A Special Witness
Part 2
by A. True Ott

Following the disappearance of Captain Morgan, the local newspapers carried an impassioned plea for help from the community for Morgan's widow, Lucinda Morgan. A friend and similarly 'reformed' Master Mason named George Washington Harris came forward and eventually married Lucinda. Hopefully, Brother Harris was truly reformed, as he was a practicing Mason in Batavia New York and a past Worshipful Master Mason in Virginia, and he had become one of the leading elders of the Church. It is of interest to note that in 1838, at the height of Dr. Avard's institution of penal oaths, handclasps, and covenants among the Saints, that Joseph was living at the Harris home just prior to his imprisonment in Liberty Jail, where his jailers, like those of Captain Morgan, were Masons as well. It is also interesting to note that after the death of George Washington Harris at Far West, Lucinda Pendleton Morgan Harris became a plural wife of Joseph Smith. So, did he understand somewhat concerning the satanic principles of Masonry? Of course he did. The early history of the LDS Church is conclusive that he recognized that Masonry had some truth, but I submit that he felt that it had been infiltrated by Lucifer over time and because of blood oaths and covenants of secrecy had become highly polluted. Clearly, it was Joseph's intention to 'reform' Masonry that led to his death at the hands of the 'Craft', and the Church he originally organized thereafter became the only 'religion' to put Masonry into action, or in other words it became "Celestial Masonry" in worship of the Masonic God (Lucifer), just as David Whitmer warns. Clearly, the Church of Christ became hopelessly polluted with so many Masonic Brethren at the helm, especially since the death of Joseph. It should also be pointed out that upon the abduction of Captain Morgan, his manuscripts were also stolen, and a 'corrupt version' was printed to discredit all of his original printings. This is EXACTLY the same mode of operation that the Lord warned Joseph that Satan would use with the lost manuscripts to destroy the work of the Book of Mormon. (See D&C Section 10). It is also interesting to note that a biographer of Capt. Morgan wrote that Morgan was a "half-way convert of the Mormon Joe Smith - who taught Morgan the process to receive dreams and visions" just prior to his abduction and subsequent murder.

If anyone reading this in conjunction with the final testimony of David Whitmer should doubt the truth, I recommend my expose on the Temple Endowment and the testimony of one John D. Lee. However, one should also seriously consider the following interesting historical facts.

The abandonment of the 'execution of the penalties' in the LDS Endowment by 'divine revelation' in 1990 was coincidentally preceded by the abandonment of the same by British Masonry in the year 1986. Author Martin Short in his book Inside the Brotherhood states on page 43: "In April 1986, the Duke of Kent told the Grand Lodge that any future change over the penalties would be 'of our making, and not because people outside Freemasonry have suggested it'. Yet only four weeks later, when the change was accepted, the Board of General Purposes admitted the penalties had to go, partly because they gave 'ready material for attack by our enemies and detractors'. It is interesting to note, that since the penalties were omitted for the general membership, they are still very much a part of the upper degrees. Also, could this have anything to do with the omissions in the Mormon Endowment that perfectly mirrors the Masonic oaths as well? (i.e. since Mormonism is in reality Masonry, would not one change in the parent organization also be reflected eventually in the sibling?) It is also very interesting to note that one year following the British Masonry 'changes' an article appeared in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, written by David John Buerger in 1987. On page 45, Buerger acknowledged that there were "strong indications that Joseph Smith drew on the Masonic rites in shaping the temple endowment, and specifically borrowed the tokens, signs, and penalties." I must strongly disagree with Buerger here, and continue to maintain that this was largely the work of Master Mason Brigham Young, not Joseph as outlined in my expose on the Endowment. Elder Buerger went on to echo the Duke of Kent by strongly suggesting that church leaders needed to seriously consider making changes in the ceremony to counter declining rates of attendance at endowment ceremonies. He writes: "The number of operating temples has increased dramatically ------. An analysis of ordinance data, however, suggests that rates of temple work have remained relatively constant over the last fifteen years ------ Members of my own stake made 2,671 visits to the Oakland Temple in 1985, versus 3,340 visits in 1984 --- a 20 percent drop in activity. Without comparing the policies of stakes in other temple districts, it is impossible to say how characteristic my stake might be.

Who the heck is this David John Bueger, a Master Mason marching to the orders of the Masonic Pontiff the Duke of Kent and the House of Windsor? Brother Bueger felt that the Church should complete a "careful quantitative analysis by professional social scientists" to find out WHY attendance at temples had been declining - and by golly, that is just what the hierarchy did. Just a few short months after Bueger's article appeared, the Church conducted a survey of the opinions of members concerning temple work. In the instruction portion of the Survey of Adult Members in the United States and Canada, the following statement appears: "we have developed this survey to help us understand your thoughts, feelings, and experiences relating to temple and genealogy activities ------. Along with you, approximately 3,400 other members in the United States and Canada are being asked to participate in this project--------- We hope that you will feel you can be candid and open in your answers ------.. what you write will be anonymous. We will not be able to associate your name with the questionnaire you complete." This survey was to be returned by mail "by MARCH 30th," 1988.

Question #28 asked the person who had been endowed if he or she "felt spiritually uplifted" by the experience. It also probed to see if the experience was "unpleasant" or if the person was "confused" and "why". Q. 29 asks "Briefly describe how you felt after receiving your own endowment". Clearly, enough people responded negatively, for 2 years later, the EXACT SAME 'PROBLEMS' EXPOSED BY BROTHER BUEGER WERE JUST COINCIDENTALLY ELIMINATED. And we blind sheep are asked to believe this occurred by 'revelation' by a "prophet of God". No, instead let's be honest ------ Masonic Brethren take the lead - make the recommendations - members are 'polled' and voila - a 'revelation' takes place to make the Church position stronger to new members and the Satanic Rites more secure from public scrutiny. I declare this to the world. It is true. I cannot deny it. It all comes back to the truths declared by David Whitmer and the fact that the LDS Church became controlled by Luciferian worshipping Masons. Why aren't we listening?

Need more 'evidence' before you cast your 'vote'? The two highest 'authorities' in Masonry following the deaths of Adam Weishapt and Nathan Rothschild became the Italian Godfather of the Sicilian mafia, Giuseppe Mazzini, and his American counterpart, Confederate General, convicted Civil War conspirator, and founder of the Ku Klux Klan, one Albert Pike. General Pike consolidated masonic thought and doctrine in a master thesis he entitled "Morals and Dogma". A careful reading of this can lead the reader to only one conclusion if he has an honest heart, and that is that Freemasonry is a very cleverly disguised Luciferian religion - and the parallels to Mormonism are totally stunning. Pike talks about the "Light-bearer" bringing knowledge and power to the entire earth through higher education, religion, and government. Most of the book talks about these ideals, which most naïve people would accept on face value to be fine and upstanding principles. But then he hits us with the 'clincher' - when he declares just WHO the "Light-bearer" is - none other than the fallen angel known as Lucifer, the son of the morning. The son of the morning is he who brings 'first light' to the earth. He is their God, and it is He that they worship. In other private letters, Pike discusses the need for the 'Luciferian Doctrine' to eliminate the false traditions of Christianity throughout the world. In fact, no mention is made of Jesus Christ in "Morals and Dogma" except in less than flattering terms. One of the ancient names for Jehovah, or the coming Messiah is Adonay - which means the chosen, or the only begotten of God.

On page 321 of Pike's book Morals and Dogma we read the following dissertation and declaration on the nature and character of Mason's "god" - the 'light-bearer' and the fallacy of him being wrongly described by Non-Masons as the 'spirit of darkness'. Pike declares: "LUCIFER, the Light-Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! It is HE who bears the LIGHT, and with its splendors intolerably blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! For TRADITIONS are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed."

In other words, Pike is here declaring the danger of listening to personal revelations and inspirations - for in so doing we are subscribing to false traditions and demoting Lucifer from his exalted rank of Light-Bearer to the Spirit of Darkness. Oh, how subtle and skillful Lucifer is. He would make a great General Authority - but then again, he WAS. How easily he deludes good men and women into calling good evil, and evil good. How subtle he is in twisting eternal truths into falsehoods, and leading upright and moral spirits into rituals that eternally bind them to him, and away from the Savior Jesus Christ. Do you think Lucifer does not know the Savior VERY, VERY WELL?

The apostle Paul warns us about Lucifer and Satan in 2 Corinthians 11: 13-15 in much the same way David Whitmer is warning us in 1887. (Don't forget that David was called to hold the same 'office' as Paul, so it should come as no surprise!) Paul warns us that there will be FALSE APOSTLES who work in deceit by TRANSFORMING THEMSELVES into the apostles of Christ ------ "and no marvel; for SATAN HIMSELF IS TRANSFORMED INTO AN ANGEL OF LIGHT" - so why should we marvel that his ministers themselves are also transformed into supposed 'ministers of righteousness' and whose ends shall be according to their works. I submit that this transformation referred to is simply one of APPEARANCES - not REALITY! In this, the ancient Knights Templar and Masonic traditions follow closely the pattern given them by Lucifer - to COUNTERFEIT truth and the pure light of Christ. Thus, it is not surprising that Pike extols Lucifer - or Baphomet - the ancient "Goat-God" as the God of Light. Lucifer's henchman Satan is also portrayed by Pike as a simple 'misrepresentation'.

In the writings of French High Mason, A.C. Del L Rive, he records the following 'High Council Instructions' issued to him by Albert Pike on July 14, 1889, as well as to the other 23 SUPREME HIGH COUNCILS OF THE WORLD: "To you, Sovereign Grand Inspector Generals, we say this, that you may repeat it to only the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees --- that the Masonic RELIGION should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, MAINTAINED IN THE PURITY OF THE LUCIFERIAN DOCTRINE.

"Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately, Adonay is also God. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a HERESY; and the true and pure philosophic religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, the GOD OF LIGHT AND GOD OF GOOD, is struggling for humanity AGAINST ADONAY, the God of Darkness and Evil."

In this, one must never lose sight of the fact that Pike at this time occupied simultaneously the joint positions of Grand Master of the Central Directory of Washington D.C., and that of Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of Charleston and that of Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry. In other words, he was the Grand Poo-Bah of all Grand Poo-Bahs. This point also must be made. Clearly, it is the goal of the inner core of elitist Luciferians to NEVER LET THE GENERAL MEMBERSHIP OF THE RELIGION KNOW WHAT IS REALLY BEING WORSHIPPED! The rank and file Masonic membership are taught to live moral, upright, honest and chaste lives while the hierarchy practices the dark arts and the Black Mass in secrecy and obscurity - and thus they are able to deceive the people into a false sense of security and loyalty. In Mormon Masonry, the 'tie that binds' is literally the primal human emotion, LOVE of family, friends, and the 'tradition' of being 'accepted' in a social 'club' that performs numerous acts of charity - with the anchor 'truth' being the miraculous Book of Mormon. This, however, should not blind the general membership to the FACTS of our Mormon history, nor the very real POSSIBILITY that the Mormon Hierarchy is yet today participating in Lucifer's Third Degree - which involves open Tantric Sex and even human sacrifice.

Also, Pike writes in Morals and Dogma, p. 102: "---.. for Satan is NOT a black god, but instead is the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry. For the initiated, this is not a PERSON, but a FORCE, CREATED FOR GOOD, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of LIBERTY or FREE WILL. They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythological and horned form of the God PAN; thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, BROTHER of the Ancient Serpent and the Light Bearer or Phosphor of which the POETS have made the false Lucifer of the Legend."

Pike outright celebrates Satan's 'liberation' of Adam and Eve. Pike declares the "power of the Serpent" in the Garden of Eden as a pure source of 'light' and is honored by the "pure Luciferian religion" as "serpent power", the "Force", and is ultimately described as the Kundalini or "serpent force". Pike, the Sovereign Pontiff of Lucifer, declares that Satan is not the god "of the Powers of Darkness", but instead is the prime ministering FORCE of the god of Masonry's light, Lucifer. Oh, but dear reader, it gets even worse. Pike also revised the BLACK MASS in which Satan's subversion of Adam and Eve is CELEBRATED. (I ask the honest in heart Mormon to consider, are we not also 'celebrating' the fall of Eve in the endowment? Are we not asked to support Eve in her 'deception' by Lucifer when she asks LUCIFER "is there no other way", and then partakes by saying, "I will partake that MAN may be"? Are we not asked to honor Eve as making an ultimately WISE decision by obeying Lucifer and disobeying Father and Adonay to bring MAN into existence?)

Could it be even remotely possible that the REAL story of Adam and Eve is the story of the historical figure known as King Nimrod and his queen, the "Goddess Diana" - the original Whore of Babylon that fornicated with the Serpent to bring forth LUCIFER'S SEED (the Babylonians) approximately 7,000 years ago? The LDS Endowment parallels the Sumerian texts in that they both describe the Whore of Babylon as being blessed with extreme wisdom and the knowledge of esoteric 'mysteries' and 'secrets' from the Serpent after her 'fornication' with him. (Lucifer tempts Eve (Dianna) with a very desirable 'fruit' that will ultimately open up her eyes and bring her the knowledge of the Gods so that she may become one.) Could this 'fruit' be sexual intercourse with Lucifer that produced the personage of Cain - Lucifer's "only begotten son"? Where did the 'western world' even get the story of Adam and Eve in the first place? From the Jews of course - just coincidentally the SAME RACE WHO THE BOOK OF MORMON CLAIMS WERE TAKEN CAPTIVE INTO BABYLON IN 600 B.C.! Could it be possible that the history of our "first parents" are in reality the 'first parents' of the Babylonians, and is the history of Lucifer's seed? And if so, does it not follow that the Jews of 600 B.C. never really 'escaped' from Babylon, but after 3 or 4 centuries eventually BECAME Babylon by embracing their culture and traditions? Is this not the ritual that the Jewish priests were performing, causing them to be rebuked so strongly by Jesus Christ - Adonay? Is it any wonder therefore that WICCA and the Black Mass give such honor and glory to the Goddess Dianna?

In a recent book by Dr. Cathy Burns, (1994), called Hidden Secrets of the Eastern Star: The Masonic Connection, she quotes retired Commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, William Guy Carr who testifies: "While Pike was Sovereign Pontiff of Universal Freemasonry, and Head of the Illuminati during the 1870's he revised and modernized the ritual of the Black Mass celebrated to emphasise the Luciferian and Satanic victory achieved in the Garden of Eden, and over Christ to end his mission on earth. The celebrant of the Black Mass plays the part of Satan. He introduces a Virgin Priestess to the joys of sexual intercourse and makes known to her the mystery of procreation ---.. through intercourse with a goat. Lucifer is worshipped as "The giver of the True Light"; the fountain of All wisdom; and as the greatest of all Supernatural Beings. Satan is worshipped as Lucifer's Prime Minister. A Black Mass is usually followed by a Bacchanalian orgy. Those who attend are supplied with sex-stimulating drugs and beverages. They worship the body and indulge in sexual excesses, and perversions, of all kinds. Priestesses are provided for the occasion."

What are LDS 'sisters' promised to 'become' if they are ultimately 'true and faithful' to their oaths and covenants? Why, queens and PRIESTESSES of course! To who? To the "most high God". Of course, the question then becomes - WHICH GOD?

Adam Weishapt and Albert Pike both have written about the ultimate level of illumination with God (Lucifer) known as the "3rd Degree". To achieve this level, a priest or priestess MUST use perverse sexual liasons to mock the most sacred gift given by Heavenly Father to mankind - that of procreation and reproduction. Specific Luciferian rituals include perverted sexual activities to 'possess' certain psychic and/or metaphysical centers of the human body. To gain total 'illumination', initiates are encouraged to participate in what is referred to as TANTRIC SEX. There are three components of Tantric Sex - Fornication, Adultery (Polygamy), and Sodomy. Tantric Sex is designed to fill three primary areas of the human body with the spirit of a demon - specifically the mouth, vaginal or penis opening (where liquid waste leaves the body, and reproduction begins), and the anus. The spirit of the demon enters the human body upon the consummation of any three of the Tantric components.

Enter Lucifer's 'holy spirit' known as Set, or Aiwass. (The unholy Trinity equals Lucifer, Satan, and Set, or Aiwass.) Set is described as a demon 'Spirit Guide' which through perverted "sex magic" infests the occult initiate with possession by the heavenly hosts who chose to follow Lucifer. The three components of Tantric Sex, especially polygamy, is a major way in which Demonic Possession can be passed from one person to another. Thank you so much Brigham, Sydney, and Dr. Avard for exposing Joseph to the "new and everlasting covenant" of Plural Marriage!!

"Sodomy is especially "sacred" to Set because of its close association to human waste. This detestable practice serves a similar function in the anus as does the magical sex act of intercourse described above. (Adultery, Fornication, etc. --- Ott) It opens what are called the "Typhonion" tunnels, channels through which EXTREMELY POWERFUL DEMONS can travel and enter the sex partner's body. ------. The best way to open these tunnels of demonic ingress is through homosexual sex---.. (Wicca: Satan's Little White Lie, Author, William Schnoebelen, 1990, page 198)

I submit that once again, David Whitmer was testifying of truth when he warned the early Saints so strongly about the tantric sin of polygamy. Once immersed in such Satanic-inspired perversion, it is a simple step for Lucifer to inspire men to commit penal oaths involving murder and treason, by so doing, invoking therein a cadre of powerful demons - some of whom are more than capable and eager to literally turn themselves into deceptive counterfeit angels of light, while others infuse their hosts with unequivocal evil and deceptive practices. Do you feel this statement is a "little too strong"? Then ask yourself why it is, that in the true spirit of Tantric (tri-pronged) Sex, Brother Brigham taught the necessity to 'give' plural wives so that the plural wives were always in triplicate. As a 'brother' progressed in stature before God, he was 'given' additional wives, but always to a round multiple of three as soon as possible. Brigham himself, the "Ultimate High Priest" of Set, had 39 wives 'sealed' unto him. Of course, it is just a bizarre 'coincidence' that this is the ultimate Luciferian multiple of 3 - and that is 13. (3X13=39).

I have interviewed numerous individuals who fearfully tell of witnessing and/or participating in dark rituals underneath the LDS Temple in Salt Lake City. At first, I thought these individuals were psychologically imbalanced for their stories were so very bizarre that they could not have possibly been true. Imagine, the hierarchy sacrificing human infants, and even consuming human flesh during candlelit secret ceremonials? Now, however, I am more inclined to believe these individuals.

LDS President Wilford Woodruff recorded the following information given to him in a meeting with Brigham Young: "Under the pulpit in the west End [of the SLC Temple] will be a place to Offer Sacrafizes. [sp] There will be an Altar prepared for that purposes [sp] so that when any sacrifices are to be offered they should be offered there." (Wilford Woodruff's Journal: 1833-1898, December 18, 1857, vol. 5, p. 140.)

To this truth seeker, this quote is very troublesome for a couple of fairly obvious reasons. The individuals I interviewed claimed to have seen such an altar, and claimed it was underneath the west end of the temple. According to this personal journal entry, such an altar apparently existed at one time, and in all likelihood yet exists today.

But more importantly, WHY WERE SUCH 'SACRAFIZES' NEEDED IN THE FIRST PLACE, since the Book of Mormon clearly teaches that Jesus Christ fulfilled the Mosaic Law of sacrifice, and that the 'new' sacrifice required of church members is simply a personal "broken heart and a contrite spirit". Why then was a 'secret' altar "under the pulpit" needed? More important, WHAT or WHO was to be sacrificed and for what purpose? Why is this little historical truth not exposed in Mormon Sunday School discussions? Learning of such things truly is a SACRIFICE for me personally, because it truly is breaking my heart.

A COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF MOSES

In light of David Whitmer's testimony, what can we learn about the Pearl of Great Price - specifically the 'inspired' version of Moses? David makes a very strong point about the THREE SOURCES OF REVELATION, which are specifically: from the mind of MAN, from LUCIFER, or from Heavenly Father/Jesus Christ. From what 'source' did we receive the book of Moses - which is the BLUEPRINT for the LDS Endowment?? It seems there are two out of three possibilities that it did not come from Father or Christ. Let's explore what the Church itself tells us.

In the TITLE PAGE of my 1976 EDITION of the Pearl of Great Price it explains that the book is a SELECTION from the "revelations, translations, and narrations of Joseph Smith" - FIRST PROPHET, SEER, AND REVELATOR TO THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS. The next page tells us that the SELECTIONS were "First issued, as divided into chapters and verses with references BY JAMES E. TALMAGE, in 1902". I find it highly significant that this 'page' of explanation is no longer in our 'new scriptures'. WHY?

I submit to you, dear reader, that James E. Talmage was never given the calling as 'president' of the LDS Church, so under what 'authority' did he SELECT and EDIT the "revelations, translations, and narrations" of Joseph Smith? More importantly, WHAT PARTS DID HE PURPOSEFULLY LEAVE OUT? AND WHY???? Is this not akin to a modern-day 'council of Nicea'?

Let's explore what we have 'received' here. David Whitmer testifies that upon setting himself up as the "Lord's Mouthpiece" and "Prophet, Seer, and Revelator" - Joseph made his "gravest error". He 'gave up' his seerstone by which he was allowed by Father to interpret the gold plates - so by what means did he receive the 'revelation' called the Book of Moses then, if he did not have the seerstone? And again, what was the entire revelation as opposed to the edited and sanitized version given to us by Elder Talmage? Could it be even remotely possible that the Book of Moses contains elements of all three 'sources' of Revelations - i.e. a mixture of Father's truth, Lucifer's lies, and the prejudices of a Man?

In a brief 'synopsis', the Book of Moses, Chapters 1-4 gives us the story of our 'pre-existence' and the story of the creation and 'fall' of Adam and Eve - virtually identical to what is taught in the Endowment. Chapter 5, however, is where the story gets exciting. In verses 9, 10 and 11, Adam receives a TESTIMONY - not of the LDS Church, but of the REALITY of the Savior, Jesus Christ through the Holy Ghost. His soul realizes that even though he and Eve had SINNED against Father, that he would be REDEEMED because of Jesus Christ. What happened then? Adam and Eve became CONVERTED to the Savior instead of Lucifer, and in verse 12: "And Adam and Eve blessed the name of God, and they made all things known unto their sons and their daughters." But then, Satan came also among them and declared that he was also a son of God, and commanded them to "believe it not" - meaning the truth about Jesus Christ. Verse 16 tells us that Adam and Eve remained true to their conversion and witness of the Holy Ghost - after which Eve bare another son called Cain and declared: "I have gotten a man from the Lord; wherefore he may not reject his words." Eve, you have a real habit of being misled don't you? But in verses 24-25 we get the truth of the matter when the Lord gives Cain his "patriarchial blessing" if you will: "For from this time forth thou shalt be the father of his [Satan's] lies; thou shalt be called Perdition; for thou wast also before the world. And it shall be said in time to come - That these abominations were had from Cain; for he rejected the greater counsel which was had from God; and this is a cursing which I will put upon thee, except thou repent". We see that Cain did not repent, but loved Satan more than Christ and then IT HAPPENED - THE GRAND 'DEAL' AND PARTNERSHIP WAS EXECUTED!!!! "And Satan said unto Cain; Swear unto me by thy throat, and if thou tell it THOU SHALT DIE; and swear THY BRETHREN by their heads and by the Living God (in the presence of God, Angels, and these Witnesses ------ Ott) that they tell it not; for if they tell it, they shall surely die; and this that thy father MAY NOT KNOW IT; and this day I will deliver thy brother Abel into thy hands." This was the 1st part of the "contract", but as any good corporate Attorney will tell you, to be binding, there must also be 'consideration' from BOTH PARTIES. So, once Cain did his part, and swore by his throat, what was Satan's promise to him? We read: "And Satan sware unto Cain THAT HE WOULD DO ACCORDING TO HIS COMMANDS. And all these things were done IN SECRET!!" Ok, Satan became a SERVANT of CAIN just as Pontiff Pike declares the office of Satan to be in the Masonic religion!! Very interesting!! Why did they need this work to be done in SECRET? Why is the LDS Endowment 'Secret' as well? Is not the GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST TO BE DECLARED OPENLY TO EVERY MAN, WOMEN AND CHILD???? Obviously, anything 'secret' is not of Father or Christ.

GO TO:
Part 1
Part 3