However, it must be remembered that because the intent of the site specific murder is to move vast sums of money through the death claims, the $4 million jury verdict in favor of the Havners represents a fraction of the money that the claim will carry post separation. As a result, the separation scheme must also eliminate the jury verdict.

On appeal, the focus of the separation scheme, the Texarkana appellate court ruled that Diana's attorney had "failed" to put on a scintilla of evidence of foreseeability, despite the fact that six experts testified as to the presence of foreseeability. The appellate court also deviated from the mandates of the case law by refusing to detail in its opinion the evidence presented at trial. As a result, an argument could be made that the appellate court was actively concealing and thus misrepresenting the evidence presented at trial.

If there was a failure to put on evidence of foreseeability the case law would require Diana to lose and E-Z Mart to win. This would result in a "reverse and render" judgment.

However, rendering a judgment in favor of E-Z Mart would be contrary to the money laundering scheme as a "reverse and render" judgment would shut Diana's claim down. What defendant conducts a "settlement," covert or otherwise, on a claim they have won? Yet the appellate court concluded that six experts testifying as to foreseeabiliy was no evidence of foreseeability. As such, E-Z Mart was entitled to a directed verdict in its favor as a matter of law. The appellate court's only choice was to reverse the judgment of the trial court and render for E-Z Mart.

Had E-Z Mart been a true litigant, instead of a money launderer seeking an open claim, E-Z Mart would have demanded its directed verdict. However, rendering judgment for E-Z Mart would result in an outright win for E-Z Mart, which would "close the claim" as the claim would not thereafter be susceptible to a post separation covert settlement. Once again, who "settles" a claim, even covertly, on which they have an outright win? In order to keep the claim open for a covert, post separation settlement, the appellate court did what it could not do under the law. Instead of reversing and rendering for E-Z Mart, which would have closed down the claim, the appellate court reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. E-Z Mart did not complain of what appeared to be the prospect of facing a new trial, since the true motive was to obtain an open claim.

Was the appellate court's granting a new trial good news for Diana Havner's children and bad news for E-Z Mart? No, not at all. What good is a new trial when no matter how much evidence of foreseeability is put on, the appellate court declares all such evidence to be no evidence of foreseeability? The appellate court's ruling in remanding for a new trial amounted to an impossible command that is, a new trial leading nowhere. According to the specious logic of the Texarkana appellate court, all the evidence in the world of foreseeability would add up to no evidence of foreseeability.

The Havner case went to the Texas Supreme Court, where Justice Doggett immediately caught the appellate court's improper action in remanding the case for new trial instead of rendering in favor of E-Z Mart. Justice Doggett also complained of the appellate court's action in concealing the evidence and expressly instructed the appellate court to list the evidence presented at trial.

Justice Doggett then ruled that there was evidence of foreseeability and further instructed the appellate court that its decision to remand the case for a new trial was not within the court's power under its ruling. Justice Doggett instructed the appellate court that its conduct in remanding a case that under the appellate court's ruling should have been rendered was "most disturbing."

On remand from the Texas Supreme Court, the appellate court ruled that there was insufficient evidence of foreseeability. The appellate court had to go to some length to accomplish this task; it resorted to dismissing some of the experts' testimony. The appellate court also commented on the fact that no murderer was in hand and that as a result, family members could not be excluded as potential murderers. This commentary raises questions as to why the Yogurt Shop case settled.

Amazingly, but consistent with the murder based money laundering scheme, the appellate court openly defied Justice Doggett and once again remanded the case for new trial. The appellate court was so determined to keep the site specific death claim open that it openly defied a direct order from a superior court. The end result was the creation of a death claim which arose on a site that the claim's owner was never be able to use. The claims were effectively pirated and left open for a post separation covert settlement.

The presence of the hidden motive of money laundering has proven to be overly empowering. It allows the scheme participants to subject people to site specific murder while concealing their motive. The ability to produce enormous compensation from the murder scheme has likewise proven to be irresistible. Furthermore, the system has been in place for a period of time sufficient to allow some new officials to be motivated to seek and obtain office with the intent of participating in the corruption. As a result, the courts have become remarkably "tough," even dangerous to those seeking due process for their clients. The hidden motive and the presence of so much money that needs to be laundered provides an enormous degree of de facto immunity to the scheme participants. When these schemes are conducted by judges and State Bar officials, the scheme participants come armed with state and federal salaries, immunities and the ability to sanction and incarcerate.

The end result is a top flight, highly aggressive murder-based scheme conducted at taxpayer expense by corrupt judges. The State Bar augments this impressive display of murder based money laundering power through its ability to direct a never ending array of preemptive litigation against the due process attorney. The State Bar has recently fortified its ability to conduct what amounts to state conducted terrorism against due process seeking attorneys by recently adding "mental impairment" to the grounds by which it can disbar an attorney. The mental impairment finding allows the State Bar to incarcerate the scheme resisting attorney in mental facilities for imprisonment and chemical treatment.

In both Houston and Austin, this already formidable power has been openly augmented through the use of criminal proceedings which have been directed against the due process attorney. This has occurred in my case, as I have recently been indicted, and the case of David Townsend, a Houston attorney who was imprisoned and held in leg irons and hand irons and subjected to sleep deprivation as a result of his complaints of court conducted money laundering.

In light of the Havner ruling and the dramatic liability facts (which the appellate court found noncompensable) one can plainly see how the Yogurt Shop case was not a compensable claim. No murderer is in hand. And if removing the telephone and silent alarm system and placing signs

over the windows in the E-Z Mart where Diana worked didn't amount to compensable negligence, how can it ever be said that there was liability in the Yogurt Shop case, especially since all general contractor liability contracts have specific exclusions for intentional acts such as arson or murder?

In analyzing the Yogurt Shop murders, one must further consider the demonstrated degree of corrupting power that "insider" attorneys can exercise over the Texas State Bar and the state and federal courts. These men have consistently prevented Mrs. Garcia from conducting discovery or trial and have consistently been directly involved in preemptive disbarments and arrests and directly involved in death threats and other threats, all of which were directed against me and co-counsel for Mrs. Garcia. Witnesses have likewise been subjected to death threats. After one such threat against a witness by the name of Dr. Bell, Magistrate Capelle refused Dr. Bell the right to take the witness stand in order to make a record of his testimony.

In reviewing the Havner case, we observed a great many steps that were taken to insure the security for the murderer, all of which form the element of gross premeditation. What steps were taken in the Yogurt Shop case to insure the security of the murderer? To insure that the scheme would come to fruition? Remember, if money had been laundered into the host carriers ostensibly offering coverage on the Yogurt Shop during the lag time, with the money coming on board the host carriers in anticipation of the girls' site specific death claims, then the death claims must be created. In short, the children, targeted to be murdered on the site, must in fact be murdered on the site.

Failure to murder the children on the site would imperil the entire scheme. Nor can any of the children be permitted to leave the premises and escape murder, since a shortage of death claims will result in launderer moneys staying trapped on board the host carriers. As a result, efforts must have been taken to insure that all four children remained on the targeted premises or site in order to insure that when their murderer or murderers arrived, they would all be present.

Remember, the children must be murdered on the site since it is their site specific murders which insure that the money laundering scheme comes to fruition. The death claims serve as the gang planks that permit the money temporarily placed in the host carriers' general and reserve accounts to flow unreported and tax free into the trust accounts of the participating attorneys. Once the money completes the trip (1) from the host carriers' reserve accounts, (2) through the children's site specific death claims, and ends up (3) in the trust accounts of the scheme participating attorney, that money has successfully evaded the Bank Secrecy Act and acquired full central bank access. The money, and the criminal philosophy that accompanied it, has matriculated to "full member, full power" currency.

In the Yogurt Shop case, concerns were aroused about the absence of a family member checking on four children whose murders took place after hours. How was it that no parent, no brother and no sister or loving grandparent, from any of the three families checked up on the children who were over an hour and a half late when the first fire alarms came in? How was it that the murderers were so confident that they would have the necessary time and security to conduct these murders? Why did the murderers feel so safe?

The presence of gross premeditation implies the presence of the "visible planning" designed to insure all necessary prerequisites to a successful site murder, including the presence of security for the murderers. In checking with various victims' organizations around Austin, we learned that one person had arranged for all four girls to go to a movie in the same car, a plan that assured that all four children would be grouped together on the site. No one child would leave alone or leave early. The use of a movie created a "non-reporting" destination. No one would report the children's failure to appear and the non-participating parents would be unaware of the children's absence.

But what efforts were undertaken to insure that the murderers would get into the Shop? To prevent the children from calling out? In August 1991, an unemployed male was provided with an apartment in a complex located across Shoal Creek to the rear of the Yogurt Shop. His job, according to one witness, was to go to the Shop every night after jogging and "win the girls' confidence" by speaking and flirting with them.

The man's nightly trips to the Shop also acquainted him with the nocturnal movement of people in the vicinity of the Shop, further enhancing security for the children's site specific murders. He is also believed to be the last man in the Shop on the night of the murders. Of even greater significance, the man was provided with a $40,000 "open line of credit" which, according to two witnesses, was paid to him in cash the week after the murders.

Recently, this man called a radio talk show host after a program in which his activities were discussed. He admitted that he was a frequent visitor to the shop and also admitted having the girls come to his apartment or home to water the dogs sometime prior to the murders.

Other solo legal practitioners, such as Eileen Flume and Nic Milam of San Antonio and Don Kilpatrick of Houston, have also been subjected to '"preemptive" disbarments in cases in which separation schemes were clearly conducted and defeated by the lawyer. The appearance of this pattern and the judicial and State Bar infrastructure that supports it was vivid, undeniable and deep. This broad presence of pattern suggests that attorneys associated with the conduction of murder based money laundering act as "murder brokers" and arson brokers pursuant to the site specific murders, arson and money laundering schemes.

The attorneys also act as overseers of the judicial and State Bar murder based infrastructure. Nowhere was this more clear than in Mrs. Garcia's case and in the four-dwelling arson case. In both these cases, the degree of judicial and State Bar connivance was nothing less than spectacular. (Please see internet's www.antishyster.com, newsflash, Moebius dying declaration, for an extremely detailed accounting of the court and State Bar complicity in relation to these cases.)

Who or what is the chief culprit in all of this? At present, this country is in the midst of a grand mal epidemic of money laundering, brought about by the huge bank fraud scandal and the central government's incredibly inept policy of maintaining the circulability of the old currency, currency we refer to as C-1. Because of the Bank Secrecy Act, which set in place the $10,000 reporting requirements (read trace back), an estimated $200 billion currently exists outside the central banking system, the bulk of it in storage. The recent but long anticipated change in currency has accelerated concerns about trace back and security for the currency holders. Get caught with the money and you may go to jail. Due to the change in currency, now even the maid can determine if her employer is a money hoarder. Nine months from now, that the maid will begin to wonder why she is continually being paid in old $100 bills. The simple solution? Do away with the power of the old money to circulate-- and bribe--by making the money tradable only at the central bank immediately.

How prevalent is site specific murder and money laundering through death claims? From a seven year analysis of similar incidents around the state, site based murder pursuant to reserve fraud certainly appears to be far more prevalent that one would ever imagine, with identified schemes dating back to 1985 relating to the murder of 5-year-old Andreas Hernandez. Site specific murders can and do occur in any "normal negligence zone" where people die. This includes a doctor's office, an airplane or a hospital as well as a place of work or a bar. FM Properties, an entity represented by Roy Minton of Austin, has experienced the murders of 26 of its employees in Indonesia, with all murders taking place on FM sites or being conducted in trucks or shipping containers owned by FM Properties . Even these murders can be "insured" here in Texas, allowing money to be downloaded through death claims that take place half a world away.

What should the practitioner look for? How can it be said that the injury, death or murder was a staged event, done under a cover motive or cover explanation?

The attorney has to look for the two signs of site specific murder:

The first is unusual negligence, with multiple paths that seemed designed to insure that the "injury event" which created the site specific death claim occurs. Where overt murder is involved, unusual steps will be taken to insure security for the murder and murderers.

· The second step is the presence of a separation scheme. Such schemes lack subtlety and are often conducted by racketeering judges through the issuance of intentionally reversible rulings which immediately enjoin the plaintiff from putting on their case. The schemes are blatantly visible since they separate the plaintiff from his claim at the same time the claim remains "open" to a post separation covert settlement. In severe situations where the due process seeking attorney resists or discovers the scheme, the State Bar will conduct non-stop preemptive disbarments with the intent of shaking the attorney from the pirated claim.

The practitioner is forewarned. If the first separation scheme is defeated, the money launderers become threatened, which immediately results in an upsurge of illegal activity against the attorney. This money, much of which was illegally removed from the federal reserve in the 1980's, is on the last leg of its trip home. Removal of the money from the federal reserve was just half the journey. The money is now seeking entry into the U.S. Central Banking system. Money laundering, always conducted by way of conspiracy and concealment, is well known for the wide scale corruption and violence that attends it. By all accounts, the country is in the midst of what could be called "Bank Fraud II, The War on the Central Banking System." As a result, prosecution of the Yogurt Shop case would become a national security issue; its prosecution would reveal a great deal about how reserve fraud, murder based money laundering is conducted.

It should be noted that the Havner case has made it almost impossible for a plaintiff to prevail in a lawsuit involving murder at work in situations where the plaintiff takes the case to trial. Because the motive for the murders is the creation of the "open claim", a plaintiff's "at trial" loss actually imperils the scheme by shutting down the claim. As a result, the Havner case has made it almost mandatory that there be some participation by a family member in the conduction of the site specific murder. A trip to trial may result in a complete shut down of the claim.

It was never intended that the Yogurt Shop case go to trial. My own belief is that a relative assisted in setting up the murders, likewise insuring that all plaintiffs hire a certain attorney in return for receiving funds.

One final question remains. Why did the murderers and people setting up the murders of the Yogurt Shop girls stray from the normal "no monkey business" approach and risk everything by spending so much time on the premises or site murdering these children? But for that indulgence, the children's murders would have been passed off as a "normal negligence zone" event. Instead, it was immediately apparent that the murders were not walk in, walk out murders, which in and of itself suggested an inside job. Reports are plentiful in Austin that the firemen suffered extreme trauma from what they observed. If the overt presence of "display" is in fact the case, then the co-motive of sexual sadism, being directed toward young females, is present. But for whom? A video camera? Visitors to the site?

It should also be recalled that the girls were apparently hired by the Yogurt Shop for their unusual beauty. Eliza Thomas is mentioned most frequently as a striking young lady, a 1?-year-old who was tall, strong and fast approaching womanhood. The use of the Yogurt Shop, an almost pristine ice cream store, may have served as the backdrop to an elaborate setting where young women were displayed serving ice cream as an inducement to those whose money was being solicited for the money laundering scheme. In short, the girls could have been hired to attract the money that was being laundered into the host carriers with the intent that it be murdered out through their site specific death claims.

Like it or not, we are faced with the prospect that a number of people who expected to profit from these murders by having their money laundered were able to visit the site and view the girls in the months before their murders. Of more concern is the fact that these girls may have had the opportunity and obligation to serve their future murderers. This exhibitionism is something that many of the lawyers have complained of in the way the State Bar practices its disbarment hearings, with video cameras being aggressively utilized to record all hearings.

Like it or not, we have arrived at a time where excess currency, spilled out by the central government's incompetence, has grossly empowered racketeers and other unsavory elements of our society. As a result, we exist under the thumb of people who have no desire or inclination for due process. Bribery has become so common place that) jury tampering, witness tampering, false indictments, harassing and punitive disbarments, arrest attempts based on pseudo infractions and judicial misconduct are presently far more the norm than the exception. As a result, it has become imperative that the C-1 currency's trading status be immediately restricted to the central banking system.

By implementing the Bank Secrecy Act, the central government long since acknowledged the danger the C-1 drug and bank fraud currency poses to the central banking system through its enactment of the Bank Secrecy Act and the Money Laundering Suppression Act. The central government should likewise acknowledge the danger of leaving this currency "out there" where the C-1 currency is actively funding a crisis in corruption and murder. Otherwise, this currency will continue to fund a war on the central banking system as well as a war on the society at large, resulting in a long term dominance by criminal elements unlike anything this country has ever seen. The chief problem appears to be a reluctant and dispirited central government that has persistently refused to act against the entities possessing the C-1 currency, prominently including those who actively participated in the S&L Bank Fraud. Failure to act now, before the C-1 currency manages to murder and burn its way into the central banking system, will result in the political philosophy of this money permeating its way into the central government.

(Additional discussion can be found on the internet at wwm.antishyster.com Newsflash in a soon to be placed interview entitled: "The War on the American Citizen and the Central Bank" and an article entitled "Arson and Money Laundering: The Four Dwelling Condo Fire" with the subtitle, "Are America's Black Churches Being Burned to Launder Money into the Central Banking System?")