Many of us who have awakened have wondered how did it get this way. How could the elitists have done this with the Constitutional Protections we have?

This study is very long, exhaustive, and takes many years to untangle all the frauds these reptilian elitists have perpetrated not only on the American people, but people around the world. I can only touch on a few in this editorial.

First, erase in your mind, the concept that the Consitution was 'for the people'!.. It was never conceived to be 'for the people' or 'by the people.' Constitutions are purely Masonic in origin. The lodges are run and ruled by 'constitutions'. In the new symbology section you will find a French constitution sent in by Bruno, which shows the Masons are in charge of creating constitutions. The same is true in American US history and its 'almost holy' document.

The US constitution was created, ILLEGALLY. The ruling document in the United States was the Articles of Confederation, which created a binding oath on all states to adhere to that document. This was evidenced in a famous law case, Texas vs. White in the 1860's. The fine patriot chaps that met and created the Constitution, were NOT elected to create a new ruling document. They had NO authority from any state or the people to do so. These fine patriots that created a new government by a constitution were rich elitists, most with ties to Masonry, Illuminati or other secret societies. There was never a consensus or a vote by the states or a vote of the people to create government anew, by the elite few. You had your first notable entrance of a government without representation... no authority to 'change' anything.

The Bill of Rights was FORCED on these elitist by the constituents in Virginia. The constitution itself was purportedly to define and confine the federal government, but it was really to FREE and UN-Restrict the government from the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, and to give the rich elitists all of the power and control. The Bill of Rights was an addendum, which defined & protected human rights. What were they being protected from, other than the constitution itself, that created a new monster!

The constitution was carefully written NOT to define and limit government and to limit human freedoms. It designed and written by and for Masonry and Elitists.

This government of few words (constitution) is limited only in how it performs and treats states and humans. It never limits this new creation in relation to NON-human entities. That was the intended purpose and goal for its creation. Moving more and more power into the hands of a selected few elitists, controlling a centralized Federal government.

Most of the ranting and raving about things being un-constitutional are simply not true. These performances of the US government are NON-constitutional and 99% relate to non-human entities which the government and elitists created themselves. Non-constitutional means the constitution is silent in regards to a particular matter.

Humans have the protected right to carry and bear arms. However, they do not have the right to carry and bear guns. Sounds absurd, but true. The BAR ASSociation, with its countless, mindless, brainwashed symbolographers, simply make new 'legal definitions' which can throw your supposed rights away, or diminish them to nothing.

These BAR ASS'rs, at the command of their rulers, then created something called corporations. A legal entity which is not covered by any constitution. All corporations are created and totally owing the government for their existence. Corpus Juris Secundum, defines ALL agents and employees of ANY corporation to be agents for the government. This was why Reagon pushed to end the Post Office and replace it with the Postal Service Corporation. The post office still exists, but is diminished, and the U.S. Postal Service Corp. exists and operates outside the constitution and is a NON-constitutional matter.

The same reason was behind the push to exterminate PRIVATE BANKING. Only three or four even exist anymore, and two of these are owned by the same people that brought an end to private banking in the United States. The rest of the banks are corporations, owing their continued existence to the Federal Government, their master. By moving business and industry out of the hands of the private individual and private owners, gave carte blanche control over those industries to the federal government. These are NON-constitutional entities --- not defined or limited by anything other than the Federal Government.

Why do you think corporations are so quick to bow down and accept any sort of rule and regulation the government issues? The government only has to revoke their charter and they LEGALLY cease to exist ....instant death. Government regulatory agencies and their countless rules and regs fall into the same category. They are non-constitutional entities, created to control the Federal siblings, the corporations.

These laws are very carefully written, and veil the truth of matters. Take the IRS code. We have heard and we all know that the IRS has no authority over any live, human, person in the US. BUT who do you work for? If you work in or for a corporation, you became an agent, and employee of the federal government. Now the judges won't tell you this when they rule against you. You can take all the frauds of the IRS and the Treasury Department before a judge, stacks of evidence in your favor, and you lose. They cannot rule on the constitutionality of a NON-constitutional relationship and if you accept any corporate benefits from employment, then you are an employee of the federal government. The IRS code is written to cover only employees of the United States ... i.e. corporations and their employees.

All states, counties, and most cities are Corporate governments. As such, they can operate outside any constitutional limitations. The US and various state constititutions are not designed to cover the acts of corporations. They make regulations and rules to control corporations and its employees.

Lincoln towards the end of his life, saw the entrapments that the elitists had led him into as he stated his fear that the power of the corporation had been entrenched.

As you enter a court to defend yourself you carry the cites and laws with your case. Where are the cites and laws you are using coming from? A law book? A book copyrighted by a corporation? You will not win most of the time trying to use the government's books and laws. How can public laws be copyrighted? The laws in the books are NOT public law...they are PRIVATE law, in that they are for the private use of corporations and corporate governements. Some are derived from public law, but inside the corporations copyrighted book, they are private law. If you use a constitutional argument --- are you inside a corporation court or a judicial court? The two cannot meet! You can be over-ruled and defeated using constitutional arguments on NON-constitutional matters in NON-constitutional courts!

By the rule of ignorance the frauds continue. Look at a deed to your property. Most likely, it says you paid ten dollars and other valuable consideration for it. You recorded this, under affidavit at the county courthouse or in county records. Did you pay ten dollars for it? That would be ten silver dollars...not Federal Reserve Notes. Why didn't it say Thirty Dollars and other valuable consideration? At ten dollars, the price you swore you paid and recorded, under penalty of perjury, denies you judicial remedy in the event of a dispute! At Twenty One dollars you were guaranteed a Judicial hearing... At Ten Dollars you are at their mercy..The BAR ASS. did it to you again! And when did it become Real Property? Why isn't it Land? Real Property is property of the Royalty. Real in the law books means Royal. Realty/Royalty. You technically are a tenant on the Royal's property, and feudally paying the rent (tax) to the master. Most of the county courthouses are designed like castles. The feudal lord over his realty.

I received most of this information from a brilliant lawyer, who hates the firm, Lawyers Inc. (BAR ASS.) and a judge that has to wear both hats.. corporate and judicial.

Think on this on your July 4th Freedom day...

The United States NEVER freed the slaves! They only changed the owners and masters. The word emmancipate, means 'in law' sold to the state, not FREED! In its hypocritical, typical, reptilian elitist mode, it has NEVER changed the wording of the constitution or amended it in any way to FREE slaves or stop counting them as 3/5ths of a person. As the United States, piously, declared all men equal, it continued to lie, steal, and cheat the first Americans, the Indians. No Indian was allowed to even vote until 1914. So much for equality. Do you feel on equal footing with the likes of George W. Bush Jr.; whose relatives were already on the receiving end 'for services rendered' from the US Government, as far back as 1868? (see the Senate Records! It doesn't even tell you what G Bush did for the government in 1868, just gave him money)