Cowboy Dubya Attacks American Indians

Bush administration rescinds Indian land rule

WASHINGTON (November 9, 2001 1:06 p.m. EST) - The Bush administration has rescinded a Clinton-era rule that would have made it easier for tribes to restore lost land to reservations.

Neal McCaleb, assistant interior secretary for Indian affairs, said parts of the rule were unclear, and the rule lacked processing standards. Because it was impractical to rescind only part of the rule, he said, the new administration will build a new rule from scratch.

The rule was opposed by municipalities and state attorneys general and governors who complained that, because the tribes wouldn't have to pay taxes on the land, it could erode their tax base. There also were concerns that the tribes could build casinos or low-income housing on the land.

"All along we have recognized that a balance must be struck between the needs of the tribes to acquire land ... and the concerns of those governments, communities and individuals who are affected by land-into-trust requests," McCaleb said.

A notice of the rule's withdrawal was published Friday in the Federal Register.

Actions by the federal government in the late 19th and early 20th century removed about two-thirds of tribal land from their reservations. Now, through economic development - much of it driven by casinos - the tribes are seeking to buy back that land and restore the original reservation.

The Clinton administration established a rule that would have set deadlines and streamlined the process for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to rule on a tribe's application to restore land to a reservation - a process that can now take years.

Ron Allen, vice president of the National Congress of American Indians, said the demise of the rule was disappointing.

"The biggest issue that is emerging from the folks that are fighting the process is quite frankly they are afraid of Indians," he said. "They're afraid of Indian power, they don't trust tribes and they don't trust tribal government, and it really has racist overtones."

When the Bush administration took office, it postponed implementation of hundreds of Clinton-era decisions and rules, including the Indian land rule, for further review.

source:
http://www.nandotimes.com/nation/story/167209p-1602814c.html

Related Research Resources:

    

    








Related Articles:

ALICE IN WONDERLAND AND THE WTC DISASTER by David Icke

USA - U.S. Army's Undeclared War on Patriots Worldwide

Urban Warfare - Planned




Back to the Americas Menu
Back to News Archive Menu




Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.


FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.