themselves fearful that this analysis may be right.. and I forgive you in advance for having to through those tomatoes out of loyalty and not knowing what else to do in your uncertainty.
It is a rotten world all around -- but my advice is to seek the truth wherever it leads and then to enforce justice -- justice against the real authors of the Sept 11 terror, whoever they may be -- to go after Sharon just as strenuously as you were recently ready to hunt down bin Laden.
And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning of its topmost shelves of power and influence -- a job that we have been putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will benefit from that job!)
And I should make this clearer: The media are not silent because they are complicit in the terror -- they are silent because they are "yes men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they are not about to jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see others in their postions doing so.
This is consitent with today's "Dilbert" world of Establishment-monopolized organizations. Only an earth shaking event, like the exposing of the Establishment's role in the WTC terror, will shake down this system.
Now, let's discuss this intelligently.
The Temple of Karnak
ALICE IN WONDERLAND AND THE WTC DISASTER by David Icke
USA - U.S. Army's Undeclared War on Patriots Worldwide
Urban Warfare - Planned
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.