

By Andrew Woodcock, PA News
HOME Secretary David Blunkett gave a clear indication Sunday
that he is
considering the introduction of compulsory identity cards in the
UK.
And he suggested that the Human Rights Act introduced under the
first Blair
administration may have to be amended in order to permit the
introduction of
tough new anti-terror legislation in the wake of the atrocities
in the US.
He was speaking as polls suggested a high level of support for
identity cards
among British people, with as many as 85% backing their
introduction.
In an interview with BBC1's On the Record, Mr Blunkett stressed
the need to
balance the fight against terrorism with the freedoms of a
liberal society.
But he said that his "instincts" were that beating terror must
take priority
and that politicians' ability to act must not be hamstrung by an
excessively
legalistic approach to human rights.
Mr Blunkett said that he was giving "a fairly high priority" to
the question
of identity cards, but would not allow himself to be rushed into
a decision
in the wake of the attacks on New York and Washington.
He told On the Record: "It would not be right for me to make a
snap
announcement when we haven't had the chance to properly think
through the
implications, and to do so on the back of the attack on the
World Trade
Centre."
Any identity card system would not merely have a security
purpose, but would
offer a means of ensuring citizens' access to their
entitlements, he said.
Cards could incorporate high-tech features such as finger-print
or iris
recognition to make them impossible to forge, he said.
Mr Blunkett dismissed the idea of voluntary cards, floated
before the
September 11 outrages, as "not a great deal of help" in the
fight against
terrorism.
The provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights -
incorporated into
British law by the Human Rights Act - had proved "difficult to
deal with in
the current circumstances" created by the US attacks, said Mr
Blunkett.
He said: "There will be a balance to be struck. There will be
tensions
between the European Convention on Human Rights and the
necessary protection
that we seek.
"I hope that in getting this balance right, we can accept one
fundamental
tenet of our system - that it is elected representatives who can
be removed
and are accountable in a democratic, open and transparent
Parliament who
should be the prime protectors of our rights, rather than having
to rely on
the judicial system which, by its very nature, may protect us
against
authoritarianism but isn't accountable.
"I think we will have to find an accommodation which allows us
to ensure that
we take the kind of actions which prevent the terrorists
undermining and
doing away with the most basic freedoms of all - the freedom
from insecurity
and fear and from the taking of life.
"My instincts are to ensure that we take whatever action is
necessary to
engage with terrorism abusing our democracy in order to destroy
it.
"My instincts are to ensure that the law is proportionate to the
threat."
Mr Blunkett dismissed suggestions that Parliament might be
recalled over the
next few weeks in order to rush through anti-terrorist
legislation.
New bills may well be introduced, but the process of drafting
them in an
effective way would inevitably be lengthy and would prohibit any
hasty
action, he said.
Police and security services were already closely watching
members and
supporters of 21 organisations - mostly linked to Islamic
extremism -
proscribed last year by his predecessor Jack Straw, said Mr
Blunkett.
He said: "These organisations and those who belong to them are
being
monitored and action will, I promise everyone, be taken the
moment any of
these individuals steps over the line."
Three people arrested on Friday in Berkshire and Birmingham were
being
questioned by police "on suspicion of whether their actions and
their
contacts and the way in which they have behaved was involved
with or
contributed to the terrorist acts," said Mr Blunkett.
A poll in the News of the World today indicated that some 85% of
British
adults supported the introduction of identity cards, while a
survey for The
Observer recorded 71% backing for the move.

Back to the European Continent Menu
Back to News Archive Menu
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.