ANOTHER BILDERBERGER HEARS "CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE"
PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION?

ANOTHER BILDERBERGER HEARS "CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE"
FROM THE U.S. AND SAYS BIN LADEN
DEFINITELY DID IT.

NOW IT'S NATO'S GEORGE ROBERTSON SAYING "TRUST ME".
I DON'T THINK SO, DARLIN',
SOMEHOW, NOT EVEN TO TELL ME THE TIME.

The evidence linking Osama Bin Laden and his terrorist organisation to the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon is "clear and compelling", Nato Secretary-General Lord Robertson said today.

After the most detailed briefing yet from America on the investigation into the September 11 atrocity, he said the Alliance was now formally invoking for the first time its Treaty Article 5 which states that "an armed attack on one or more of the Allies in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all."

Nato made the unprecedented decision to invoke the Article the day after the attacks - but only on condition that was demonstrated that the assault came from another territory.

After talks at Nato headquarters in Brussels with Washington's counter-terrorism chief Frank Taylor, Lord Robertson said: "On the basis of this briefing, it has now been determined that the attack against the United States was directed from abroad and shall therefore be regarded as an action covered by Article 5".

Mr Taylor, the US State Department Coordinator for Counter-terrorism, took Lord Robertson through details of the US case linking the attacks to Bin Laden and the Al-Qaida organisation, and setting out exactly how the terrorists are being protected by the Taliban.

Mr Taylor explained the course of the inquiry so far, and what is known of Al-Qaida's involvement in previous terrorist attacks, as well as those on September 11.

Lord Roberston told reporters afterwards that the contents of the meeting were classified, but he went on: "The facts are clear and compelling. The information presented points conclusively to an Al-Qaida role in the September 11 attacks.

"We know that the individuals who carried out these attacks were part of the world-wide terrorist network of Al-Qaida, headed by Osama bin Laden and his key lieutenants and protected by the Taliban."

Lord Robertson added: "I want to reiterate that the USA can rely on the full support of its 18 Nato Allies in the campaign against terrorism."

America made no specific requests for military or intelligence support today, and the likelihood remains that there will be a limited role only for just a few of the Nato allies - possibly just Britain and France - in any US-lead operation.

The 15 EU member states have already produced a tougher-than-expected declaration agreeing that US military action against terrorists is "legitimate" and that all EU countries will all play a role if required, "each according to its means".

But it remains unclear to what extent such support, either through the EU or Nato, will be requested by Washington.









Notice: HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.


FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.