

North America urged to integrate
immigration, customs and security
Ottawa Citizen Online 18/06/00
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/national/000617/4294973.html
Jim Bronskill and Mike Blanchfield
WASHINGTON -- An American think-tank is
calling on
Canada, the
United States and Mexico to combine
customs,
immigration and security
functions to the point at which borders
become almost
irrelevant.
A study released yesterday by the Carnegie
Endowment
for International
Peace urges the three countries to explore
whether a
North American
"integration project" is worth pursuing
and to develop
a strategic plan for
rethinking border relationships.
A decision to proceed would trigger
bilateral
negotiations with the aim of
agreeing on the border relationship each
pair of
neighbouring countries
wishes to see in 10 or 15 years.
"For the U.S.-Canada border, this means
ever closer
and organic
co-operation, an ever more explicit focus
on
understanding and addressing
differences and ever greater
experimentation," says
the study, prepared by
the endowment's International Migration
Policy
Program.
"It is in fact our contention that,
substantively at
least, the U.S.-Canada
border is likely to disappear before any
politician
finds the political courage
to negotiate its removal."
The study's authors, Demetrios
Papademetriou and
Deborah Waller
Meyers, spent two years researching the
issues, paying
special attention to
life in border communities.
The study acknowledges the sensitivities
around
fostering closer ties between
sovereign countries and insists the
proposals would
not lead to the creation
of a new political entity, nor a
continental capital
akin to Brussels in the
European Community.
It also stresses that stronger border
co-operation
would not unduly affect
areas the partners consider "nearly
sacred" -- such as
issues of identity and,
in Canada's case, a tradition of
government-sponsored
social programs.
Canadian and U.S. leaders see more
effective border
management as a
pressing issue, insisted Martha Nixon, a
senior
Immigration Department
official who attended a Washington
conference
yesterday to discuss the
report's findings.
"They have asked us to make this a much
more
strategically focused piece of
business, so I think it's clear this is a
priority."
The authors say continental integration is
based on a
vision that imagines the
NAFTA borders gradually "becoming
irrelevant to the
point where their
abolition could proceed without any real
compromise"
in any of the priorities
of each partner.
Meyers said the rapid growth in commerce
between the
countries demands
a forward-looking approach to ensure
border systems
can handle the flow of
goods and people.
"Maybe things aren't collapsing yet, but
they will if
we don't do anything," she
said in an interview.
Among the authors' ideas:
-One partner conduct all inspections and
tariff
collections on behalf of the
other two countries when cargo enters
NAFTA space,
eliminating the need
to repeat procedures at each border. A
similar system
could be implemented
by immigration services to deal with
people crossing
borders.
-Canada and the United States, initially,
agree to a
common visa regime for
the widest band of countries possible.
-Canada and the United States gradually
liberalize the
movement of each
other's citizens, building on the
treatment each now
offers one another's
professionals under the NAFTA agreement.
The authors believe the proposals could
enhance
protection against illegal
activities such as terrorism and
drug-smuggling,
improve economic
prosperity and insulate each country from
"political
ups and downs" that
affect vital interests. For instance, some
U.S.
politicians have been pushing
for stricter border controls that would,
in turn, hurt
businesses.
The study says U.S. interest in the
integration
project is "likely to be tepid"
unless the proposals can help Washington
accomplish
its own goals less
expensively, more efficiently and much
more
effectively.
Nixon, an assistant deputy minister with
Canada's
Immigration Department,
does not believe the sort of changes
outlined in the
report would water down
sovereignty or lead to erasure of the
border.
"I think we can do a whole lot without
sacrificing or
challenging our identity
at all."
She pointed to a pilot project that will
allow people
crossing the Bluewater
Bridge at the Canada-U.S. border near
Sarnia, Ont., to
fill out forms at just
one stop instead of two.
"Why do we have two places to go to?" she
asked. "Why
don't we have one
pass between two countries?"
Back to the Global Menu
Back to News Archive Menu
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.