On November 25, 1912 Marshall B. Gardner of Aurora, Kane County, Illinois, USA, submitted his
discovery application to the United States Patent Office. 18 months later, on May 12,1914, this federal
agency granted Mr. Gardner United States patent 1096102, the second most important scientific document
ever issued. Its scientific significance is exceeded only by the mechanical flight discovery of Orville and
Wilbur Wright in 1903. For reasons which even Mr. Gardner could not have fully anticipated in the early
1900s, and which are now abundantly clear, his discovery soon became the most highly classified
military secret of all time. In 1913 Gardner wrote his original book proving beyond any doubt that our
Earth is a hollow sphere. So voluminous was the evidence which he continued to amass from studies of
astronomy and Polar exploration, that he expanded his book to 450 pages in 1920.
The title is A JOURNEY TO THE EARTH'S INTERIOR or HAVE THE POLES REALLY BEEN
DISCOVERED?
Although he seems not to have been aware of it, Gardner's work had incompletely been preceded by
William Reed, whose book PHANTOM OF THE POLES was 281 pages and was published in 1906 New
York City by the Walter S. Rockey Company.
The one shortcoming with Mr. Reed's theory, otherwise
very intelligently developed, was that he had failed to finish his centrifugal force reasoning regarding
Earth's formation As a result, he was never able to logically account for the powerful source of heat and
illumination present in the Earth's Interior. Gardner, on the other hand, did account for this source.
The
difference is that whereas Reed confined his research strictly to Polar exploration, Gardner augmented
this with studies of astronomy. The majority of this article will be testimony from the real experts, the
people who were there at the huge telescopes and especially there in those vast and previously
mysterious Polar regions. But first, this is the common sense theory responsible for United States patent
1096102.
In the beginning, some 4 or 5 billion years ago, when the Earth was still an enormously expanded ball of
superhot whirling gas, it gradually began to contract as it cooled. The laws of physics require cooling
gases to condense and so the rapidly spinning sphere of tenuous gases began to concentrate as the heat
loss continued. Self-centered gravitational attraction kept reducing the diameter of the whirling ball of
cooling material...but only to a certain extent. This is the big logical distinction between the old
inadequate theory of planetary formation and Gardner's discovery. The old notion would have us believe
that the gravitational contraction continued unabated until the Earth had become molten hot under a
fierce gravitational pressure.
While such a scenario undoubtedly does routinely occur in the celestial
evolution of particularly immense bodies, as is the case with all stars, it is definetly not the final
development of typical planets.
The crucial second factor to lay stress on is centrifugal force. Remember that while gravity is attempting
to draw all of the material toward the center, there is an opposing force also at work centrifugal force.
Just as a figure skater spins much more rapidly when she brings her outstretched arms tightly in against
her body, so too did the ever contracting proto-planet begin rotating ever more rapidly as its size
decreased. Like the glued water in a bucket that refuses to spill if one swings the bucket in a fast circle,
so too was this same law of motion centrifugal force attempting to hurl all of the material outward from
the forming planet's axis of rotation. So finally, in this silent titanic struggle between two natural forces, a
balance was struck.
When the swiftly whirling sphere had drawn itself down to an approximately 8000
mile diameter, the compromise between gravitational and centrifugal force was reached. But there is
more.
There is a special characteristic of centrifugal force and we must not overlook this important trait. The
strength of 'c' force becomes greatly lessened as it approachs right angles to the direction of spin. A
simple day-to-day example of this behavior is water in a basin. If you remove the drain plug and allow
the water to start emptying from the basin, what will you eventually observe? A vortex or whirlpool, an
empty space surrounded by rapidly rotating material. Now imagine this same principal in action
concerning the contracting body which was to become our Earth. At right angles to the rotational axis, in
other words the 'poles', the c force was considerably weaker than elsewhere, especially the equator,
therefore although at the Earth's equator the c force was able to halt the material's inward progress at
about an 8000 mile diameter, it was considerably less successful in the Polar regions, there stopping the
contraction at about 1400 miles. The inevitable outcome of this natural compromise is that our planet
concluded its evolution and solidified as an 8000 mile hollow sphere with 1400 mile diameter Polar
Openings.
Now it is at this stage in the logic that Gardner advances and Reed falters. Because of his study of
astronomical records and photography as specifically relating to nebula and comets, Gardner became
aware of the whole truth. In the precise center of these translucent spheres is a proportionally small
incandescent ball. Between this luminous interior orb and the shell of the nebula is a large intervening
space; said another way, the nebula is hollow except for the bright sphere in its center. Why? Well, where
is the one other location at at which c force is quite weak, besides at the poles? The answer of course is
at the precise center of rotation, and once again the logic is so straightforward that we may readily
examine a common household example to support the arguement. What would be the result if you
sprinkled a layer of powder upon the top of a record player and then turned the record on high speed? The
powder would fly off of the record...except for a small portion at the precise center.
Based upon his studies of the planetary nebula through observatory photographs, Gardner was able to
surmise that the very thick shell of the Earth is approximately 800 miles thick, the Polar Openings 1400
miles across, and the gravitationally suspended Central Sun (the incandescent orb locked by gravity in the
exact planetary center) some 600 miles diameter. Because of the enormity and very gradual curve of the
Polar Aperture, it is impossible to visually detect it; this is the same as the fact that we do not 'see' that
the Earth itself is round. The curve is much too gradual to observe. Based on the nearly constant merger of
warm interior air with very cold exterior Polar air, the Polar Openings are almost always covered by a
thick cloud layer. This explains why when viewed from satellites the openings look just as they would if
there actually were the mythical 'polar ice caps' which government policy claims are at the Earth's
extremities. Gardner was led inexorably to his monumental science discovery by the vast quantity of
inconsistent information which he continually encountered during his years of study dealing with,
especially, high Arctic expeditions. Chief among the numerous mysteries are
1) a dramatically improving climate in the very far north,
2) the extreme peculiarity of the famous Northern Lights or Aurora Borealis, and
3) the eccentric behavior of the compass in very high latitudes.
We shall now proceed to hear from many witnesses who forfeited much comfort, convenience, and in
several cases their lives, in order that we may fully understand the true greatness of our world, a world
vastly more spectacular than officially acknowledged.
In the preface of THREE YEARS OF ARCTIC SERVICE, Lt. Adolphus Greely of the U.S. Army expresses
the amazement of his Lady Franklin Bay expedition at the strange conditions they experienced in the far
north: "Fearing exaggeration, I have occasionally modified statements and opinions entered in my original
journal, believing it better to underrate than enlarge the wonders of the Arctic regions, which have been
too often questioned." Before focusing on our own world, let us look briefly at some of our interesting
neighbors in Space. Renowned astronomer Percival Lowell comments on page 33 of MARS {out of print} "...round
what we know to be the planet's pole, appeared to be a great white cap...It proceeded slowly to dwindle
in size...As summer comes on, they dwindle gradually away, till by early autumn they present but tiny
patches a few hundred miles across ...As it melted, a dark band appeared surrounding it on all sides...it
was the darkest marking upon the disk, and was of a blue color."
The temptation to think of this blue perimeter as water must be avoided because if this were indeed
prodigous volumes of water, it would frequently be coursing through the many ancient riverbeds which
crisscross the dry Martian surface. These riverbeds are permanently dry. Instead what we are really
observing is the optical effect of vast cloud masses moving over the curving sides of the Martian polar
aperture. The exterior of Mars experiences changing seasons; the interior does not. The degree to which
atmospheric moisture and temperature vary at the pole, where the differing climates converge, will
determine the amount to which the immense blue ring will manifest itself in terrestrial telescopes. Being
unaware of the true configuration of Mars, Lowell naturally believed that this blue polar band had to be
water melted from an ice cap. In this assumption, though incorrect, he showed his wisdom. Unlike our
present government policy, he knew absolutely that the pole of Mars cannot be carbon dioxide.
Page 81: "Faraday made experiments on the relation of the congealing point of carbonic acid gas.to the
pressure...He further found that the curve for the liquifaction point lay very close to that for the congealing
point, and approached yet closer as the pressure decreased. In other words, the gas passed almost
immediatly from the gaseous to the solid state...Now the pressure is certainly very slight on the surface of
Mars...In consequence, on a rise of temperature the frozen carbonic acid gas would there pass practically
straight from the solid into the gaseous state. Now, from the existence of the surrounding polar sea, we
remark that in the substance composing the polar caps of Mars this does not occur. A considerable
portion of it is always in the transition state of a liquid. Carbonic dioxide would not thus tarry: water
would." Lowell made a particularly fascinating observation of the north polar opening when, for a short
period, a portion of the usual cloud cover parted, thereby allowing beams of light from Mars' central sun
to project beyond the orifice. "Meanwhile an interesting phenomenon occurred in the cap on June 7...as I
was watching the planet, I saw suddenly two points like stars flash out in the midst of the polar cap.
Dazzlingly bright upon the duller white background of the snow, these stars shone for a few moments and
then slowly disappeared. The seeing at the time was very good... But though no intelligence lay behind the
action of these lights, they were none the less startling for being Nature's own flash lights across one
hundred millions of miles of space. It had taken them nine minutes to make the journey;...On comparing its
position with Green's map of his observations upon the cap at Madiera in 1877, it appeared that this was
the identical position of the spot where he had seen star.points then, and where Mitchell had seen them
in 1846, ...Meanwhile the cap had been steadily decreasing in size,...On October 12, at lOh.40m.,...Mr.
Douglas measured its position and estimated its size, as was his wont every few days. He found it to be
six degrees distant from the planet's pole...On looking at the planet on October 13, at 8h.15m., to his
surprise he found the cap gone. Not a trace of it could be seen;...What had certainly been there on the 12th
was not there on the 13th. The ice-cap had disappeared."
Robert Powers remarks in MARS: OUR FUTURE ON THE RED PLANET "There seem to be vast
quantities of water in the polar caps,...Like the ice caps of Earth, they are bright white." Thomas
McDonough says in SPACE: THE NEXT 25 YEARS 'Mars also has large, bright ice caps, which can even
be seen from the Earth with a good telescope." In THE GREATEST CHALLENGE: The Incredible
Adventure and Splendid Destiny - Man in Exploring Space by Martin Caidin notes that " Both American and
Russian astronomers in recent years have observed a series of very bright flashes, lasting about five
minutes, and followed by mushroom shaped clouds." Original Moon explorer Michael Collins writes in
MISSION TO MARS "A greater mystery is what happened to all the water and ice that gouged out those
huge channels billions of years ago. Mars has a strong enough gravitational field to hold water vapor in
its atmosphere rather than allow it to escape into space...What happened to all the water that carved out
deep channels?" John Noble Wilford says in MARS BECKONS: "Mariners 6 and 7 ...The camera
photographed a hood of clouds over the south polar cap, and infrared instruments measured temperatures
there as low as 193 degrees Fahrenheit...The infrared spectrometer had appeared to detect temperatures
at the edge of the south polar ice cap that were much too high to be from frozen carbon dioxide...scientists
could see by the Soviet document that the range of possibilities for the 1994 flight was wide and
challenging. Under serious consideration were plans to place two spacecraft into orbits of Mars passing
over the poles."
On page 22 of the March-April 1992 Final Frontier are some remarks about the planet nearest to the Sun,
Mercury: "...temperatures that climb as high as 800 degrees Fahrenheit...Researchers at the California
Institute of Technology in Pasadena have identified what they believe is a water ice cap more than 180
miles in diameter on Mercury's north pole...the researchers saw a bright area at the north pole...'We were
amazed'." Marshall Gardner devotes 27 pages of his book to the study of preliminary planets, better
known as nebula. Here are a few comments. "The spectroscope supplies the answer...the spectroscope
has proven absolutely that the nebula is not made up of stars...the typical nebula has a remarkable
shell-like structure and a central star...a search made with a spectrograph and the Lick 36 inch telescope
for rotation effects...Definite evidence of rotation was found..."
On page 63, in reference to comets as being planets in the process of destruction, Gardner writes "Hecter
MacPherson tells us in his book, THE ROMANCE OF MODERN ASTRONOMY that the great comet of
1811, with a tail stretching for a hundred million miles behind and fifteen million miles in breadth, had a
nucleus that according to measurements by Herschell was only 428 miles in diameter. The comet of
Donati, detected from a Florence observatory in 1858, had a nucleus which 'shone with a brilliance equal
to that of the Polar Star' and which was 630 miles in diameter...'even in the short period of man's life comets have been seen to
break up and disappear'."
Included in his many observations concerning Mars, Gardner points out that
besides the numerous reports of the Martian pole being very bright and making rapid size changes, "...the
light from the polar region of Mars is a direct illuminant from within the planet, because that light, seen at
night, is yellow. Any other sort of light, a reflection from a snowy surface, for instance, or a reflection
from sand or mountain surfaces, would be white."
On page 80, Gardner displays eight excellent photographs of Mars recorded at the Yerkes observatory
and which show the "...so-called snow-cap, projected beyond the planet's surface, which precludes all
possibility of its being snow or ice." In writing of the English astronomer J. Norman Lockyer's report to
the Royal Astronomical Society of England: "'The snow-zone was at times so bright that, like the crescent
of the young moon, it appeared to project beyond the planet's limb. This effect of irradiation was
frequently visible; on one occasion the snow-spot was observed to shine like a nebulous star when the
planet itself was obscured by clouds...'.that luminosity is precisely what our own aurora borealis would
look like if our planet was viewed from a great distance. And the light is the same in both cases." As lame
as the official government position is in postulating ice, snow, or frozen carbon dioxide as composing the
Martian poles, imagine their predicament in the case of Venus. By their own admission, the temperature
on Venus is well in excess of 800 degrees Fahrenheit...quite a place to put an ice cap! Whether by choice
or by chance, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
released a few remarkable radar-generated photographs of Venus in early 1989. One of these close up
images, in which the cloud-piercing radar reveals with excellent clarity the north polar opening, boldly
graced the cover of the April 1989 issue of Discover. Now back to Earth.
Certainly one of the three greatest pioneers of Polar exploration was Dr. Fridtjof Nansen, the acclaimed
Norwegian scientist and Arctic voyager. Perhaps the most interesting expedition ever conducted in the
Arctic area is chronicled in Nansen's 679 page two volume work whose complete title is: FARTHEST
NORTH: 'Being the Record of a Voyage of Exploration - the Ship "Fram" 1893-96 and of a Fifteen
Months Sleigh-Journey by Dr. Nansen and Lieut. Johansen'. On page 120, when the 13 man crew had
already reached almost 77*N. latitude, Nansen observes "It was a strange feeling to be sailing away north
in the dark night to unknown lands, over an open, rolling sea, where no ship, no boat had been before. We
might have been hundreds of miles away in more southerly waters, the air was so mild for September in
this latitude...We see 'nothing but clean water', as Henriksen answered from the crow 's nest when I called
up to him...'They little think at home in Norway just now that we are sailing straight for the Pole in clear
water'...I have almost to ask myself if this is not a dream. One must have gone against the stream to know
what it means to go with the stream."
Another of the major contributors to Arctic knowledge was U.S. Army Lieutenant (later General)
Adolphus Greely. Like other Arctic voyages, the Lady Franklin Bay expedition encountered the truly
bitter cold conditions in the lower portion of the Arctic region, but less harsh climate as they neared 80*
latitude and especially mild weather beyond the 80th parallel. On page 369, when their party had attained
the 81st latitude while map- making for the Army on Ellesmere Island, Greely comments "At that time a
high warm wind was blowing from the interior, and the temperature was considerably above 40*(5*C.)."
His use of the word 'interior' was more profoundly accurate than he realized. An example of how
dramatically the warm winds from the Interior affect the far north exterior is demonstrated in this passage
from page 192, when the winds had for a long while been from the south: "At 10 P.M., February 16th, the
mercurial thermometers thawed out, after having been frozen continuously for sixteen days and five hours.
This is the longest time on record during which mercury has remained frozen." Dr. I.I. Hayes, with the
schooner United States, wrote of his far north voyage in THE OPEN POLAR SEA. They were utterly
bewildered by the inexplicable increase in temperature whenever the high Arctic wind sustained from the
north. While stalled by a strong persistent wind out of the north for much of the first two weeks of
November, Hayes noted that after the great initial masses of ice had been driven past them, there were
none more to replace them. He adds, "November 13: Worse and worse. The temperature has risen again,
and the roof over the upper deck gives US once more a worse than tropic shower...November 14: The
wind has been blowing for nearly twenty four hours from the northeast, and yet the temperature holds on
as before...I have done with speculation. A warm wind from the 'mer de glace'...makes mischief with my
theories, as facts have heretofore done with the theories of wiser men."
Ships' surgeon for the 'Advance'
and 'Rescue':
Dr. Elisha Kent Kane recorded his extensive Arctic experience in ARCTIC EXPLORATIONS IN
SEARCH OF SIR JOHN FRANKLIN, experiences which culminated near the 82nd parallel. The
expedition progressed as far north as was practical in their ships and then when the amount of ice
rendered additional progress impossible or at least unsafe, they continued their poleward journey on foot
with sledges. But as with other Arctic explorers before and since, they were amazed to eventually find
further advancement thwarted by the gradual encroachment of an open polar sea. He writes ''It is
impossible in reviewing the facts which connect themselves with this discovery, the melted snow upon
the rocks, the crowds of marine birds, the limited but still advancing vegetable life, the rise of the
thermometer in the water, not to be struck by their bearing on the question of a milder climate near the
pole. To refer them all to the modification of temperature induced by the proximity of open water is only
to change the form of the question; for it leaves the inquiry unsatisfied. What is the cause of the open
water?" About 130 years later we have these remarks from Russian explorer Vladimir Snegirev in his
1985 ON SKIES TO THE NORTH POLE: "On May 9 they crossed the 86th parallel...It was a strange
thing indeed: you might have thought that as they approached the Pole the ice would become thicker,
stronger, more solid, but in reality it was just the other way around. The closer they came to their goal, the
more often they encountered open water..."
{continued below}



All Content © HiddenMysteries - TGS (1998-2005)
HiddenMysteries.com Internet Store ~ HiddenMysteries Information Central
Texas National Press ~ TGS Publishers Dealers Site
All Rights Reserved
Please send bug reports to the Information .