


Bosch Foresaw Globalisation
The Mail & Guardian (Johannesburg)
November 26, 1999
By John Berger
Johannesburg - In the history of painting one can sometimes find
strange prophecies: prophecies that were not intended as such by the
painter. It is almost as if the visible by itself can have its own
nightmares. For example, in Breughel's Triumph of Death, painted in
the 1560s and now in the Prado museum, there is already a terrible
prophecy of the Nazi extermination camps.
Most specific prophecies are bound to be bad, for, throughout history,
there are always new terrors. Even if some of the terrors disappear,
there are no new happinesses - happiness is always the old one. It is
the modes of struggle for this happiness that change.
Half a century before Breughel, Hieronymus Bosch painted his
Millennium Triptych. The left-hand panel shows Adam and Eve in
Paradise, the large central panel describes the Garden of Earthly
Delights, and the right-hand panel depicts hell. And this hell has
become a strange prophecy of the mental climate imposed on the
world, at the end of our century, by globalisation and the new
economic order.
Let me try to explain how. It has little to do with the symbolism
employed in the painting. Bosch's symbols probably came from the
secret, proverbial, heretical language of certain 15th-century
millennial sects, who believed that, if evil could be overcome, it was
possible to build heaven on earth. Many essays have been written
about the allegories to be found in his work. Yet if Bosch's vision of
hell is prophetic, the prophecy is not so much in the details - haunting
and grotesque as they are - as in the whole. Or, to put it another way,
in what constitutes the space of hell.
There is no horizon there. There is no continuity between actions,
there are no pauses, no paths, no pattern, no past and no future.
There is only the clamour of the disparate, fragmentary present.
Everywhere there are surprises and sensations, yet nowhere is there
any outcome. Nothing flows through: everything interrupts. There is a
kind of spatial delirium.
Compare this space to what one sees in the average publicity slot, or
in a typical CNN news bulletin, or any mass- media commentary.
There is a comparable incoherence, a comparable wilderness of
separate excitements, a similar frenzy.
Bosch's prophecy was of the world-picture that is communicated to us
today by the media under the impact of globalisation, with its
delinquent need to sell incessantly. Both are like a puzzle whose
wretched pieces do not fit together.
And this was precisely the phrase that the Zapatista leader
Subcomandante Marcos used in an open letter about the new world
order. He was writing from the Chiapas, south-east Mexico, where he
leads insurgents fighting for liberation from the Mexican state. He
sees the planet today as the battlefield of a fourth world war. (The
third was the so-called cold war.) The aim of the belligerents is the
conquest of the entire world through the market. The arsenals are
financial; there are nevertheless millions of people being maimed or
killed every moment.
The aim of those waging the war is to rule the world from new,
abstract power centres - megalopolises of the market, which will be
subject to no control except that of the logic of investment. "Thanks to
computers and the technological revolution," he writes, "the financial
markets, operating from their offices and answerable to nobody but
themselves, have been imposing their laws and world-view on the
planet as whole. Globalisation is merely the totalitarian extension of
the logic of the finance markets to all aspects of life." Meanwhile,
nine-tenths of the women and men on the planet live with the jagged
pieces which do not fit.

"What we have here is a puzzle," writes Marcos. "When we attempt to
put its pieces together in order to arrive at an understanding of
today's world, we find that a lot of the pieces are missing. Still, we can
make a start with seven of them, in the hope that this conflict will not
end with the destruction of humanity. Seven pieces to draw, colour in,
cut out and put together with others, in order to try to solve this global
puzzle." So vividly does this recall the jaggedness in Bosch's panel
that I half expect to find there these seven pieces.
The first piece Marcos names has the shape of a dollar sign and is
green. The piece consists of the new concentration of global wealth in
fewer and fewer hands and the unprecedented extension of hopeless
poverties.
The second piece is triangular and consists of a lie. The new order
claims to rationalise and modernise production and human
endeavour. In reality, it is a return to the barbarism of the beginnings
of the industrial revolution, with the important difference that the
barbarism is unchecked by any opposing ethical consideration or
principle. The new order is fanatical and totalitarian. (Within its own
system there are no appeals. Its totalitarianism does not concern
politics - which, by its reckoning, have been superseded - but global
monetary control.) Consider the children - 100-million in the world live
in the street; 200-million are engaged in the global labour force.
The third piece is round like a vicious circle. It consists of enforced
emigration. The more enterprising of those who have nothing try to
emigrate to survive. Yet the new order works night and day according
to the principle that anybody who does not produce, who does not
consume, and who has no money to put into a bank, is redundant. So
the emigrants, the landless, the homeless are treated as the waste
matter of the system: to be eliminated.
The fourth piece is rectangular like a mirror. It consists of an ongoing
exchange between the commercial banks and the world racketeers,
for crime, too, has been globalised.
The fifth piece is more or less a pentagon. It consists of physical
repression. The nation states under the new order have lost their
economic independence, their political initiative and their sovereignty
(the new rhetoric of most politicians is an attempt to disguise their
political, as distinct from civic or repressive, powerlessness). The
new task of the nation states is to manage what is allotted to them, to
protect the interests of the market's mega-enterprises and, above all,
to control and police the redundant.
The sixth piece is in the shape of a scribble and consists of
breakages. On the one hand, the new order does away with frontiers
and distances by the instantaneous telecommunication of exchanges
and deals, by obligatory free- trade zones (such as the North
American Free Trade Association) and by the imposition everywhere
of the single unquestionable law of the market; and, on the other hand,
it provokes fragmentation and the proliferation of frontiers by its
undermining of the nation state - for example, the former Soviet
Union, Yugoslavia, and so on. "A world of broken mirrors," writes
Marcos, "reflecting the useless unity of the neo- liberal puzzle."
The seventh piece of the puzzle has the shape of a pocket, and
consists of all the various pockets of resistance against the new order
that are developing across the globe. The Zapatistas in southeast
Mexico are one such pocket. Others, in different circumstances, have
not necessarily chosen armed resistance. The many pockets do not
have a common political programme as such. How could they,
existing as they do in the broken puzzle? Yet their heterogeneity may
be a promise. What they have in common is their defence of the
redundant, the next- to-be-eliminated, and their belief that the fourth
world war is a crime against humanity.
The seven pieces will never fit together to make any sense. This lack
of sense, this absurdity, is endemic to the new order. As Bosch
foresaw in his vision of hell, there is no horizon. The world is burning.
Every figure is trying to survive by concentrating on his own
immediate need and survival. Claustrophobia, at its most extreme, is
not caused by overcrowding, but by the lack of any continuity existing
between one action and the next which is close enough to be touching
it. It is this which is hell.
The culture in which we live is perhaps the most claustrophobic that
has ever existed; in the culture of globalisation, as in Bosch's hell,
there is no glimpse of an elsewhere or an otherwise. The given is a
prison. And faced with such reductionism, human intelligence is
reduced to greed.
Marcos ended his letter by saying: "It is necessary to build a new
world, a world capable of containing many worlds, capable of
containing all worlds."
What the painting by Bosch does is remind us - if prophecies can be
called reminders -that the first step towards building an alternative
world has to be a refusal of the world-picture implanted in our minds
and all the false promises used everywhere to justify and idealise the
delinquent and insatiable need to sell. Another space is vitally
necessary.
First, a horizon has to be discovered. And for this we have to refind
hope - against all the odds of what the new order pretends and
perpetrates.
Hope, however, is an act of faith and has to be sustained by other
concrete actions. For example, the action of approach, of measuring
distances and walking towards. This will lead to collaborations that
deny discontinuity. The act of resistance means not only refusing to
accept the absurdity of the world-picture offered us, but denouncing it.
And when hell is denounced from within, it ceases to be hell.
In pockets of resistance as they exist today, the other two panels of
Bosch's triptych, showing Adam and Eve and the Garden of Earthly
Delights, can be studied by torchlight in the dark.
We need them. I would like to end by quoting the Argentinian poet,
Juan Gelman:
"Death itself has come with its documentation, we're going to take up
again the struggle, again we're going to begin, again we're going to
begin all of us, against the great defeat of the world, little companeros
who never end, or who burn like fire in the memory, again and again
and again."
This is an edited version of an article which appeared in The Threat of
Globalism, a special issue of Race & Class journal, published by the
Institute of Relations
This article located at:
http://www.africanews.org/south/southafrica/stories/19991126/19991126_feat30.html
Large and hi-resolution images available:
http://www2.iinet.com/art/artists/major/b/bosch.htm
Notice: HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or may not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages are sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted article posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.