Sharon's 'Dear personal friend' buys the Democrat's Brookings Instutution...
Now he, Haim Saban, didn't quite literally buy it all. He just kicked in some super-big bucks and got himself a new Institute dealing with the Middle East in Washington with both his own name and that of Brookings on the door.
And then to head it up, he installed the guy the Israelis had brought over to the U.S. in the 1980s to lead their then new Near East Institute think-tank - the same guy whose citizenship was rushed through when Bill Clinton got elected so he could become a top Middle East official working on behalf of the Israelis from inside the U.S. government.
Yes we know, to those not in the know about such Washington affairs things like this sometimes sound more like fiction than reality. But we assure you...this is all very much part of the factual realities behind-the-scenes in Washington these days, no matter how much it is socially and politically incorrect to spill the beans so openly.
This little feature story from the New York Times Magazine a few months ago is full of interesting facts about Haim Saban -- but lacks both the crucial Washington context and the overall Israeli conspiracy aspects. Yes, we used the word 'conspiracy' on purpose. For the Israelis and the many organizations that make up the extended Israeli-Jewish lobby headquartered in Washington very purposefully use a few crucial think-tanks and institutes to constantly manipulate and control the media. And in doing so they also considerably influence policies while at the same time positioning those in their pay for key government positions no matter whether it's Democrats or Republicans in charge.
In the case of Haim Saban, Martin Indyk, and Brookings this little deal was done shortly after Bush defeated Gore four years ago now. Walla - The Saban Institute at The Brookings Institution headed by Indyk and of course fronting for the Israelis no matter how much they pretend otherwise.
Back in 1983, after the bad press from the invasion of Lebanon, Israel's American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC, spun off a think-tank since known as the Near East Institute. It was to head up this Institute that Indyk was first brought to the U.S., an Australian citizen with extensive Israeli intelligence connections.
During the Clinton years it was Martin Indyk and the infamous Dennis Ross, also formerly connected with AIPAC, who ran the 'Peace Process'. Cut to the chase...Clinton had had to pay off his big campaign debt to crucial Jewish advisers and money-men but putting these operatives in charge in both the National Security Council and the State Department.
With Gore's unexpected defeat in 2000 Ross went back to head up AIPAC's Near East Institute as well as a new division in Israel's Jewish Agency working to push Jews worldwide to emigrate to the Jewish State. That's when Saban stepped in, and Brookings sold out, with Indyk put in charge of this largely Democratic Party think-tank's Middle East affairs.
Now had John Kerry won the Presidency earlier this month he was heavily mortaged and deeply indebted to Haim Saban, one of the very top multi-million dollar campaign contributors and Democratic Party moneymen, as well as a close circle of Israeli-lobby connected Jewish Zionist advisers and financiers. Had that been the case both Indyk and Ross were already prepared to go back into key U.S. government policy-making positions.
Now read the details about Haim Saban keeping all this crucial perspective and context in mind which the nation's 'newspaper of record' largely ommitted.
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.